Originally Posted by Tommy:
Your video documents how an operable steam engine requiring a minor overhaul, ended up in pieces around a shop after ten years and spending more money that was required to rebuild 611 or build the British Tornado.
It is quite clear that there is incompetence involved. a lack of engineering acumen beyond belief.
Taxpayer funds were used, both state and federal,
I believe a criminal investigation is warranted and a detailed account of who was paid for what and when should be examined in detail.
I can see why people were upset.
Your video is grounds enough to substantiate a criminal investigation and potential indictment of members of the non-profit and prison sentences.
Tommy,
It's not so much that I was arguing against the amount that has been spent. What alot of people don't understand is that the #14 was in HORRIBLE shape before the restoration began. She spent 30 years in an amusement park that literally beat her death on heavy grades for decades and kept her together with TIG weld and bailing wire.
By the time the restoration actually started the only thing holding her together was force of habit. This engine is the physical version of "jack up the whistle and build a new engine underneath". Considering that we're talking about a piece by piece bottom to top rebuilding of a 90 ton engine, the money spent to get it done is not that far off.
My problem is that for the amount of money spent it should be further along than it is and the historical society that runs things down there basically has the response of leave us alone whenever this fact comes up. When your talking about close to 1 million in public funding and that's your response, it doesn't look good from the outside.
Does it need to go so far as a criminal investigation? I personally don't think it needs to go that far but it definately needs a third party audit at this point to make absolutely sure that the worst case scenario is that they were just inept with the funds as opposed to anything actually worse.
I think some people took my video as an attempt to discredit the contractor currently working on the project. If they'd actually read the full text of the video it states that most of the fault lies in the actions of the historical society. The contractor is not the problem in this situation, they just have a crappy client. But I guess some people wanted to take it that way and had me pull everything.
One simple action that would gain back alot of lost credit amongst people that dedicated personal time, labor, and money to the project (including me) would be just a simple straight forward explanation of just whats going on down there. But if somebody ever brings up why everything's stopped again you either get silence or told to leave them alone, and by that I mean the historical society. I personally don't see how explaining yourself as an organization, what happened, and just being honest about whats going on (even if it's not great) is worse than people having to conjecture about just what you did with a truckload of public funding. They'll eventually start thinking the worst of you as Tommy has done above here and by their actions you can't blame that.