Skip to main content

Would it be practical to power a typical steam locomotive with an external boiler?

Let's say for the sake of argument that a small excursion railroad has a locomotive with a boiler that needs extensive work. It would take years for the work to get done, IF funds were available.

Seems to me that a company could hide a modern generic industrial boiler in a period-correct replica freight car, and lease out these "steam cars" to railroads as an alternative to expensive boiler work. When the boiler is due for inspection/replacement, the lease company swaps out cars and the railroad continues to operate. All the railroad would have to worry about is maintaining the running gear.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I.K. Brunel, engineer of the Great Western Railway in England, drew up general mechanical specifications for his original group of broad-gauge locomotives (7'-1/4" gauge) and received an assortment of engines of different designs that met the basic specifications, from five different English builders (ca. 1837). One builder's solution (Hawthorn, using a patent held by T.E. Harrison) was to put the boiler and the engine (and tender) on completely separate carriages, with flexible ball-and-socket steam connections between engine and boiler. Several problems made this design unsuccessful, including leaks in the flexible couplings and lack of weight on the driving wheels. In theory, however, a broken engine carriage could be swapped out, as could a damaged boiler. One of the two engines of this separated design, "Hurricane," had driving wheels 10 feet in diameter; the other used 6-foot drivers with step-up gearing to reduce piston speed. Brunel wished to reduce piston speeds as much as possible because of his concern with adequate lubrication and wear (no petroleum lubricants at the time).

 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×