Skip to main content

I figured it would be that time of the year with York returning this month to come up with some suggestions for Lionel regarding their American Flyer line.  Feel free to comment and add your own suggestions as this is my opinion but I am sure it may not be everyone’s.

 

The first thing I would do is reinstate the 57’ Mechanical Reefers but this time offer them as three car sets with different numbers.  I would be very clear that the problems with the Cylindrical Hoppers have been rectified on these items and spread the word thru clubs and online forums.  Three car sets with popular road names and graphics will sell well.  In addition this will go a long way to repairing the damage created previously with Lionel’s handling of the Cylindrical Hoppers.  At the same time I would suggest that Lionel publically restate their commitment to American Flyer and their intention to provide more modern rolling stock in the future.  This will only increase future sales that would be lost because customers are afraid Lionel is bailing on “S”.

 

Second, I would reinstate the Fastrack RR Crossing Gates and get the remote/command switches out.  I know the manual ones are available but these have been delayed too long.  I view these two items as tied together as Lionel’s customers do not see a commitment with these two items missing.  I have been seeing people on e-bay selling all their American Flyer Fastrack, which is a sign they lost faith in Lionel’s ability to follow through.

 

My third item is in regards to Accessories.  The reason why my friends who are into HO were going to try “S” was the action accessories.  So produce some new ones.  Reissue some of the Gilbert ones again with Sound chips and Command Control or look to repurpose “O” items that will work in “S”.  For example the Culvert Loader pipes fit in “S” gauge Gondolas.  But a minor adjustment to the tray and the replace of the “O” gauge man with and “S” gauge man, you have two new accessories that I would buy with no real tooling cost.  Since Lionel is reissuing the Culvert loaders this year for “O” it would be a perfect time to introduce it to “S”.

 

Fourth, Lionel should try to find out what their customers want.  For example I would suggest that they go to their customers and ask them about the following:

  1. Modern Rolling stock they would want in “S”
  2. Legacy Diesel they would want in “S”
  3. Legacy Steam Engine they would want in “S”

I would then compare the top 2 or 3 choices to what sells well in other scales to help make the correct decision on where to put their tooling money for the greatest sales.

 

Finally, me and my sons (and other families) LOVE Thomas the Tank Engine.  I bought my sons the Bachmann HO Thomas engines and when they were younger but they could not get them on the track as they were too small plus there were no Fun accessories.  They did not want the “O” scale Thomas because Thomas runs on 2 rails.  Here is what I call the Great Opportunity for “S” gauge.  Create a detailed Thomas the Tank Engine in “S” with his usually omitted front light, smoke and sound.  Make this your starter set and also reissue some accessories like the barrel loader and sawmill in Thomas colors.  Now with the Fastrack System (and hopefully switches) I think these will be a huge hit taking business away from Bachman and giving it to Lionel.

Anyway these are some of my suggestions for Lionel and American Flyer that I thought I would share with everyone.

 

--Rocco--

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Rocco:
 
Embedded comments...

 

The first thing I would do is reinstate the 57’ Mechanical Reefers but this time offer them as three car sets with different numbers.  I would be very clear that the problems with the Cylindrical Hoppers have been rectified on these items and spread the word thru clubs and online forums.  Three car sets with popular road names and graphics will sell well.  In addition this will go a long way to repairing the damage created previously with Lionel’s handling of the Cylindrical Hoppers.  At the same time I would suggest that Lionel publically restate their commitment to American Flyer and their intention to provide more modern rolling stock in the future.  This will only increase future sales that would be lost because customers are afraid Lionel is bailing on “S”.

 

The truck issue was only partially corrected.  The bolsters make the hopper sit way too high.  I'm not talking from a scale perspective but an esthetic perspective.  They just look too top heavy.

 

The car will track just fine even with deep flanges when the car is lowered to the proper height.

 

As far as the 57' reefers go, there was nothing wrong with the selection of road names previously offered.  For whatever reason, Lionel got cold feet.  If "lack of pre-orders" was the true reason, the announcement cancelling the cars should have been made within a week or two of the order cut-off date and not a week before they were scheduled to be delivered.  The 11th hour cancellation is what really soured folks.

 

Second, I would reinstate the Fastrack RR Crossing Gates and get the remote/command switches out.  I know the manual ones are available but these have been delayed too long.  I view these two items as tied together as Lionel’s customers do not see a commitment with these two items missing.  I have been seeing people on e-bay selling all their American Flyer Fastrack, which is a sign they lost faith in Lionel’s ability to follow through.

 

Yep.

 

My third item is in regards to Accessories.  The reason why my friends who are into HO were going to try “S” was the action accessories.  So produce some new ones.  Reissue some of the Gilbert ones again with Sound chips and Command Control or look to repurpose “O” items that will work in “S”.  For example the Culvert Loader pipes fit in “S” gauge Gondolas.  But a minor adjustment to the tray and the replace of the “O” gauge man with and “S” gauge man, you have two new accessories that I would buy with no real tooling cost.  Since Lionel is reissuing the Culvert loaders this year for “O” it would be a perfect time to introduce it to “S”.

 

Possibly a good idea, never really thought about it.

 

Fourth, Lionel should try to find out what their customers want.  For example I would suggest that they go to their customers and ask them about the following:

  1. Modern Rolling stock they would want in “S”
  2. Legacy Diesel they would want in “S”
  3. Legacy Steam Engine they would want in “S”

I would then compare the top 2 or 3 choices to what sells well in other scales to help make the correct decision on where to put their tooling money for the greatest sales.

 

Ask 5 model railroaders what they want and you get 8 different answers.  For the immediate future, my view is the scale and Legacy train have left the depot.  I won't be holding my breath for an upgraded Berkshire.

