Skip to main content

silverreefer

 

Would someone enlighten me about these reefers?  I'm interested in timeline, accuracy, and usage.  Sometimes Lionel does very well and sometimes not.  Thanks to anyone that can help me out.

 

What is the chance that something like this would be seen on a Santa Fe train?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • silverreefer
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Lionel reefer models a PFE R40-23 which  has a different style dreadnaught end than either of the two experimental PFE R40-14 aluminum superstructure reefers.  The AtlasO body is incorrect for either of the two PFE R40-14 aluminum superstructure reefers as it utilizes the Intermountain R40-10 tooling.  The visible differences are the R40-14 reefers featured rounded corner posts and low profile hatch covers, while the R40-10 has square hatch covers and corner posts.  Athearn made a very credible kit model of the aluminum PFE reefer 45698.  I also like the aluminum look  on the Athearn model as the body parts are of aluminum.   

 

PFE modified 50 R40-10 reefers for express service, painting them Pullman green.  I believe both AtlasO and Intermountain offered R40-10's painted

for express service.

 

Ed Rappe

Last edited by Keystoned Ed

What did you expect?

 

Considering that Lionel had done a single reefer offering and also a set of 3 (a total of 4), I though that perhaps PFE had painted a number of silver reefers for a certain purpose, a train handling certain goods, or that was run on a "fast" schedule, etc.  Of course, I was only guessing.

 

I didn't expect that there was only two somewhat experimental aluminum cars.

Keystoned Ed, you seam to know your PFE cars, so what is your opinion on the MTH 20-94088 reefer?

 

Also, it is my understanding that reefers where painted silver to try and reflect heat back away from the car. I know the DRG "cookie boxcars" where done this way, it is possible that after reviewing the results it was determined that it was not worth repainting the entire fleet, I am only theorizing of course. I have the big PFE book, but unfortunately it is in storage right now.

I'm not familiar with the MTH reefer and so I can't comment on how it compares with its prototype.  Does anyone know what PFE class the MTH car is lettered for?  The two PFE aluminum body reefers had clear lacquer topcoat over unpainted aluminum.  The cars weighed 10,000 lbs less than their steel counterparts - but cost more to build.  The PFE book states that the experimental cars (one each  of materials furnished by Alcoa and Reynolds) were in part subsidized by discounting the cost of the aluminum.  Perhaps the line haul savings due to reduced weight didn't offset the higher construction cost or more would have been built.

 

With the exception of the two aluminum cars, PFE reefers featured red roofs up until a  change was made in 1962, when aluminum paint was specified. 

 

I don't claim to be an expert on PFE, but the PFE book by Thompson, Church, and Jones has a wealth of information in it that is very handy for modelers and manufacturers.

 

Ed Rappe

 

 

Finally got time to get "Pacific Fruit Express" book out of the upstairs library.

 

" In September, 1946, PFE finished construction at Los Angeles of an experimental car which had an all-aluminum super-structure, made from material furnished by Reynolds Aluminum. Even the running board, floor rack slats, hatch covers, brake wheel and most of the ice tanks were aluminum. The under frame, however was steel, except for aluminum side and end sills; safety appliances were also steel, as aluminum was not permuted for those parts."

 

"The car, numbered 45698, had been one of the 1000 R-40-14 cars built in 1941, and officially was 'rebuilt'."

 

"The finish was clear lacquer over bare metal. In October, 1947, PFE completed a second, virtually identical aluminum car, this time constructed of Alcoa's metal, and numbered 44739. As with the #45698, the number of a dismantled car was used."

 

"There were a few problems in service with galvanic corrosion wherever steel and aluminum parts were in close proximity, particularly in car #45698. Performance of "44739 was considered better, evidently due to better separation of aluminum and steel."

 

"Both cars lasted over 15 years in service. The 45698 was destroyed in a wreck on the Burlington at Stratton, Nebraska in May 1962, while #44739 was scrapped in 1966. Scrapping of the steel R-40-14's had begun by that time. Thus, as with other aluminum experimental cars, service durability was not one of the problems."

 

"These two aluminum reefers remained in their natural aluminum color all their lives."

 

Also, for what it's worth, many years ago Intermountain made a special exclusive run of both road numbers of the "aluminum" reefers for Des Plaines Hobby Shop.

 

Hope this helps. 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×