Skip to main content

Hi,

Please, I would like to know if Weaver Models' B&O Wagon Top box cars are of a true 1:48 scale size proportion?

I have one each, of the C-16 models and they, as well, as the other wagon tops, are beautifully crafted, colored and detailed.

But the width seems narrower, than other 1:48 scale size cars that I have.

I thank you in advance,

RJL

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Weaver wagon top box and express cars are indeed correct for 1:48 scale.

They were made using original B&O engineering drawings for them.

 

And yes, these cars are somewhat narrower than 10' wide overall, which most other freight cars are. They were 9' 9 5/8" wide over their sideposts with a 9' 2" clear inside width. The wagontop box cars also stood 14' 5 7/8" high, rail to running board.

 

The slightly narrower width and rounded eaves on thse cars with their 10' interior height was purposefully done to maximize their cubic capacity and also assure their fit through B&O's old 1840s era tunnels. 

 

B&O had to watch incoming cars from other roads carefully and route them to assure they would not run into a problem with clearances in the older tunnels. The railroad produced a clearance booklet which descibed the maximum dimensions for cars permitted on each line and branch track.

 

Box cars having a 10' 6" interior height had to be re-routed to avoid the older tunnels until the mid to late 1950s. That's when some older tuinnels were 'daylighted" by removing their overburden, or their roadbeds sunk to lower them and gain clerance for taller cars. 1840s tunnels were also rather narrow. So double tracked tunnels became single track until another track could be built around the tunnel, or a second tunnel dug for a second track.

 

Also to note; mill gondolas of 65' in length were also narrower in overall extreme

width at about 9' or so. This was to assure their clearance on relatively tight curves and in the close confines of industrial trackage.

 

So in true 1:48 scale, not all modeled cars would be of equal width. Neither were their prototypes!

 

Mr. Ed Bommer,

I thank you for your considerate reply, with great information.

I enjoy reading of your experiences and knowledge, regarding all aspects of railroading, actual and modeling.

Now, that I'm retired and more involved in model railroading, I'm finding and learning more of real life railroading, which is interesting.

I did not realize that area and space, for clearances for curves, land formation and tunnels, especially tunnels of different heights and widths, affected railroading, until being involved with model railroading.

Respectfully and Sincerely,

Ralph 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×