 

The short term future will likely be moderately detailed, traditional Flyer proportioned cars and FlyerChief  locomotives.  Not necessarily a bad thing for S as a whole.

 

Finally, me and my sons (and other families) LOVE Thomas the Tank Engine.  I bought my sons the Bachmann HO Thomas engines and when they were younger but they could not get them on the track as they were too small plus there were no Fun accessories.  They did not want the “O” scale Thomas because Thomas runs on 2 rails.  Here is what I call the Great Opportunity for “S” gauge.  Create a detailed Thomas the Tank Engine in “S” with his usually omitted front light, smoke and sound.  Make this your starter set and also reissue some accessories like the barrel loader and sawmill in Thomas colors.  Now with the Fastrack System (and hopefully switches) I think these will be a huge hit taking business away from Bachman and giving it to Lionel.

 

Personally, I'm not a big fan of Thomas (I did enjoy watching Thomas episodes on Shining Time Station.  Ringo was the quintessential Mr. Conductor/narrator..,) Polar Express or Hogwarts, but they have their place in the hobby.  If it helps to bring folks into S, I'm for it.

 

Rusty

 

Well, I talked with Lionel at the April York and wrote an article about the interview for the S Gaugian for the July/August edition.  Here it is in case you would like to see what I was told.  (Some of the spacing and numbering was lost in the copy and paste)

______________________________

 

  1. 2015 Catalog Questions
    1. You show the passenger cars for the D&H and SP in the 2015 catalog, but not the diesels for them that were in the 2014 catalog.  I am told dealers have been informed that there are no more engines available to order.  What meaning does this have for buyers?

Based on customer feedback, Lionel added passenger cars to support the D&H and SP locos after the ALCo PA’s were catalogued.  Both the PA’s and the passenger cars are due to ship in the spring/summer of 2015. Hopefully those who didn’t originally put in an order for one of those PA’s are still able to locate one from a dealer or the second hand market as I don’t forsee extra engines to be available at Lionel’s end.

 

  1. Will the Berkshires in the 2015 catalog be different than the Polar Express Berkshire in any way other than the elongated cow catcher and engine headlight?

We’re very excited about the release of this engine not only in the Polar Express decoration but also in the real railroad schemes. All of them share the same FlyerChief features set which includes ElectroCoupler, Speed Control, firebox flickering,  smoke, Railsounds, and on/off switches.  We think its important too that all the engines can be controlled by either the remote control that’s included with the engines and set or by a traditional transformer.  As for the differences, you’re correct that those details you  mention are the difference between the models.   

 

  1. Last year I asked you if a future Berkshire with more scale features would be produced for Flyer.  You thought it could happen.  Is that still a possibility and if so how soon?

Lionel has discussed offering an even higher detailed version of the Berkshire in the future, one that might even possibly operate from the Legacy system.  This is still a possibility for a future run of the AF Berkshire down the road, but at present we feel strongly that the FlyerChief version of this engine with the current detailing is very nice engine that we are able to offer at a decent price.   Honestly it will be at least a few years before we take a serious look at offering the Berkshires with any difference in details and operating system.  

 

  1. There are no new Legacy engines in the catalog and the new ones are Flyer Chief.  It looking in the O Gauge catalog it seems that most new products are Lion Chief. In the future will there be Legacy products as well as Flyer Chief or is Lionel shifting away from Legacy for S?   

As you know Lionel has been quite assertive over the last few years in its release of a wide selection of new scale engines and scale rolling stock.  Since our release of the semi-scale Big Boy a handful of years back, it’s been clear that many of our customers and other S Gaugers were “chomping at the bit” for something new in the S Gauge line. And we’ve  been excited to expand our S product line toward that demand. Admittedly though it has been a bumpy road navigating our efforts to the needs of both highrailers and scale operatiors, and this has created some confusion in the marketplace and some issues with our product and efforts.  With the cost of new tooling and parts continuing to be on the increase, Lionel wants to be doubly sure that the product we offer meets the demands of our customers, and in turn that  our customers are willing and able to support our efforts with strong orders.   We feel that 2015 is a good year to regroup on our efforts in scale products to make sure our next scale offering is a strong one.  Additionally, we are excited about the soon-to-be release of our new scale-sized Berkshire and want to make sure we don’t step ahead of ourselves with other new engines before it has a chance to be operated by our customers.  

 

  1. The catalog shows no new products for S Scale people.  Are there plans to produce products that use scale wheel sets in the future?

There are ongoing discussions at Lionel regarding our best option for satisfying the scale guys in terms of proper scale wheel sets.

 

  1. When Lionel cancels a product like the mechanical reefers and the two Berkshire trains sets introduced in the 2014 catalog can you explain what factors cause that type of a decision? 

Most often a dropped product for companies like Lionel is based on two main factors: the cost of the project to produce and the number of orders coming in to support it. With train sets the variables can get even more complex, considering the fact that the locomotives and rolling stock are not always made at the same location, don’t have the same requirements regarding quantities, etc.  Ultimately as you know Lionel chose to offer the Berkshires all as separate sale locomotives except for the Polar Express RTR train set.

 

  1. You canceled the mechanical reefers this past year.  Are there any plans to try to make them again?  Are there any plans for other modern cars to be produced?

It’s possible that the reefers could be considered again in the future, but we are certainly considering a variety of different scale freight cars.  Modern cars in particular is an area that we have looked into closely.

 

  1. The 49876 water tower w/shed is now being delivered and it appears too large for S and almost O.  Also, it is not “toy like” most accessories for O and S are, but seems to be a scale type item.  Can you give the background on this accessory and if Lionel has plans to do more items like it?

I think this accessory is quite realistic and would look good on either an S Gauge or an O Gauge layout.  I don’t believe we’ve ever advertised this as a true scale-size piece, but instead we’ve focused on realistic look and details of this accessory.  With that said, as we move forward with other ideas for new accessories we will take close consideration of true scale for these items. 

