Skip to main content

This used to be my favorite electric loco. Very disappointed. I am on a list at MTH for a replacement shell. Yes, MTH has promised myself and others that they will make this right by replacing these shells when they rerun this model. I have been on this list for over a year and a half.  I keep hoping the next catalog has these in it so I can get this fixed. I hope MTH's strategy is to simply never rerun this loco. I still have faith they will make it right in the end. I just hope I am still alive to see it. 

Attachments

Images (12)
  • 100_4527
  • 100_4528
  • 100_4529
  • 100_4530
  • 100_4531
  • 100_4532
  • 100_4533
  • 100_4534
  • 100_4535
  • 100_4537
  • 100_4538
  • 100_4539
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hate to bust any bubbles, but locomotive shells aren't the only victims of poor quality control in the Far East casting facilities; my Lionel I-12 cabeese had several truck castings disintegrate in the past.

Even more disturbing are several MTH plastic diesel shells that seem to become brittle with time-attaching posts that attach the shell to the frame disintegrate and need unscheduled post repairs.

bob3 posted:

Ouch- that is too bad - but this is the downside of building models out of low cost metals, rather than brass or plastic

 

There is nothing wrong with zinc. It is used all over the world for thousands of things, some critical, that have nothing to do with models. That the impurities (commonly lead, as I understand) are real and damaging is undeniable, but what do you think those hundreds of thousands (millions?) of Post-War Lionel steamer shells were made from? Not brass and not plastic, and a more stable bunch of zinc castings I can't imagine.

Lionel had the problem with some Pre-War zinc castings (notably in some of the scale 700E pieces), but the problem was solved so long as the production was domestic; American Flyer also suffered from it (and badly warping plastics) both Pre- and Pot-War, I believe.

I don't care for zinc because I modify things, and I find it an annoying metal to work. But that's my problem. The pest problem has affected me also, so far not in the crumbling locomotive sense, but I imagine that a few of those on my shelves are quietly self-destructing. I have few locos in the box.

Also, while I have numerous MTH locos, partly because I run TMCC and not DCS, I may not have the MTH inventory that some do. I sense a bit more of it with that brand (not an MTH bash).

All brands have been affected, as we all know. And none of this helps the guy with the crumbling loco, as above. It's just a terrible sight to see a nice loco - I love it - do that.
   

That really sucks. 

On a prototype sidebar: prior to retirement, it's been reported that P5's had cracking main driver frames.  Pennsy would paint them heavily with black paint to "fill" the cracks to hide them from FRA inspectors.  So, in the twilight of their careers, they always seemed to have freshly painted underframes and severely weathered bodies.

Unfortunately, the P5 zinc pest thing is more like art imitating life.

Fred

PRRronbh posted:

This is what happens when there is no true/actual Quality ASSURANCE.  Quality Control is no substitute.  Two different animals.

Not of they do thier jobs. Assurance is just a preventative offshoot of failures of QC. I.e. identified management of Q.C. labor. The fault can actually like elsewhere; it identifies where an ax may fall if labor is the continual issue.

Zinc rot is a problem in Chinese model manufacturing primarily because the central production facilities rely so heavily on subcontractors for parts production.

In China, some of these subcontractors are described as garage operations, meaning they are small shops or one-man operations. Unfortunately, too many of them practice poor quality control, especially when it comes to casting zinc parts properly.

Usually, the bad parts are couplers, truck sideframes or freight car frames. Locomotive shells aren’t usually victimized. But, as is the case in this thread, not always.

The problem is that train production is considered a low-volume endeavor in China, so the use of subcontractors is inevitable. Since there is no way to inspect a part for improper zinc processing immediately after it has been cast, the problem really can’t be fixed by quality control inspections at the factory. The subcontractors have to take responsibility beforehand.

Fortunately, as D500 alluded to above, the problem is very uncommon. And I think it is laughable to call zinc a cheap metal, especially given how properly casted zinc products have outlasted most forms of alternative metals.

As for plastic, manufacturers turned to its use in the postwar era because it was cheaper to use for castings. Drop your 15-pound locomotive to the concrete floor from four feet high and tell me how superior it is.

Scott: I have sent three emails to MTH thru the web site and have yet to get a response. Kristen was the lady that helped me last time and it a shame she is gone. Does anyone have any contact information at MTH on this issue. Eric from another Zinc Pest thread with the same P5a was having the issue and MTH reached out to him directly to resolve his issue and I was hoping that I could get the same service.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×