Skip to main content

Okay Train Gods, this one is a little weird I must admit so I want to share.  A little long but lots of details.

Today I decided to upgrade my 3 CAB2s to 1.74.  Easy enough, I've done the upgrades before.  I have a WiFi connect to my Legacy Base.  Plugged in the Black Module and fired up the Legacy System Utility.  I decided to do a Legacy Base Backup first as it has been a while since I did one.  After proceeding VERY slow, I got the message "Communication Error - No response from base".  Options on LSU allow a slower connection if you have trouble but that's only on a wired connection.  I then just went to creating the CAB module and I ended up with the same "Communication Error".  Important to note that the Communication Error was after a little bit of slow progress at varying percentages of completeness; never beyond 20%.  I was stumped.

I happen to have the luxury of a test bench with another Base and CAB2 so I decided to give that a try.  Also Wifi connection and I was able to create the 1.74 Black Module for upgrading my CAB2s.  All the CAB2s upgraded successfully which was my original intent.  However...why wasn't my primary Base able to work with LSU to do a Backup and Module creation?  Was it WiFi module?  Was it Base?  Long story short, I swapped out both into my test environment and everything was fine.  LSU completed both tasks rapidly with each WiFi and each Base in the Test environment.  I went back to my primary layout and neither Base would work with LSU.

Has anyone seen anything remotely close to this situation?  I currently have 17 LCS components on my primary layout with a Maximum draw of 1420 ma.  I have 2(two) 2-amp power supplies driving the PDI runs so I've got plenty of power; I will have more components later.  My Test environment is simple with 3 modules; Wifi, SER2, and CSM2

While I've got my CAB2s upgraded, I'm still concerned there is something else at play.  Anyone have any ideas?

Last edited by LionelAG
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Did you swap the test bench Legacy base into the layout?  That will tell you if it's the Legacy base or something else in the environment.  I use the Legacy system on my layout through the WiFi to create modules, it's never been an issue here.

Yes, I swapped the test bench Legacy base into the layout.  It failed there too.  Something in the layout...

GRJ-

So I traced down the offending components that I recently added to the LCS string; 2 ASC2's.  Everything was fine until those were encountered.  An interesting item though is that my WiFi unit is not the module in the string.  In fact its about 7th or 8th place.  If the WiFi unit was in the first spot, this wouldn't have even appeared.  So I guess I found an interesting was to test connectivity along the full LCS string (for Legacy Base2+WiFi module) by placing the WiFi module further downstream from the Base2.

I'll give Lionel support a buzz tomorrow to discuss my alternatives.

Thanks for listening as usual!

Tim

@LionelAG posted:

GRJ-

So I traced down the offending components that I recently added to the LCS string; 2 ASC2's.  Everything was fine until those were encountered.  An interesting item though is that my WiFi unit is not the module in the string.  In fact its about 7th or 8th place.  If the WiFi unit was in the first spot, this wouldn't have even appeared.  So I guess I found an interesting was to test connectivity along the full LCS string (for Legacy Base2+WiFi module) by placing the WiFi module further downstream from the Base2.

I'll give Lionel support a buzz tomorrow to discuss my alternatives.

Thanks for listening as usual!

Tim

I seem to recall that the WiFi module should be first in the string, don't recall exactly where that's written...

I seem to recall that the WiFi module should be first in the string, don't recall exactly where that's written...

GRJ is correct.  Here's a quote out of the WiFi module manual, bottom of Page 4...

"It is recommended that the LCS WiFi module occupy the first connection in the LCS chain of LCS products."

Up until now the "recommended" word seemed a bit optional but in my case ended up being critical.  Shared learnings...

It was a wiring convenience for me not to have WiFi as the #1 module but I can certainly refactor to honor this requirement.

I think the answer is on p15 of the manual. At idle the the WiFi module draws 30ma, but when operating it draws up to 300ma, by far the largest current draw of any LCS device. Installing the WiFi as the first device minimizes the voltage drop along the LCS PDI interconnecting cables. Adding two more ASC-2's with their interconnecting PDI cables between the Base and the WiFi could have caused enough voltage drop to compromise the signal. Voltage drop (and current supply) is why my LCS string of devices needs five powered Joiners to operate reliably.

ASC2's draw 50ma each.

Last edited by AmFlyer
@AmFlyer posted:

I think the answer is on p15 of the manual. At idle the the WiFi module draws 30ma, but when operating it draws up to 300ma, by far the largest current draw of any LCS device. Installing the WiFi as the first device minimizes the voltage drop along the LCS PDI interconnecting cables. Adding two more ASC-2's with their interconnecting PDI cables between the Base and the WiFi could have caused enough voltage drop to compromise the signal. Voltage drop (and current supply) is why my LCS string of devices needs five powered Joiners to operate reliably.

ASC2's draw 50ma each.

As stated, I'm driving my LCS string with 2(two) 2-amp power supplies and my total consumption at the sum of all amperage for my string is just below 2 amps.  Power is NOT is problem in this case.

What my post above says it is possible that the issue with the WiFi device could be caused by excessive voltage drop in the PDI cables. I did not say that inadequate current capabilities of the power supplies was an issue. The LCS devices are designed for 12V, below 10V they can begin to show some intermittent issues. Below 8V they do not function as designed. My WiFi is the first device on the string, connected to the Base 2 with a 10' PDI cable, After 40' of PDI cable the voltage was under 8V with the device load we had on the PDI string. This was as analyzed in early 2016 by the Lionel R&D team with their system development computer program. They sent us three prototype powered Joiners and told us where to install them in the PDI string. The Joiners reset the voltage to 12V at their output and provide an additional 2A capability. We have since added a lot more BPC2's to the LCS system so there are now 5 powered Joiners along the PDI cable string. We only need 4A total current but the voltage drop was enough that it took another Joiner every 40' to keep the voltage above 10V at the input to every device for the system to work reliably. The more LCS devices connected the worse the voltage drop becomes. Just saying it is worth looking at after all the other possibilities are eliminated.

@LionelAG posted:

One last interesting note, I have 3 ASC2's earlier in the string before the wifi module that caused no problem and then recently added 2 more ASC2's, again ahead of the wifi module.  Only the 2 new ASC2's caused problems.  Something is different about the newer ASC2 but I'm done studying the differences at this point.

I'd expect it's just the latency of the additional units in the string rather than a difference.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×