Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This TMCC control of DZ 1000's is done with an SC-2 controller.   There are two sets of DZ 1002 push buttons per switch and the SC-2 controller. SC-2 controller will accommodate (6) switches.   Fort Pitt Highrailer  "Y" module.

 

Click on the triangle. All switching is done with a Cab 1 and Command Base via the SC-2 controller.  Most switches in the video are paired cross-overs.

Last edited by Mike CT

I also use DZ2500s with a command bus wire to fire switch motors with my CAB2.  I know that the first generation of DZ switch motors could not be directly controlled by the Legacy base.  

 

I do not have any experience with TMCC/CAB1.  I do have an a couple SC-2 that I am not using.  Email me if you need them..... time4trains@live.com  But if you are using Legacy an DZ2500s you don't need the SC-2. 

 

good luck!

Our club/museum tried it on a very large layout. It was a disaster. I wasn't directly involved, but the guys who took care of it were constantly replacing switch machines and diagnosing malfunctions. We tore out the TMCC hookup and now they are controlled only from the panel. This was on a big layout; on a smaller layout with less real estate and fewer switches it might work better. 

On a former layout I controlled  the DC Tortoise Motors, with Cab 1 through ASCs and diodes to rectify VAC. First 7 modules on the left[photo 1] controlled 32 turnout motors.

 

I found it unwieldy and distracting punching buttons on Cab 1. So, after dismantlement of the big layout and I built my small 9x16 attic round-the-wall operation I went with direct Toggle switch operation of the 17 Ross and Curtis turnouts operated by Tortoise and powered by a 12VDC wall wart.

 

Placing the Toggles appropriately in relation to track schematic on a simple homemade panel[photo 2], the "lean" of the Toggle handle toward either the "out" or "through" position on the schematic provides an immediate indication of the switch position...to a siding[out] or the mainline [through].

 

I don't need indicator LEDs for determining position of remotely located turnouts or have to watch the Switchstand Lights that I can see from my Senior Citizen perch.  

 

Crude but simple for old folks with comparatively small run and display layouts.

100_1090-003

 

IMG_1782

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 100_1090-003
  • IMG_1782
Last edited by Dewey Trogdon
Originally Posted by superwarp1:

DZ-2500 switch machines throughout my layout, connected to a data driver to the command base, each switch has it's on address number.

lets see if i can ask this question

i have three switches in "WYE" configuration  and i have a command that goes one way and then another command that reversed the "WYE" in one movement

 

also have the big cross over (man what a $$ HIT) can i program that it goes from mainline to secondary line and control with two commands or three??

Originally Posted by pelago:
Originally Posted by superwarp1:

DZ-2500 switch machines throughout my layout, connected to a data driver to the command base, each switch has it's on address number.

lets see if i can ask this question

i have three switches in "WYE" configuration  and i have a command that goes one way and then another command that reversed the "WYE" in one movement

 

also have the big cross over (man what a $$ HIT) can i program that it goes from mainline to secondary line and control with two commands or three??

Yes.

On the cross over, have the two facing each other assigned the same number. Say turnouts numbers 7 face each other diagonally left to right from outer track to inner track and the other two, turnouts 8, face each other from inner track to outer track diagonally.

Could be a route throwing switch motors in sequence on the 3 way. Have done it for the ladder type or a big y reversing section off of a main line. Then a third route sets the two on the mainline straight.

I have controlled 32 Ross switches (28 individually and 2 paired) using TMCC/CAB 1, Powermaster for eighteen years. Switches are powered by NJI motors and controlled by IC Control #ASC 3000, now Lionel ASC 6-14182.  They work beautifully. I am able to set up routes, as well as operate them in a non-de-railing mode, by removing the spring on the bottom of the switch.  For backup, in the event of motor failure, the switches also are wired to a control panel/pushbutton which I rarely use. Switch motors are mounted beneath the layout on RIX hangers. The motors are no longer made. The NJI motors were used, because at the time, Lionel SC 1s could not handle the amperage for the motors.  Shortly after I built the layout, the SC 2s came out.  They will do the job. My track is Gargraves.  I have had three motors go "belly up" since installed.  Fortunately, I have a few extra motors.  A major reason I have held back on moving to Legacy is because I have been unable to get a definitive answer as to whether my switches will operate as effectively with the Legacy Base/CAB 2, as they do now.  I do think they may work with the Legacy L/Cab 1L/Powermaster L arrangement, but I am not convinced the gains made by such a move warrant the expenditure needed.     

