Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I would expect most items fall into one of the following when going beyond ERR additions:

  • The original piece is too nice/collectible/sentimental to molest
  • The piece is too far gone to warrant "upgrading"
  • The costs/logistics are too high compared to later releases that have command control and can motors
  • The result is more of a kit-bash than an "upgrade"

 

That is not to say it hasn't ever been done, but it isn't very common from my perspective.

I did my 2037 with a AC Commander. The board had to live in the tender and I made a universal railsounds boxcar that goes behind it. I put the reed switch on the tender and ran a one wire tether out the back.

On my J, it was the Warhorse with the pullmore. I sent the motor to Timko for the can conversion and used a Cruise commander inside the shell to control it. I used the factory tether and railsounds in the tender. I used the stock puffer smoke unit as well. 

Both run great but will not creep like a modern command controlled locomotive. I enjoy running the J now as I can’t stand the growl that it had with the pullmore and the inconsistency in the speed. I don’t have much real estate for running so the noise is a no go for me. The 2037 runs well but doesn’t see much run time. It has never ran as well as it has since I converted it to command control.

The 2037 was the first locomotive that my parents gave me and I no longer use conventional control so I had to adapt it if I wanted to run it. 

Last edited by SPFord27

I've got a million to-do's on my train to-do list, but only one involves any upgrades to the 7 PW engines I inherited from my grandfather. My mom bought him an O27 General in 1960 and it's never good a good runner/puller. It consumes a lot of oil and just never had any guts. Despite being over-sized and my only 19th century set running among all 1900-1960 era items, it's a fan favorite. My grandpa's other items all still run as well as when I remember them as a kid, so I won't touch them, but I almost feel like I'd be doing grandpa and mom a solid by upgrading the General.

If you can get the parts...you can still buy the diecast shell turbine style tenders with rs2.5...if you can get a chip set used in the tmcc turbine you can put those chips in the tender and have a diecast tender to pull behind any turbine and have turbine sound.

I put a modified lionel fan smoker in a turbine with a tender set up like this...will smoke you out while whining away...

Last edited by gibson man
bmoran4 posted:

I would expect most items fall into one of the following when going beyond ERR additions:

  • The original piece is too nice/collectible/sentimental to molest
  • The piece is too far gone to warrant "upgrading"
  • The costs/logistics are too high compared to later releases that have command control and can motors
  • The result is more of a kit-bash than an "upgrade"

 

That is not to say it hasn't ever been done, but it isn't very common from my perspective.

No - more to it than that. The above has kind of a "not worth it/worthy" sentiment.

I have known of several done, and done well, on average-to-nice PW equipment. "Very common" - no; but not hyper-rare. I have considered it on my first loco, a 2055 Hudson from 1955, but first it would need to be completely refurbished after a squillion miles of use, then upgraded to ERR. Just for grins. May yet.

I have heard of a Pre-War Std Gauge steamer upgraded to command - talk about a unicorn.

As much as anything else that keeps PW out of the ERR, etc., column, it's the people that tend to own this stuff. This is not a group that leans toward such things. Not on their To Do lists. (Now, I know there are exceptions.)

If, for example, your PW 773 Hudson, or other 700E/700E clone, means a lot to you - and it should - a "new Chinese one with a can motor" isn't going to replace it. If you want it to swim with the new stuff, upgraded it should be. It's not even a destructive process.  

D500 posted:
bmoran4 posted:

I would expect most items fall into one of the following when going beyond ERR additions:

  • The original piece is too nice/collectible/sentimental to molest
  • The piece is too far gone to warrant "upgrading"
  • The costs/logistics are too high compared to later releases that have command control and can motors
  • The result is more of a kit-bash than an "upgrade"

 

That is not to say it hasn't ever been done, but it isn't very common from my perspective.

No - more to it than that. The above has kind of a "not worth it/worthy" sentiment.

I have known of several done, and done well, on average-to-nice PW equipment. "Very common" - no; but not hyper-rare. I have considered it on my first loco, a 2055 Hudson from 1955, but first it would need to be completely refurbished after a squillion miles of use, then upgraded to ERR. Just for grins. May yet.

I have heard of a Pre-War Std Gauge steamer upgraded to command - talk about a unicorn.

As much as anything else that keeps PW out of the ERR, etc., column, it's the people that tend to own this stuff. This is not a group that leans toward such things. Not on their To Do lists. (Now, I know there are exceptions.)

If, for example, your PW 773 Hudson, or other 700E/700E clone, means a lot to you - and it should - a "new Chinese one with a can motor" isn't going to replace it. If you want it to swim with the new stuff, upgraded it should be. It's not even a destructive process.  

@D500, my comments were with regards to the posters initial query which was upgrading PW with command control AND can motors AND more. There are plenty of examples that do a fraction of that, such as just ERR, or a liquid/fan smoke unit and such, but very few go full out.

I made new handrails on the tinplate I did out of nickel wire so I could solder it.  I insulated them with clear heatshrink where they went through the shell.  I joined all the handrails inside into a common antenna.

FWIW, I've floated a ton of diecast and brass tender shells, I've never had a big issue getting it done.  One key item is to use the proper tape, I use Kapton tape, it's very thin and doesn't require a lot of grinding and filing to fit over it.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×