Skip to main content

Hi Everyone,

The Lionel 2046  Hudson engine is from 1950-51 and 1953.  I acquired this a number of years ago off of the Bay, and never ran it until today.  I have been slowing servicing/repairing vintage engines over the last few years, the 2046 was a challenge because neither the Greenberg repair manual or the HSL Disks had a picture of the Loco, so I actually bought a second one so that I could see what goes where when reassembling it.  That was helpful, because this 2046 looked like it had been put together with  several screws that were not correct.  With the help of Jeff from the Train Tender, I was able the get the parts I needed to get this up an running.  

I always marvel on the workmanship of these vintage pieces and an always get a sense of accomplishment and joy to get them running again.  

This 2046 had the die-cast trailing truck, which is a nice detail feature. I understand that plastic was used on the 1953 version. 

20170730_125841

You can see the 4-6-4 wheel configuration.  Lots of nice details, including the wire hand rails.

20170730_125916

This is the front boiler.  It comes off with a screw on the top. 

20170730_125947

Closer detail on the wheels below.

20170730_130009

Really nice detail on the side rods.  I don't have a before and after picture, but they really cleaned up nicely using a Dremel and soft wire brush attachment. 

20170730_130022

 

  All the best, Dave

Attachments

Images (5)
  • 20170730_125841
  • 20170730_125916
  • 20170730_125947
  • 20170730_130009
  • 20170730_130022
Videos (1)
20170730_125618
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Enjoyed seeing and watching yours, Dave.  They really are cool trains.

Aunts and uncles gave my brother, who is 11 years older than me, a 2046 set for Christmas, when he was a wee boy. It got handed down to me, as no one else wanted the set. Their loss. It is an earlier 3-window version.

I do enjoy modern technology,  but I really love this rugged piece of Americana. I proudly run this 66 year old "toy" for folks, as much as my new ones.

My brother, who was mostly into pre-war Marx, had a really nice 2046 that we would run when I visited him.  I inherited that engine, along with a couple of other Lionel PW engines, when he passed (his extensive Marx collection went to his kids).  Ran it for a while, but it and the other engines have been in storage for the last few years.  I bought several early TMCC command boards that work with AC engines but never got around to installing them.   Need to find these engines and run them again.

One of many great PW engines Lionel put out.   The 2046, along with other PW engines and rolling stock will forever have a special place in O gauge that can never be replaced.  Even with the modern motive power I have, and new electronics, command, etc., my PW Lionel has the memories of my dad and I running them together for years.  Now, they are all in my care and shall forever remain, running as they always have and right beside all the other engines I own.

Jesse   TCA   12-68275

Hi Guys,  thanks so much for your kind comments!   I feel fortunate to have a hobby that allows so many ways to enjoy.   While I enjoy the new stuff,  its the MPC/post war era equipment that I feel capable enough to repair and restore and if I can't figure it out, the OGR Forum is the perfect place for answers.

 

I bought a nice one a few years ago. When I was a wee lad, my dad bought me a 2365 C&O GP7 set. It's the very stripped down Geep, no horn, plastic couplers, no fuel tank.  The neighbor kid had a 646 (the O version of the 2046). We did a tug of war and I lost big, the 646 walked away and left my geep spinning its wheels. 

So I might restage the battle on my own layout - I bought a 2365 recently and 'hotrodded it', adding the fuel tank, but loaded with lead shot, and changed out the plastic couplers for operating ones. It pulls much better now. Who will win in this contest.

2046 is a great looking, fine running loco, pulls great. A very clever way to make a small NYC hudson from 736 and 2055 parts.

 

Jim

The 2046 might have been my favorite PW steamers as a kid. Never had one until a few years ago though. 

Dave, I am having a hard time seeing the detail in your pics but could the main rods be on backwards? They appear to have little or no detail. Maybe its just the lighting. They should have raised edges like the side rods and eccentric rod.

When I restored mine I also had to buy some new valve gear. I noticed the repro gear is now nickel plated vs tin. (Note the color difference from the side rods). A brush plating kit from Caswell fixed that.

Before:

After:

hudsons [1)

BTW 5340 is from a kit that Charles Ro made for the 2046. I consists of a new shell and 2426 tender. Not sure when it was first offered though as I am not the original purchaser.

Pete

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • hudsons (1)
Last edited by Norton
eddie g posted:

You should glue the jewels back in the marker lights. Other than that, it looks very nice. I have had a lot of these over the years. Nice engine.  Nice layout too.

Hi Eddie,

Great catch about the jewels!  I just ordered several parts from the Train Tender and included the jewels, I elected to go with the 24 count package with the bulk rate of 15 cents a piece.

Hope you are doing well!  Dave

Norton posted:

The 2046 might have been my favorite PW steamers as a kid. Never had one until a few years ago though. 

Dave, I am having a hard time seeing the detail in your pics but could the main rods be on backwards? They appear to have little or no detail. Maybe its just the lighting. They should have raised edges like the side rods and eccentric rod.

When I restored mine I also had to buy some new valve gear. I noticed the repro gear is now nickel plated vs tin. (Note the color difference from the side rods). A brush plating kit from Caswell fixed that.

Before:

After:

hudsons [1)

BTW 5340 is from a kit that Charles Ro made for the 2046. I consists of a new shell and 2426 tender. Not sure when it was first offered though as I am not the original purchaser.

Pete

 

Hi Pete, thanks for the tip on the plating kit.  I may need to try that.  I had to look up which rods were the main rods to answer your question lol.  The detail was just washed out, so the plating kit may be the trick to get them looking like the other rods.  

Really appreciate everyone's comments.  This hobby provides a nice respite from work and other life challenges.

All the best, Dave

Norton posted:

When I restored mine I also had to buy some new valve gear. I noticed the repro gear is now nickel plated vs tin. (Note the color difference from the side rods).  

In the early post war era Lionel went to cadmium plating. When it corrodes it gets a yellow or greenish look to it. Cadmium is so toxic that it is rarely used for plating anymore. It was a superior plating for nuts and bolts because of its anti seize and lubricating properties. But no more. The other common platings were/are nickel and zinc. 

I wasn't aware Lionel used cadmium but knew about the use of nickel. Besides the tin plating kit I also have nickel, brass, and copper. You only have to buy one kit. For other metals you just have to get the plating solution and applicating wand.

Caswell has something called Copy Cad which is supposed to be close to cadmium in color but non toxic.

The fasteners on my Norton were cadmium plated. Never ate one but I suspect I was exposed many times. 

Pete

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×