Yes - have used the IC Controls ASC 3000 with Ross switches flawlessly for years.  That double cross over of yours should have a Z stuff relay hooked up to it if you want slow speed operation through the switch.  Mine came  with one.  They can be a pain because you can't set this up for non derailing and if you run through the switch turned the wrong way - puff - there goes the relay.  I won't use this switch on a mainline again.   I would use two single crossovers.  But, you may not get that far, and in the end, may not want to.

am somewhat confused, am old fashioned i like to hold stuff in my hands before spending $$  in my other pursuits (shooting, ham radio) i can do that much easier than this hobby

 

is it possible for someone to do a block diagram for Ross using

DZ2500

DZ 1008

6 switches associated with

Ross double crossover

 

controlled by??

SC2 controller or dz2001A data wire driver (wouldn't having both create some redundancy?)

again here is my modest layout and all the switches are there even though there are not many having to push all the buttons might created disaster

 

 

 

Last edited by pelago
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Northern:

Might get a little expensive but a DZ1000 can be made TMCC controllable by adding a DZ2000. It connects right to the wires of the turnout machine, is programmable from #1 to #99. No "home run" wiring needed back to the SC's, TIU's or control panels. I have a number of them on my layout.

but

 

The DZ-2000 receives a TMCC signal on a data wire generated by our DZ-2001 Data Wire Driver and is especially designed to operate our DZ-1000 Switch Machine. It will operate most other switch machines and traditional accessories. It can easily be set for any SWITCH or ACCESSORY address.

 

need the dz2001A also

Not sure if people are still struggling with this but I have a layout completely made of DZ-2500 switches (18 switch machines total) and a DZ-2001D data wire driver.  Make special note of the "D" version of the data wire driver as the earlier versions are not as dependable.

Also, you need to ensure that ALL your switch machines are at the current update.  To check:

a)  gold disk on the bottom of the switch machine; silver is the older style.

AND

b) a red check mark on the gold disk indicating that the latest firmware has been loaded.

Make note that you DO NOT want to power the switches and data wire with a ZW-L transformer.  For some reason, the electronics in this beast have an odd signal the the DZ machines don't play with.  I do use the ZW-L to power all my trains, just not the switch machines and data wire driver.  I use an old ZW for the and it works fine.  I am told that a Lionel CW-80 transformer also produces a good signal for the switch machines and data wire driver.

With regarding to the double crossover, I make all 4 switch machines the SAME ID as it keeps down on the amount of "commanding" you have to do to get it to throw straight OR out.  You're not going to do both with a double crossover at the same time.

I have this all under LCS and commanding it via the LCS app.  Unfortunately, Lionel does not yet have an STM2 that works with DZ-2500s yet but I know they are working on it.

pelago posted:
Originally Posted by Lima:

Which switch machines, DZ 1000 or DZ 2500? Makes a big difference.

have both 6 on single switches and then the crossover that gave me four individual switches if i wanted to do it that way

Pelago,

Not sure I understand what you mean by both.   Do you have some switches with the DZ-1000 switch machine with the two-button controller as well some switches with the DZ-2500 switch machine with the single button controller?  For easier control wiring, you should have all switches with the DZ-1000 or all switches with the DZ-2500.  What do you have?

Please refer to my comments above in Jan. 2015. The layout is still essentially the same and the switches still operate flawlessly, as described, but with one difference: all now is Legacy controlled.  I purchased a complete Legacy package (CAB 2 and Base) and a Powermaster Bridge, no longer made, but they are still in some shops.  My five 1st Generation Powermasters are still in place and I control my 32 switches, as described earlier.  By using the "Bridge", I saved a ton of money and all works well with my CAB 2 and Cab 1L.  Having to remember the turnout numbers is good mental exercise for an old guy.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×