Just a thought here. I find it so odd when talking with those who like to research and invest in stocks that anytime I suggest railroads they look at me like I'm nuts. They can't seem to get out of the trendy mindset and only focus on the Facebooks, Banks, tech. But if you look back to 1980...railroad stocks are about the only ones that have steadily grown...one would be wealthy. Its amazing that the public still sees railroads as either not used or a dying industry. When they are anything but that.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I can only say look at the performance of Union Pacific (UNP), Norfolk Southern (NSC) and to a lesser extent Kansas City Southern (KSU) over the past 2 years. They aren't flashy or go up huge amounts overnight but are steady, decent performers. UNP split during that period. They pay dividends as well.
I sold off some unused trains about 2 years ago and after doing a lot of research decided I was going to use the money to buy...trains! Those 3 had the best fundamentals at the time. I only wish I could have bought more!
. . . steady, decent performers. . . . . They pay dividends as well.
I watch myself against letting my personal enthusiasm for any industry or company color my investments, but I have about 8% or something like that in RRs. As you say they are steady performers - and they should be their business in linked to the general economy pretty directly. Most are well run. And I love dividends - good income with up to now) a lower income tax designation.
I can only say look at the performance of Union Pacific (UNP), Norfolk Southern (NSC) and to a lesser extent Kansas City Southern (KSU) over the past 2 years. They aren't flashy or go up huge amounts overnight but are steady, decent performers. UNP split during that period. They pay dividends as well.
I sold off some unused trains about 2 years ago and after doing a lot of research decided I was going to use the money to buy...trains! Those 3 had the best fundamentals at the time. I only wish I could have bought more!
I remembered that people would buy enough stocks so they would have enough o live off the dividends. That means if a company was producing dividends, it was healthy. None of this owning stocks because of a stocks worth. Today, the Stock Market would be worth NOTHING if that older standard was in use.
I puchased some Union Pacific stock just over two years ago. If has performed very well, up 76% (but most stocks have performed well the last 4-5 years). Also has a small dividend (1.8%).
RR stocks are not a big % of my portfolio. I like to diversify in numerous industries ( tech, consumer goods, REIT's, oil, pharm, transportation, healthcare, communications, etc)
You have to keep in mind that in general, investors, and most people, are short-sighted. Everyone is out for that Big Score. They want to get rich right now, or go broke trying.
Never had the money to invest in stocks and the way the stock market is stacked against the small investor I'm not sorry I never did invest in stocks.