 

 

  1. Has the backlog of the west coast ports slowed down Lionel’s ability to deliver products to dealers and customers?

I do think Lionel has been affected as so many other companies have been with issues at the ports, but it’s not an area of business here that I have connection with. 

 

  1. There seems to be a shortage of the traditional Flyer type wide radius track so it demands very high prices in the market.  Has Lionel considered manufacturing it again?

We have considered it yes, but we are most interested in supporting our new FasTrack system. I would not expect Lionel to offer the traditional style track anytime soon.

 

  1. Are there any plans to reissue Flyer accessories that can be operated with the Legacy system?

While there have been some thoughts about this at Lionel, we haven’t planned this out as part of our line in the near future. If there are a few specific accessories that Flyers would be most excited about seeing in our Legacy system, please let us know!

 

  1. Will Lionel be making “Plug & Play” Fastrack sections for S Gauge track?

Once Lionel has finished with its release of the core FasTrack pieces including switches etc, we will take a serious looking at the PlugnPlay system in regards to American Flyer.  So much new development has gone into our O Gauge PlugnPlay system and are just now making it out to the market.  We will certainly discuss our options as it could apply to the S Gauge line.

 

  1. On the various toy train forums there is discussion about, “Did Lionel receive the orders that were anticipated for that Polar Express set?”  How does the Lionel management feel about the order volume for the set?

While orders were not as strong as we expected, we feel there are a lot of train fans who are waiting to see the product before they commit, and we feel there is a lot of anticipation and excitement about the set. We feel strongly this set will become a core RTR train set in the Flyer line for years, just as it has in our O Gauge line.     

 

 

  1. Does your company have any plans to issue or reissue smaller steam locomotives like a Pacific, Consolidation, Mogul, or a switcher?

We definitely have discussed offering an additional smaller engine or switcher to our Flyer line.

 

  1. Does your company look at the top sellers in your O gauge product line when it considers what to build in S?

So much has been offered already in O Gauge as well as the S Gauge market.  In some cases we certainly find that a new item for our S Gauge line is represented in our O Gauge line. But we don’t specifically look at our O gauge line to make a decision.

 

  1. Will your company consider going to meets that are specific to S gauge to show your S gauge product line and listen to hobbyists about their needs and reactions to what you are selling?

We will consider S Gauge shows yes. It’s true though that we have to choose carefully what main shows we go to, and a bulk of this does typically support our much larger line of O Gauge scale and traditional products.

 

 

  1. What are your company’s plans to attract new modelers to S gauge?

With the completion of our FasTrack system of AF track, Lionel is nicely propped to attract new train operators to S Gauge with RTR trains sets like the Polar Express and other future RTR sets.  We feel strongly that the first step in building this market and bringing in new customers is to make it as easy and as fun to enter the hobby as possible! 

Last edited by Roundhouse Bill

Manufacturers can maximize investments by using the same tooling for “new” products sold at the same or close to the same price as the original products that absorbed the initial cost of the tooling. American Flyer/Lionel has done this for over 60 years with rolling stock and locomotives. Lionel’s S gauge introductions had some teething problems, but a few tweaks here and there could allow them to reintroduce them with more favorable response.

 

The Polar Express and the subsequent Berkshire engines indicate that American Flyer can fall into two categories: “toy” trains that work as high-rail products with lower price points (Polar Express) and more highly detailed, more expensive high-rail products that can also attract scale modelers willing to make some modifications starting as simply as replacing wheelsets (SD70ACe, ES44AC). Lionel may be reluctant to put its foot into the second category again after the response to the cylindrical hoppers and the tepid response to mechanical reefers, but those reactions stemmed from its own mistakes or their own misreading of the market.  The Y-3 and the ES44AC are proof that when Lionel addresses the little flaws, the resulting products are terrific.

 

With little extra investment, Lionel could reissue some older products with minor updates:

  • U33C
    • change the electronics to the latest AC/DC/DCC capability
    • change the pilots to the ingenious pivoting pilots used on the SD70 and ES44
    • ensure that the wheel arrangement is as good as it is on the ES44 and revised SD70
    • issue new numbers; tone down the red LED light in back
  • SD70ACe/ES44AC

    • New cab with the headlight in the nose like 94% of the real locomotives on the road
    • New numbers/road names in non-glossy paint schemes
  • Pacific/Mikados

    • change the electronics to the latest AC/DC/DCC capability
  • cylindrical hoppers

    • revise the bolster
      • lower, more prototypical position
      • change construction so that it is easy to replace wheelsets for scale wheels
    • offer fewer fantasy paint schemes in favor of prototypical versions (with multiple numbers)

Only relatively slight changes are required to revive these products. If a 40-ft boxcar can be “reborn” every year for over six decades with just a repaint, surely a little effort can bring some more return on the original investment for these items.

As far as new products go, there is always the revival of the mechanical reefer. The most common rolling stock missing from S gauge is the autorack. Its length may pose problems, but O gauge has found some workarounds for that.

 

There is no need to offer both high-rail and scale versions of each product as long as Lionel also offers scale wheels (not wheel-truck combinations) and a simple method of replacing the high-rail wheels. Packaging both a high-rail version and a scale version is too expensive and difficult to manage in terms of inventory and sales. Steam locomotives are an exception because there is no simple way to swap out wheels.

 

Perhaps the Lion Chief category could expand to include both power systems and value priced basic systems and the Legacy category expand to include advanced control systems and the more highly detailed high-rail offerings with the option of replacing wheelsets for scale wheelsets. (The two categories would be simpler to distinguish than Rail King/Imperial/Premier.)  

Originally Posted by Rocco:

....Create a detailed Thomas the Tank Engine in “S” with his usually omitted front light, smoke and sound.

