Skip to main content

Edit 5:04 EST 11/21/12  This locmotive died after about 20-25 minutes run time total.  I post some info about that at the end. 

-----------------------

I bought the MTH 999.  It is a nice little loco.  It takes a long time to decide it is going to have to run in conventional but after that we got along great.  Smooth runner, runs at a pretty slow speed in conventional (despite the "land speed record" 84" drivers and pulls six cars -- all I tested today, nicely.  Nice lights, very good sound.  This PS3 loco does have sound obviously better than my PS2 locos (another PS3 loco recently acquired left me undecided) - sound nearly as good as the best Vision or Legacy locos, and with such a small tender, too!.  Weird whistle.   Detail is good, paint quality good, etc.  No too much detail, but then I don't think there were too many details to model.

 

Altogether, I rate it as equivalent in conventional running capability with and much like the WBB Baldwin ten-wheeler (a bit smaller though) in "feel" and stature on the track, but with slightly better quality of detail AND very good sound.  I like really the sound- very rich chuffs.  Definately worth the $500 I paid.  

 

Remember this is a scale loco.  Here are pictures of it with the scale Lincoln funeral train loco and an old and very tired General.

999

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 999
Last edited by Lee Willis
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hello Lee Willis..........

 

I would guess its the 86" driver model.    I like those painted spokes drivers and wheel sets as that make the model really stand out.   Perhaps you can set the scale "999"  4-4-0 besides your scale S.F.#2900 class 4-8-4 and take photos of it and post it here to see how really big the S.F.#2900 is for fun ?

 

the woman who loves the S.F.#5021 

Tiffany

Originally Posted by mountain482:

Lee,

 

What you have is the 70" driver version as seen here: http://www.mthtrains.com/content/20-3386-1 

 

The 86" driver version looks like this: http://www.mthtrains.com/content/20-3385-1

If so I am very pleased - I searched high and low for the smaller driver version -- I wanted a model of 999 as converted back to the more workaday design after its supposed 102 (maybe) and 112 (no way) mph top speed run, but the loco I ordered was listed as having the big drivers.  The mistake worked out well.   This is a nice loco.  With bigger wheels (as pictured on the site I bought it from) it looked bizarre.  This looks nice and runs slow - I imagine the motor gear is the same regardless of driver size, which means with the bigger wheels it would run about 20% faster - so I am very pleased to have this version.

 

Tiffany - Frankly I don't like the paint, particularly the painted spokes and the script name on the tender.  I'm not sure the real loco had shiny lacquered brass piping either (but I will do some research).  Now, I realize that all makes it look pretty, but I want a more realistic look and will probably repaint it (or neolube) for an industrial look with a trace of weathering, etc.  

 

Sorry . . . 

Last edited by Lee Willis
Originally Posted by Tiffany:

Hello Lee Willis..........

 

post it here to see how really big the S.F.#2900 is for fun ?

 

the woman who loves the S.F.#5021 

Tiffany

Tiffany, here it is next to Northern 3759 - not quite as big, but close, (my 2926 - an early PS1 model that misbehaves frequently - is on a very high shelf, while 3759 was right there).  

2760 locos later . . .

 

BTW everyone, I have a new video camera and took a nice movie of 999 but it's recorded in some format that made even a short film over the 100 Mb limit.  I will try to edit or take a shorter one today after work.  999 is an incredibly smooth slow runner with good smoke and nice sound.  It will run noticeably slower in conventional, than most of my Legacy locos.  It's just stubborn to engage into conventional when I first fire it up each time, that (and the paint) is the only downside - sometimes it fires up and runs in conventional but won't turn on its sound.  I have to shut down and wait about half a minute and then try again.  

 

The paint is bizarre (prototype or not - I don't know - I dislike it) the roof of the cab is the flat-est flat black I have ever seen - like a blackboard -  but the boiler and cab sides are satin with just about a semi-gloss sheen to them.  The painted spokes look good in the photos, but the thing about painted spokes is that the paint has to be perfectly aligned (as on the painted spokes on the Legacy blue Comet) - if it is not right down the center of each spoke, but even a tiny bit off, it looks strange (at least to me).  I will definitely repaint this puppy eventually.  I had expected it to be mostly a shelf queen I bought to display along with the LFT loco and one of my Baldwin ten -wheelers to show the early (1860 to 1900) evolution of steam, but this puppy is such a good runner with good sound . . . I

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2760 locos later . . .

Nice engine Lee. Good luck with it. 

 

 

 

but I want a more realistic look and will probably repaint it (or neolube) for an industrial look with a trace of weathering, etc. 

 

Sorry. . .

No please don't do it! It was a passenger engine. Keep her clean!

 

 

Seriously, do whatever makes you happy. I'm just kidding.

Lee, you got short changed. Send it back.

 

The NYC did have engines in this same class with shorter drivers, but the MTH model doesn't capture the look very well at all. You should send it back and get the model of 999 the way she was MEANT to look--with 86" high-heeled slippers and a Russia Iron paint job--the pinnacle of steam locomotive technology in 1893--the true "golden era" or railroading.

 

The black thing you have there is but a shadow of the real thing.

I also prefer the blue version with the larger wheels but to each his own. It's a personal opinion. I didn't think I would like the blueish gray engine with the large wheels but it really grew on me. It is the only steam engine I have that isn't black.

 

And not that I am trying to be nit picky or anything like that but shouldn't the above picture say "Luke, I am your father"?

Originally Posted by smd4:

Lee, you got short changed. Send it back.

 

The NYC did have engines in this same class with shorter drivers, but the MTH model doesn't capture the look very well at all. You should send it back and get the model of 999 the way she was MEANT to look--with 86" high-heeled slippers and a Russia Iron paint job--the pinnacle of steam locomotive technology in 1893--the true "golden era" or railroading.

 

The black thing you have there is but a shadow of the real thing.


Thank you, but no, I'll keep it.  I really like it, and while it drives my wife crazy - I never return things I've bought.

 

As to the drivers, I thought I was buying the 86" inch driver version (the website listing representing it has having them) but actually wanted the version with the smaller drivers (I could not find one at a good price) - I don't really want loco 999 as much as a workaday, late 19th century 4-4-0 locomotive. 

I am going to repaint this as a workaday black locomotive, but . . . I am intrigued by the Russian Iron paint concept.  I'm thinking - if I neolubed the entire thing, would i get a patina close to the look of Russian iron? or something close?  Going to try on an old locomotive shell I have later this afternoon.  Otherwise, its flat black for this puppy and a new number and roadname (Union Pacific).

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×