Skip to main content

Question for the 1:1 experts, at any time would it have been appropriate that freight cars be pulled along with passenger cars?  I'm thinking not as far as hoppers etc..are concerned, but I wasn't sure about box cars.  Just curious, I've done some digging around and can't come up with any pictures that would show a consist like this.  If this is indeed a true statement, where would the expected placement of the pass. cars be?  Before or after the freight?  Thanks!

 

Joe

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mixed trains, freight and passenger, were once quite common on branch lines throughout the country. I've even seen photos of a Union Pacific mixed train pulled by E units! A book, probably now out of print, called "Mixed Train Daily" used to be a good resource. I've seen the passenger cars at the front, behind the locomotive,  or at the rear of the freight.

I've also seen passenger trains that had freight-type box cars among the head end cars. I think one of the Lionel Jersey Central Box Cars is even lettered "for passenger train service."

The Georgia Railroad used to operate a mixed train between Augusta and Atlanta, one of the last operated, I believe. I think I have a photo of it that I took back in the 1970's. I will will look for it and post if I can find it. I remember the passenger coach was stainless steel/streamlined.

 

Bottom line: I think you can order the cars in any way you prefer, or they run the best, and there will be a prototype for it somewhere.

 

 

As mentioned above, they definitely rolled into the diesel era.  The Bloomfield L&N branch from Shelbyville to Bloomfield, Kentucky ran through my great aunt's farm,

and is pictured with what I think is a Baldwin diesel road switcher.  It was made up

of freight cars with a Jim Crow (baggage compartment in the middle separating

two passenger compartments) combine on the end.  My mother rode that train to

visit her aunt during the steam era.

Often, if a passenger car was used on a mixed train (instead of putting passengers in the caboose), it differed from other passenger equipment in not having steam heat.  Or, the passenger cars were behind the engine and were steam heated, while the freight was on the rear.  

 

Express boxcars were common on secondary trains and mail trains, but these differed from common boxcars in having through steam lines so that cars behind them could use steam heat.  They also had the ability to have their air brakes set for graduated release so that the engineer could reduce braking effort in increments when stopping (unlike freight car brakes which release entirely when released.  And, finally, many also had brackets for hanging marker lamps on the rear -- a standard feature of all pre-Amtrak passenger cars.

The Strasburg Railroad, famous for its passenger trains, also does a hefy freight business. This year saw a primarily steam operated freight business and the railroad, like they once offered years ago, once again offered people to ride in the caboose for a fee. This is REAL REVENUE freight. Not a photo charter. Riding their mixed freight has become so popular that it is not uncommon to see a coach or two, in addition to the caboose, on the train. Don't be surprised to see a doubleheader as well to move freight, sometimes steam/steam and steam/diesel doubleheaders.

 

http://www.strasburgrailroad.com/mixed-train.php

 

See below for some videos from Youtube: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8RbUecQjzw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQM4BVd0W1M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7BmVqkwr9Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7BmVqkwr9Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXiEGxf_BRs

Another variation are express or milk cars tagged at the end of a passenger consist as I saw this nearly daily on the Soo Line "Laker"..anywhere from four to six express cars on the end outfitted with passenger trucks, bringing up the markers..The Rock Island passenger runs had piggyback cars on some runs.. ( I cannot recall which ones) Also on some short lines, or branch lines, even a doodlebug ( as JayJay mentioned ) would pull freights. On interurbans especially built freight trailers would be tagged at the end of passenger runs on a regular basis. I add similar milk cars ( Lionel) to the end of a doodlebug consist that runs on my own pike. My wife ( of course) insisted that that passenger trains do not carry freight cars. Sigh...

Last edited by electroliner
Originally Posted by Putnam Division:

I really would love to see some of those Marx mixed trains.  I wish the Greenberg books on Marx would be updated and re-released......they are out of site on the secondary market!

 

 

Peter

i had picked up a Marx mixed set from the 50's last year. if this is the kind of set you were referring too. sorry for the lack of quality photo. i could only find info about this set in one book, think the book was from 91, was a hardback, didnt catch the name.. i took a picture of the page for reference

 





 





 





The "Branchline Combines" that Mark S referred to on the Milw Rd were actually built on the same basic frames that their streamlined counterparts were built.  The "road" built them in their own shops and there were some 30 of them in various configurations.  So they might have shown up in most any parts of the system and they might have been either at the end of the train or directly behind the tender.

 

Couple of interesting points about them was that they were the only streamlined, lightweight cars that were built with coal stoves and oil lamps.  They had no electricity.  They were also built with open platforms at each end (except 10 that had RPO compartments) so the freight crews could use them in place of cabooses.

 

They were very interesting and different cars and I'd sure like to pick up a model of one for my "mixed trains" on my layout.

 

Paul Fischer

I'll tell you what, I only posted this topic to get the thoughts of the ol' timers here (and I mean that with much respect).  Can't say I'm new to the hobby, but since my father passed in May, I've gotten hot and heavy into it, both model railroad wise as well as 1:1 wise.  He was a big fan of both.  I spent last weekend in Strasburg with my mother, doing the museam thing and making her suffer through the model thing.  Good times.  I just wanted you guys to know I'm very envious of the knowledge here.  I only asked the question because I'm a few cars short on my PRR setup, and adding boxcars to it would make it look better (rather than Dorky...which my daughter would agree that I am 100%).  My mother is coming for Christmas, I brought my father's platform down here and have set it up as best as possible prior to her arrival.  I'm missing alot, but if she see's his trains run, as well as the excitement in my eyes watching her see them move, it'll be worth it.  Wasn't an easy task, and the wallet has definetely taken a hit, but its been worth it.  Joining this forum has helped me more than I can ever say.

 

Thank you folks, I look forward to buggin you with more of my "dumb" questions as I continue on through getting Dad's platform up to speed.  It has truly been a pleasure.  Thank you to everyone.

 

Joe

 

P.S...this is like my own personal History Channel, just that I don't have to set the DVR to record the shows at 1:am in the morning, seems the good ones only come on at those times.....

Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence:

Those are mail and express cars, not general merchandise freight.

 

Rusty

Don't think they are freight.

The PRR ran railroad express boxcars on passenger and express trains.

These cars were built with steam lines and high speed passenger trucks and were not intended for frieght service.

What I didn't mention above in my first post but have on several other threads was

the Beebe and Clegg book, "Mixed Train Daily".  That title says it all, for anyone who

is not a believer in freights run with passenger cars.   And as shown above, Marx made a LOT of mixed train sets,  in the early six inch windups through #1829 Hudson and #1095 plastic ATSF diesels in the later years.  What I have not seen is any but Santa Fe locos used in those diesel sets, although the rule with Marx is, anything is possible.  I have not seen the #333 Pacific used in a Marx mixed train set, either.

Marx was kind of a stickler for realism...which is why I think later 3/16 freight sets,

all with an NYC tender, came with a NYC caboose replacing the Reading caboose on earlier sets.  Most (I'd never swearall) of the later plastic sets had cabooses matching whatever tender.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×