 

--Rocco--

Rocco,

 

Sounds good, but Thomas (if offered in well proportioned 1:64) is a SMALL (but very useful) engine.  The boiler is smaller than anything else in S, and although mine has the chuff unit from the original Docksider chassis, I couldn't fit in the HO smoke unit.  As far as fitting in a sound system, it would be EXTREMELY difficult.  Even the motor was a challenge to fit in.  Notice the modification to the motor bracket:

 

 

Thomas chassis

 

 

Thomas Finished

I suppose you could eliminate the mechanical chuff unit altogether and replace it with an electronic one, but it would have to be SMALL.  And would Lionel invest in such a unique item?  On the other hand, once developed, it could be used in almost any locomotive.  But you could never squeeze in Legacy or any more circuitry in Thomas!  Mine is straight DC, and just the circuitry for the directional lights was tough to fit (it goes behind the motor).

 

HOWEVER,,,if anybody at Lionel R&D is reading this forum, I'd be willing to lend them my Thomas for development.  Just give me the certifiably first Thomas set off the line in exchange.  Isn't that somewhat how the Gilbert Frontiersman set was done??? 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Thomas chassis
  • Thomas Finished

A coup of replies in one.

 

Roundhouse Bill: I resubscribed to the S Gaugian because of you article.  Thanks for sharing it again.

 

TOKELLY: I like some of your enhancement ideas, especially the Cylindrical Hoppers.  I really want more Legacy and less Lionel Chief.  Having said that I wonder how difficult it would be to offer the same engine with either Lionel Chief or Legacy under the built to order model. I also would love Autoracks!

 

PONIJA: I know Bachmann is offering an HO Thomas with sound.  I do not have your expertise regarding the smoke issue.  I just see this as a great opportunity to grow S if Lionel has the S License.  If not I wonder if MTH would be interested in stepping in to a possible kids intro to S market.

 

banjoflyer: I agree I think with some minor tooling they should be able to make a center beam car.

 

--Rocco--

Ok, before I comment, I am an ogauger. Always have been and will be (at least for the next 10yrs.) Now, some things I would like to see is only this....

THAT THEY USE THAT K-LINE TOOLING THAT HAS BEEN SITTING AROUND. Yes, I know that making k-line tooling for o gauge run on S-gauge is costly, but think of all those models that could be made with that tooling. I personally would like to see some new things for my fellow modelers, (even if they are in a different scale.) Correct me if I am wrong on this. It is just an idea.

Nickstrains

Originally Posted by Nicks Trains:

Ok, before I comment, I am an ogauger. Always have been and will be (at least for the next 10yrs.) Now, some things I would like to see is only this....

THAT THEY USE THAT K-LINE TOOLING THAT HAS BEEN SITTING AROUND. Yes, I know that making k-line tooling for o gauge run on S-gauge is costly, but think of all those models that could be made with that tooling. I personally would like to see some new things for my fellow modelers, (even if they are in a different scale.) Correct me if I am wrong on this. It is just an idea.

Nickstrains

Hi Nickstrains,

 

It's not a new idea here in S-Land.  Some things are converted nicely, but most aren't.  Installing S gauge trucks under an O gauge item works in very few cases.  Lionel tried that with their "ducking giraffe" car a few years ago, and the proverbial lead balloon flew better.  OTOH, the Industrial Rail caboose with S trucks works great.  I'm not familiar with the K-Line offerings, but their boxcar (according to some vocal folks in S) doesn't have a prototype, therefore is unworthy of traversing two-rail track.  I personally like it. 

 

Rocco,

 

Smaller smoke units are out there, but on my Thomas I cut up a Flyer docksider for the chassis.  More modern smoke units are out of my comfort zone.   Sound boards are small, so having one in HO isn't surprising.  It's the reverse unit and smoke issues that may be the stumbling blocks.  And there's a sizable contingent of S gaugers who like the modern electronics, which will NOT fit without a major shrinking of the circuit boards.  Lionel reportedly had a hard time fitting it into the Polar Express, so fitting it into Thomas....  As far as MTH making a Thomas, that would only happen, I think, if Lionel allows them to do so, since they have the license to make Thomas.  But then, I don't know the details of their licensing agreement.  Lionel makes a G and O gauge Thomas, so maybe it includes their whole product line.  Your other suggestions are right on!

 

Banjoflyer

 

Your suggestion of a center beam flatcar and auto rack are great!  I'd love to see them too.

 

TOKELLY,

 

Modern equipment would also be nice to see, but you hit the nail on the head with the reluctance of some folks to go with Lionel offerings.  They need to get it right the first time.

 

And even though Thomas might not be everyone's cup of tea, you could always put him on a depressed center flatcar and have him as a load being transported to venues like the Henry Ford's Greenfield Village where he runs for three weekends in a row to sell-out performances.  But as an aside, the locomotive actually is transported on a lowboy trailer over the highways.  How do I know?  I work at the Village an watched him arrive and put on the tracks.  Next time, I'll make a video of it and post it.  Very cool to see!

 

As far as what I'd like to see?  I'm interested in passenger trains, and an Amtrak modern diesel would be nice.  But only American Models makes passenger cars, although they're the Superliner ones.  Lionel could easily simply paint the Flyer streamlined ones in Amtrak colors and they would be just fine as the "heritage" fleet.  Like this American Models Budd:

 

 

Amtrak Budd

More than my 2 cents, I know.... sorry.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Amtrak Budd
Last edited by poniaj
Originally Posted by poniaj:
Originally Posted by Nicks Trains:

Ok, before I comment, I am an ogauger. Always have been and will be (at least for the next 10yrs.) Now, some things I would like to see is only this....

