Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Of course, being steamers, this would be "double-heading" (not "MU'ing, a non-steam term/ability)

Now, the "tender-to-tender" hook-up is rare, but not unknown.

Would it be "double-rearing" in this case? Hm.

I've also seen a photo of a NYC pusher (rare itself) in steam days on the rear of the train running tender-first.

AGHRMatt posted:

Tie ups and Lash Ups,

Are done with shoe laces

MU's and Consists

Take trains to far places.

Knowing the difference

Makes all of us sing...

These are a few of my favorite things.

 

By the way, nice video.

Nice poem Matt!

(In this case I was referring to the dcs control system term.  Even though I have real world RR experience, sometimes it's just fun to see what type of response you get)

D500 posted:

Now, the "tender-to-tender" hook-up is rare, but not unknown.

Would it be "double-rearing" in this case? Hm.

I only have the one command steamer that has functioning couplers on both ends.  I was thinking that in the real world if I had to run around a train to pull in the opposite direction why wouldn't I want the engine that was at the rear of the loco consist to now be facing forward?  I have never seen it done this way in pictures, but why not?

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×