Originally Posted by pmilazzo:
I'm still waiting for numbered turnouts, some subset of 4, 5, 6, 7, something. That's whats really missing to the line at this point. Combining Command Control with Remote is fantastic idea, but I bet it will cost the same or more than the Command Control turnouts they have now.
{emphasis mine}
{edit: Paul responded while I was typing, so I see he did think the same thing I did, but others seem to question the cost factor as well - we will have to see when the price sheet actually comes out }
Maybe I didn't clearly suggest what I was trying to. The current (like since they were introduced) Command Capable switches have always been able to be remotely controlled as the original remote control versions. They come with the controller and can be used either way.
I wasn't suggesting the new switches would cost more than the current Command Controlled versions, just that they would likely cost more than the standard Remote Control (no TMCC) switches.
Unless there was some revolutionary advancement in the technology or manufacturing methods, I can't see how they would be lower than a current Remote Control (no TMCC) switch.
After all, costs frequently go up for identical prioducts pretty much a little in each successive catalog. It's hard to believe something improved will go for less (though it's possible - I am sure some examples such as the Milwaukee Road Steamer that was quitre a good deal a few years back could be cited).
As to simpler improvements, it would be nice if they could include a template for the controllers with numbers higher than 6 at some point! That should be a very simple improvement to implement - no tooling required!
-Dave