THAT THEY USE THAT K-LINE TOOLING THAT HAS BEEN SITTING AROUND. Yes, I know that making k-line tooling for o gauge run on S-gauge is costly, but think of all those models that could be made with that tooling. I personally would like to see some new things for my fellow modelers, (even if they are in a different scale.) Correct me if I am wrong on this. It is just an idea.

Nickstrains

Hi Nickstrains,

 

It's not a new idea here in S-Land.  Some things are converted nicely, but most aren't.  Installing S gauge trucks under an O gauge item works in very few cases.  Lionel tried that with their "ducking giraffe" car a few years ago, and the proverbial lead balloon flew better.  OTOH, the Industrial Rail caboose with S trucks works great.  I'm not familiar with the K-Line offerings, but their boxcar (according to some vocal folks in S) doesn't have a prototype, therefore is unworthy of traversing two-rail track.  I personally like it. 

 


 

The old Marx freight car tooling K-Line had is just a shade north of S in size.  K-Line did offer them with Flyer compatible trucks.  They still are readily available at S-Fests, S-Spree's and NASG conventions.  Even at 10-15 bucks, the piles of cars never seem to go down, proving that just putting S trucks under some warmed-over leftover tooled cars doesn't make them marketable. 

 

The K-Line Big Boy sorta worked (about 1:60 scale) as long as one didn't park it next to the scale sized Challenger of couple from 2011.  The K-Line Allegheny is even bigger, being about 1:58 scale.

 

Personally, I'd rather see reissued stuff based on Gilbert tooling than the leftovers.

 

The old Industrial Rail caboose is spot on for S:

rSFC 042714 06a

Although lower in resolution than the SouthWind Model caboose behind it, it scales out just a scale inch or two short than the prototype.

 

As far as MTH goes, as long as the goal posts for the F3's keep moving ever three month's or so, I wouldn't expect anything newly tooled, Thomas or otherwise, in S from them.  The only thing "new" so far from MTH is the piggy-back flat cars and they're not on the street yet.

 

Rusty

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • rSFC 042714 06a
Last edited by Rusty Traque

I think reissuing the Mikado and Pacific with Legacy would be great. I would like to see a Hudson with Legacy but I do not expect that to happen. I am puzzled why American Models can produce a variety of engines yet Lionel cannot. I have all my AM engines retrofitted with TMCC and Railsounds, so when I look at that total cost (purchase price +retrofit costs) it should be profitable for Lionel to sell at that price point. A Legacy equipped Berkshire would also be nice.

The TMCC equipped Mikado is a relatively small engine. If you want to see what can be done to improve that engine with currently available electronics, motors and smoke units watch the video on Carl Tuveson's website.

This is a game we play every year, and it seems as time goes on there is less optimism that we will win this game - heck, there's even fewer people playing the game now (this used to be a topic that would get 100 + replies). You people are all waisting your time!!!

 

  1. Rocco hit it on the head.  57' reefers.  Try it again, tell us they won't suck and tell us that they are part of the BTO model. I will preorder if it is recataloged.  If not the 57'ers, Lionel please give us some other modern scale freight car(s) to run behind the beautiful SD70s and ES44s.  And they are nice engines!!!
  2. Recatalog a grade crossing, I would prefer the lighted gate crossing but really any will do at this point. Take a look at the tooling please Lionel and see if you can make that goofy frog look better on your turnouts.
  3. Reuse that Mikado tooling, look how many road names Lionel spit out for the light and heavy Mikes In O. The only explanation that seems to make sense here with the lack of Mikado offerings is that Lionel does not have the tolling anymore for the S gauge model (maybe a casualtie of the Sanda Kahn fiasco?). 
  4. The PE set is awesome! Even with the issues.  But we need more than a fantasy set for the RTR market. Put the flyer chief system in a Geep or Baldwin and get a 4 or 5 car set out there.
  5. My only request for a newly tooled Legacy piece - SD40-2. We have had multiple threads discussing the justification for this one. I would buy one, more than one...I would make you take my money for this one Lionel! 
  6. This one is more of a request in detail change - the flyerchief Berks, you are disappointing us somewhat with the cast in handrails, it is what it is I guess, but PLEASE put a more realistic coal load in the tender. The PE Berk's coal load will just not do on the separate sale Berk's. 
  7. A Legacy Big Boy with whistle steam.   (So I lied in #5) 

 

Thats more than enough for now. I hope the 2016 AF catalog has me excited like every other one (except 2015) did. 

 

Ben

 

Originally Posted by NotInWI:

This is a game we play every year, and it seems as time goes on there is less optimism that we will win this game - heck, there's even fewer people playing the game now (this used to be a topic that would get 100 + replies). You people are all waisting your time!!!

 

Part of the reason is these kind of threads set up unrealistic expectations.  We all have our own preferences and biases for what we think will be in the next catalog and a sure fire seller.  In one of the past threads, some had firmly believed a Flyer SD40-2 would be in the next catalog.

 

Then when the catalog comes out...

 

I'm at the point where vapor products are of little interest to me.  Even the stuff that's going to be made is taking forever to finally show up on store shelves.  At this point in my life, products announced today very likely won't show up until after I retire in a few years. Even my patience has worn thin.

 

While there's a couple of items still in my personal preorder pipeline, I've pretty much shut down the thought of preordering future locomotives at this point, so fantasizing about future offerings is indeed a waste of time. 

 

There are still one or two special locomotives I would be in for, but they are even less likely to be made than a scale Flyer SD40-2.

 

Time to start concentrating on the old project backlog instead.

 

Rusty

Well if we want to turn this into a wish list I would suggest 3 different categories

 

1) Best for the growth of "S" Gauge

2) Best for Lionel's profits in "S" Gauge

3) Best for my personal want in "S" Gauge

 

So what are my answers to the above?

