Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I prefer chip dip to sheep dip... I think

  As a non-proto paint job I can see the appeal, I'm just not "feeling it" for my trains, but that is personal; go for it. I'd do it on a helmet, gas tank, hood, etc.    I might rather have this done than buy a sports team, or superhero, or "insert marketing brand here" graphics job on a train. (I'm a sucker for a good logo or billboard though; tough call)

  I did do reading on this all a while back while researching liquid metal & magnetism for construction of objects.  Better print oriented alignment and detail using magnetism on pigments has been progressing fast. Automated dips are used vs the hand dip too.  This may be the future for a lot of better mfg printing being done on irregular shapes. And you can also bet it is being researched deeply as it stands to be a more cost effective, EPA friendly,  and overall more versitile print tool. (Imagine magnetism recollecting and sorting pigments for the next dip. Good pigment isn't cheap) I'm also curious about the possibility of layering results using and altering the specific gravity of the liquids; to lay specific overlapping half tone layers, etc.. in one dip.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×