I have long noticed that incandescent lamps dimmed by (presumably) simple dimmer circuits will show a shorter life than expected. Not only that quite often in a pair of bulbs one bulb will burn out rather quickly. I have noted this with a pair used outside the front door. I have generally used 25 watt bulbs in these in recent years, and just this month I found the instructions for their timer. (Yes, I know a timer is not a dimmer, but it is a sharkwave circuit closer.) Use minimum of 40-watt bulbs, per these instructions, for this instance. What do I make of this? These are standard base 120-v bulbs.
I have a lighted overhead fan, radio remote operated; that is, it too has electronic switches. Same problem with bulbs, noticeably short life of one bulb, although I haven't noticed it yet and it may be a couple of months already. Possibly max wattage bulbs were used this time.
At the front door, the farther bulb on the circuit generally burns out early, IIRC. It's obviously about ten feet further on. As the current pulse runs down the wire, it will be reflected from the far end of the line. This will double the cycle starting voltage at this bulb. Remember that the sharkfin wave does not start at zero current and voltage, because solid state 5-volt devices do not begin to switch until the enabling voltage is somewhat over 4 volts. Then how many volts to drive the power supply to a reliable 5-volts, or is that an issue on original turn-on only?
At any rate, the problem has to be that the in-rush current 120 times per second is exceeding what is expected, and I would suggest an internet search with this as a premise. -- Frank