 

1) Best for the growth of "S" Gauge - I would say Lionel should make Thomas the Tank engine in "S" along with all his other engines.  Repurpose AF accessories and turn them into Thomas accessories such as  Thomas and the Barrel loader or Thomas and the Cow on the track.  This would take business away from Bachman big time.

 

2) Best for Lionel's profits in "S" Gauge - I would say new Passenger cars (maybe smooth sided but I'm not sure) with detailed interiors and proper lengths. This new tooling could be used again and again for different road names with Lionel certainly getting their investment back on this tooling.

 

3) Best for my personal want in "S" Gauge - Have always wanted and admired the GS4 Southern Pacific Daylight steam engine.  I have always been drawn to it an it would be a must have with a Legacy option available.

 

--Rocco--

The Lionel O gauge Thrall Car Center Beam bulkhead flat car is very close to a 1/64th scale version of the 1970's era 60'-64' long Center Beam Flat Car model. It is missing the spools to hold the cables used to tie-down the lumber.

It should be possible to convince the people at Lionel to sell the Center Beam bulkhead flat cars with S gauge trucks for various railroads.

Andrew

I know i say it alot, but since we brought this up again, SD40-2.....i prefer Conrail, CSX, Norfolk Southern, SOO, BN, C&NW, UP, CN, Santa Fe, Rio Grande......

Ben, feel free to jump in here and put your 2 cent in here. Or anyone else for that matter. Im hoping if i bring this up enough, maybe just maybe Lionel will see it and actually go through with it.

If LIONEL would make these, i know theyd have a smash hit. Just sayin....

Last edited by snowmanw900

Respectfully, you guys are all over the board on this. I can see why Lionel/MTH/whomever would have a tough time deciding what to make. Heck, my wish is for traditional GP 7/9's (with paint schemes not already done) and a couple of sets headed by those GP's. I don't care much for the scale stuff but some of you do so that's good. Imagine the selection we'd have if Menards started producing S gauge cars?

Steve

Last edited by RideTheRails

If Lionel utilized the modular tooling technology that allowed them to make the SD38, SD40 and SD45 in O Gauge I think they would get the most bang for the buck.  Soo, UP, C&NW, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Central, BN, DMIR, SantaFe...that list can go on forever.  A lot of the rolling stock that's out there that we have to call "modern" would fit in well behind them, at least better then what we are trying to make work with SD70s and ES44s. 

Ben

RideTheRails posted:

Respectfully, you guys are all over the board on this. I can see why Lionel/MTH/whomever would have a tough time deciding what to make. Heck, my wish is for traditional GP 7/9's (with paint schemes not already done) and a couple of sets headed by those GP's. I don't care much for the scale stuff but some of you do so that's good. Imagine the selection we'd have if Menards started producing S gauge cars?

Steve

Unfortunately, that's the nature of "what would you like" threads.  The O Gaugers don't stay on the map very well, either.  I've seen some pretty obscure requests for stuff over there.

Part of the problem is that it appears that Lionel tries to treat S like O (see zombie, mint cars, or an overload of fantasy cylindrical hoppers...) rather than looking at what has worked for AM and the former SHS and building off of that.  I suppose the new woodside reefer is thinking along those lines and only time will tell if it's successful.

Another part is Lionel seems to want to start over from scratch every few years.  If they want to stick to traditional type Flyer products, fine... run with it.  The Northerns look great, the PA's are classic, but it's all recycling.  It's kinda like the way the O gauge line was in the 80's: Same stuff, new paint.

The FlyerChief GP has some good potential, especially with the changes being made to it.  Of course, we really need to see a (pre)production sample rather than a Photoshopped representation.  Updated, but it's still recycling what's been out there for decades.  I sorta think a FlyerChief U33C might be a good idea as a next step.

As to Menards...  Don't hold your breath, although I think offering some of their structures in S might be a good way to test the waters.

Rusty

I know that fantasy cars such as waking zombie, mint cars, or an overload of fantasy cylindrical hoppers don't sell well in S but that is not what Lionel should be looking at.  There are certain items that sell well in all scales.  It is those items that Lionel should give greater focus to.  To David's point, the Southern Pacific Daylight GS4 sells well in all scales.  They can get multiple paint styles out of it and much of the tooling can be reused for other engines.  There is nothing that says it would not sell well in "S".  Yes I know Lionel is afraid of the tooling cost but if they take all the money they wasted on tooling items that no one asked for and  instead put it to items that would be a sure thing they would see a better return on their investment.

--Rocco--

Thats exactly my thoughts! Trade the zombie cars, cylindrical hopper and mint cars , and if they would have invested that tooling and ideas in modern Gons, Tankers and ttx flat cars,  they woulda been wayyyyyyyyy far ahead compared to whats available.

What makes me sad is, those cylindrical cars had GREAT GREAT detail and potential.  If they would have choose a more modern design, those would have done really well.

 

Its sad when id rather run my conrail 3 bay covered hoppers made by AM over running a very detailed but extremely outta date hopper car thats made by Lionel with a SD70 Engine that Lionel made!!

Last edited by snowmanw900

After all that NS and other fantasy stuff hanging around for several catalogs (also, notice no new roadnames on the waffle boxcars or other traditional Gilbert freight cars?  The Baldwin sets seem to be house cleaning... )

I think Lionel is looking only for home runs now like the Berkshires.  The current batch of Northerns seem to be selling OK, but I don't think they're moving out like the Berks did.

I don't deny a GS4 or a "J" wouldn't sell.  I really wonder why Lionel hasn't thought of it.  They have the research for both.

Here's the 5 basic paint schemes with some lettering variations for the GS4:

GS4 paint

As to reusing tooling...  The GS4 had 80" drivers, so the mechanism would be good for other 80" drivered 4-8-4's, but little else would be reusable for other road's Northerns.  The SP GS2 and GS6 classes had 73" drivers, a significant difference.  The J had 70" drivers.

