Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The '48 train never operated with steam....not even a second section.  IIRC, the train was ordered with electro-pneumatic brakes, at least on some cars.  Seems this was incompatible with Diesel power, let alone steam.  Now all that being said, there are rumors that many trains operated with steam on rare occasions during the winter of '49, due to extreme cold, which would normally never see steam.  Interesting, but never seen any real proof.....possible urban legend, like the PRR T1 commuter trains to Derry.

Steam was used on premier passenger trains for a few years after WWII during severe winter weather. The reason was that a two unit set of "E" units did not have the steam generator/water capacity to keep the train adequately heated. (Some of the later deliveries of "E" units to the NYC were equipped with two steam generators to rectify the heating problem.) There were a few NYC trains that were regularly assigned an "A-B-A" combination of diesels, including the 20TC Century Limited and the Commodore Vanderbilt, and one conclusion is that these two trains never saw steam, at least for heating the train. The Century had "first call" on motive power so it was probable that no steam was ever used on this train after the war. "Never" is probably too strong a word though....as "things happen".....

I do not know if 2nd sections were commonly run, but steam was certainly more likely on a 2nd section due to motive power cycling which was established to attain high diesel monthly mileage.

Bottom line...the jury is still out.....

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×