You could probably get away with using the UP Northern drive for a Daylight, but the J would have to be stretched to fit and would probably look very awkward.

Rusty

Attachments

Images (1)
  • GS4 paint
snowmanw900 posted:

 

What makes me sad is, those cylindrical cars had GREAT GREAT detail and potential.  If they would have choose a more modern design, those would have done really well.

Agreed, they could've chosen a more contemporary car to go with the SD70's and ES44's.

But, what really torpedoed the cylindrical hoppers was the whole truck issue.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

I've held off on this because I think Lionel has given up on the scale side, but here goes...

This could be a very big list, but I'll try to keep it to my top requests. All are scale/detailed, engines are Legacy/DCC equipped.

Steam: Scale wheel versions of the Mikado and Pacific, B&O Q4b Mikado, NYC Hudson, N&W J, SP GS4 Daylight, NKP Berkshire, Erie K5 Pacific and S4 Berkshire, PRR K4

Diesels: GP30, GP40-2, SD40-2, SD90/43, Tier IV Gevo, Alco RS 1/2/3, E7

Passenger: Heavyweight and Streamline full length cars with detailed interiors and constant LED lights

Freight: Milk Cars, anything truly modern

Track: Make numbered turnouts. Having radiused turnouts makes it all but impossible to create a parallel passing siding. #4,#5,#6 should be a start. Curved turnouts would be welcome as well.

I am not under any delusion that we will see any of this list, but that's what I would like to see.

I would add that while a lot of folks here like toy trains and AF, the only segments of the hobby that are actually growing are squarely in the scale modeling category. If Lionel wants to remain relevant in the future they better get onboard with scale trains both in S and O. I'm just one customer but they have literally lost thousands of dollars a year in revenue from me. How many more people are out there like me? Just a thought.

Last edited by jonnyspeed
Roundhouse Bill posted:

Jonathan:  I think you are wrong about the Scale segment of the hobby growing.  When I talk with Lionel and MTH they say it is shrinking and too demanding.  No way can they meet what Scale people want at the price they want to pay for it.

Then how come the former SHS could and American Models can?

Yup. As I suspected, it's the customer's fault....

I guess it was too demanding for Lionel to design and mount a freight car truck properly and MTH to get on the stick to release more of the former SHS line.

I guess both companies were too busy trying to reinvent the wheel rather than use what worked for 20+ year for SHS and 30+ years for AM.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque
Roundhouse Bill posted:

Jonathan:  I think you are wrong about the Scale segment of the hobby growing.  When I talk with Lionel and MTH they say it is shrinking and too demanding.  No way can they meet what Scale people want at the price they want to pay for it.

Bill, my statement was not just about S. I was speaking across ALL scales. O scale 2R and 3R are shrinking. G scale is a shadow of it's former self. ONLY HO, N, and to a lesser degree Z scale are growing.  What do all of those have in common? They are all 2 rail scale models. They aren't toys. New people into the hobby want scale fidelity and accuracy.

AF in its prime was cutting edge. It was the best that technology of the day could make. That isn't true today in S. But it is in HO, N, and Z. 

New people want scale trains. Like it or not that is true. MTH knows this. They barely dabble in G, O scale get zero new tooling, and all of their R&D money has gone into HO and their new DCS app. 

Final point to make, just look at the number of existing and new manufacturers in HO. There are several new companies in the last 5 years. Companies like ScaleTrains are doing unbelievable things in plastic and they are able to bring it out at a price point that is obscenely low. $~200 for a DCC sound equipped SD40-2 that has better and more accurate details than any SD40-2 ever made in any material? What do we get from AF? A Berk with no add-on details and a second rate control/sound system?

If we are going to have a discussion we need to be able to be honest. Are there people who for nostalgic purposes like toy trains? Of course! Is that market growing? No... Is it contracting? Yes, every year... Are the smaller "scales" growing? Regardless of whether the overall size of model railroading is actually shrinking the fact is that only HO, N, and Z seem to be pulling in new modelers.

So, as I said... Unless Lionel starts to offer scale trains again I believe they will eventually run out of customers to sustain the AF brand. In my opinion, if S has any long-term future I think it will have to pull people in from other scales. You aren't going to pull an HO modeler in with an AF Berkshire. Making compelling scale models is the only way to tempt people away from other scales.

I totally disagree with the last part of your statement... Lionel made critical missteps in the prototypes and features over the last 5 years that prevented them from being successful. That's because they don't understand the scale mentality. I personally spend many thousands per year on my hobby. I have my name on the list for 2 River Raisin Q4b mikados (~$5k) if they get made. I recently bought 4 of SMMWs Resin flat car kits for over $300.  I'm 43 years old and I'm spending money in S scale. Lionel isn't getting a penny if they don't bring me something I'm interested in.  My point isn't to brag. My point is that there is a market that is willing to spend more, they have just totally and utterly missed the mark.

My 2 cents...

Last edited by jonnyspeed

How about:

A Reading T1 - there are many engines and paint jobs - standard service, rambles, American Freedom Train, C &O, D&H, etc along with different cab numbers.

A Reading G3 pacific - Not going to happen, I know.

A Reading VO-1000 - basically the AF Baldwin with a green paint job.

I could live with a C&O Greenbriar (which is close to a T1)

Probably won't live to see any of the above.

 

 

 

 

Bill,

To a large extent I do agree with Jonathan.  Lionel seems to have no continuity in their vision for S gauge.  Quite a few years ago they tried to put S Trucks on O scale cars and it failed.  Management said they would not do that again.  Look at the 2017 Catalog, they are trying again with the Auto-carriers.  And again it will fail and they will blame the customer.  They start issuing modern engines and after a misstep with the Hoppers and then stop releasing more modern freight.  It seems that we keep changing managers of the line and all the history goes out the door.  When I spoke with Mike Regan at a Trainland appearance he had stated the Fastrack RR crossing was cancelled because of cost but they were going to come out with separate crossing gates and a track trip to close them as well as a planned Fastrack signal system for S.  Now that he is gone again all that gets lost and we have to start over with a new team.  It's very frustrating where we see time and time again that customers on this forum and others ask Lionel to make a GS4 Southern Pacific Daylight Steam engine or a GP40-2 Diesel and Lionel makes something else that was not on anyones top 100 list.  I am not a scale person but I want scale proportioned cars.  At least if they committed to that the scale people would be happy and so would the operators.  I believe it would increase S sales.  I also don't want to say there is no room in S for other types of trains.  The Polar Express sold very well.  I was at a train dealer this past week and they felt with the success of the S Polar express Lionel should now make a Thomas the Tank Engine in S scale as a 2 rail Thomas would sell well and compete against Backmann. 

All the above requires a consistent vision and a plan that is shaped by listening to their customers and learning from what sells well in other scales.  It's almost a can't miss model that Lionel somehow continues to fail on the execution.

--Rocco--

 

 

I think Lionel can best serve its own interests and those of the S gauge community by doing more of what Lionel does uniquely and best, bringing to market new Legacy and FlyerChief engines. 

They have an S track system, the best transformer ever made in the ZW-L, Legacy, FlyerChief, the LCS and the mobile device apps. All these work in S. Lionel seems to really struggle and fails to get the freight cars right. Perhaps now that the S FasTrack system is established maybe it is time for them to consider some correctly scaled freight cars that need a 27"R minimum. 

 

Rocco and others, while this site and a few others have probably less than 100 people regularly writing on them.  Those of us who enjoy writing are a minute segment of the overall S market.  Plus a disproportionate number of people here are scale.  Lionel must feel they know to play their customer base in S.

Things change and what was said year's ago about not selling O gauge cars on S gauge trucks must have changed in the mind of Lionel's decision makers.  From what I am hearing, a lot of people are ordering the auto carriers.  I know I did.

It is hard to look into their decision making because Lionel mostly won't tell you.  From interviewing people from Lionel over the years for the S Gaugian, it is my belief that decisions are made in the short run and not toward a number of years for S production.  S is just not a major player for them like we wish it was.  I can tell you I get the same reaction to every Lionel person I have interviewed.  They feel we expect too much and that there is no end to the number of different items we want.

I am going to start the process of putting together the questions I will ask Lionel and MTH for my interview at York in April.  As I did last year I will ask people here for some suggested questions. 

 

Roundhouse Bill posted:

  Plus a disproportionate number of people here are scale.  Lionel must feel they know to play their customer base in S.

Somehow, I doubt that.  Seems like most of them have retreated back to the YaHoo board or S Scale Sig.  There's probably a greater number of HiRail here folks than scale, although their wants would be similar.

It is hard to look into their decision making because Lionel mostly won't tell you.  From interviewing people from Lionel over the years for the S Gaugian, it is my belief that decisions are made in the short run and not toward a number of years for S production.  

That's been pretty obvious over the past few years...  It gives the perception of instability to the customer base.

S is just not a major player for them like we wish it was.

Of course not, especially when they keep changing their focus.

 I can tell you I get the same reaction to every Lionel person I have interviewed.  

Once again, they seem to fail to understand what works for the S market overall.  AM's been doing it well for 30+ years (and AM didn't initially offer their product in HiRail/Flyer compatible versions.)  SHS did it very well for 20+ years before the Sanda Kan purge hit.

This is the magnificent Lionel/Flyer ES44 straight out of the box.  Flyer couplers, deep flange Flyer wheels:

KCS ES44 011115 002

This is a Lionel/Flyer ES44: scale wheels, Kadee couplers (and I had to pay extra for both...)

ES44AC 012615 003

Just how hard was it for Lionel to do???

Too hard I guess...  Yet American Models can do it. Their latest, the RS11 is just as well detailed as the ES44 and is selling to both Flyer/Hirail and Scale folks.

And oh yeah...  Those modern cars in the background come with HiRail wheels and Flyer compatible couples INSTALLED.  It's up to the purchaser to change to the supplied scale wheels and purchase Kadee couplers if they so desire.    ...AND they cost about 15 bucks LESS than a current traditional Gilbert-copy boxcar.

They feel we expect too much and that there is no end to the number of different items we want.

As opposed to the barrage of want's they get from the 3-rail side?  Somewhere in out collective list of unreasonable wants there must be some common ground in the list, and I don't think that common ground desires zombie cars, O27 cars on S trucks, scaled down O27 cars or fantasy paint jobs.

Rusty

 

 

 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • ES44AC 012615 003
  • KCS ES44 011115 002
Last edited by Rusty Traque

Does HO scale offer disproportionate looking UNMODERN cars? If they do, i havent seen any lately, yet HO scale is always booming. Let me tell you its not because young people want the old outdated looking rolling stock. If HO manufacturers made stuff like that in on a large scale like Lionel does, model railroading wouldnt be near the fun for people in HO scale. People wanna model what they know, what than can see and imitate it. Thats what its all about. Just because we dont live in the 40's anymore, doesn't mean we have to make toys like we still live in the 40's it does not make sense. 

Basically, Lionel needs to update with the times and move on from the old classic american flyer stuff. 

Its like a perceptual clock......hows it gonna work if no one sets it in motion. Its not. Modernized rolling stock will prove itself if Lionel would try it.....but i guess those zombie cars and other rolling stock thats O with s trucks is what they think will sell. What a shame. They are sooooo lost.

 

 

Last edited by snowmanw900

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×