Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I don't like the way it sounds at higher speeds but when running it slow and even medium speeds I think it sounds great.
 
I am getting more into brass and really like the 4 chuffs per rev. 3rd rail uses TMCC rs4 in their engines so I can still use my remote without any problems.
 
LOL I am still getting a new J. I want it so I am going to get it lol. 
 
Originally Posted by Patrick H:

Looks like you just saved yourself some money for and upgraded J. I changed mine back to 2 chuff per , Didnt  sound right at speed. What do you think?

 

Nice job!  I did a similar upgrade to my N&W 611, but I did it by building up the lobes on the cam with JB Weld.  I'm working on my NKP 779 now, but the 611 is a much easier engine to take apart, etc...

 

Here's a quick video of my finished product.  The difficulty is trying to get it in time...takes a lot of sanding and rebuilding of the lobes to get it close/right.  Mine isn't perfect, but it's close enough for me.  Hope you guys don't mind me jumping in on this one. 

 

 

Originally Posted by J Daddy:
Wow great job.  They should offer a kit to upgrade.


They do!  Just get some JB Weld and a Dremel and you have the kit.  Easy upgrade but can be a little time consuming.  The other thing one could do would be to buy the 612 undercarriage/frame when the parts are available...or a legacy frame for a Berk in my case of the NKP 779. 

I would recommend just using a reed switch. It is much easier to change back if you don't like it or want to sell the engine.
 
 
Originally Posted by Larry Mullen:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
Wow great job.  They should offer a kit to upgrade.


They do!  Just get some JB Weld and a Dremel and you have the kit.  Easy upgrade but can be a little time consuming.  The other thing one could do would be to buy the 612 undercarriage/frame when the parts are available...or a legacy frame for a Berk in my case of the NKP 779. 

 

I would agree, but since I have no plans of selling, this worked for me.  Plus, I had heard others not happy with the sound of the reed switch method.  The only reason I would want to do it is if it sounds correct.
 
 
Originally Posted by n&wsteamfan:
I would recommend just using a reed switch. It is much easier to change back if you don't like it or want to sell the engine.
 
 
Originally Posted by Larry Mullen:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
Wow great job.  They should offer a kit to upgrade.


They do!  Just get some JB Weld and a Dremel and you have the kit.  Easy upgrade but can be a little time consuming.  The other thing one could do would be to buy the 612 undercarriage/frame when the parts are available...or a legacy frame for a Berk in my case of the NKP 779. 

 

 

Originally Posted by Larry Mullen:
I would agree, but since I have no plans of selling, this worked for me.  Plus, I had heard others not happy with the sound of the reed switch method.  The only reason I would want to do it is if it sounds correct.

I'm confused, why would the reed switch triggering chuffs sound any different than a cam activating a microswitch?

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:
Originally Posted by Larry Mullen:
I would agree, but since I have no plans of selling, this worked for me.  Plus, I had heard others not happy with the sound of the reed switch method.  The only reason I would want to do it is if it sounds correct.

I'm confused, why would the reed switch triggering chuffs sound any different than a cam activating a microswitch?

If you don't have the magnets at a perfect 1/4 distance on the drive wheels, or half distance apart using the tender wheels, ( I believe Alex mentioned this as the most difficult part) the timing of the  chuffs can vary, a bit closer and a bit farther. Nothing against Aaron, bit if you listen closely to the video in the first post, the chuffs are more like 1,2....3...4, 1,2...3...4. Its still an improvement, and I'm not saying I could do any better, nor have I tried.

Last edited by RickO
Originally Posted by RickO:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Well, if you do it with the cam lobes, if you don't make them perfectly, you'll have the same issue.

True, I'm not sure exactly what Larry was referring to, however it sounds like he spent a ton of time on his "lobes".

I shouldn't have used the word "sound."  I should have said the timing.  Several of the guys I talked to said, for whatever reason, it was hard to quarter (I hope that is the correct term) the magnets.  This obviously affects the timing.  If I would want to set mine back to 2-chuffs, 30 seconds with the dremel and it's done.  

 

Yes, I spent a good bit of time on mine; it's not perfect either, but I think it's pretty close.  

 

With the reed switch method...does that activate the smoke unit as well?  I'm not a tech nor do I pretend to be.  Just trying to find out an answer.

 

Thanks.

The reed switch would activate whatever the microswitch you're replacing with the reed switch.  I know that for my Cruise Commander conversion the reed switch will also control the smoke unit fan to have synchronized chuffing.

 

I agree if you don't get the timing right, it would sound wrong.  That applies to any mechanical method of generating the switch closures.  That's one reason I'm thinking of using flywheel revs to trigger it, turns out I get exactly 24 revs for one turn of the drivers, which conveniently divides into 4 chuffs exactly.

Hi John,

 I've been reading what you guys are talking about, I just went down to my shop and tried what you said. If I spin the flywheel 24 times it divides into 4 chuffs, but if you mount one magnet to the flywheel isn't it going to pass the reed switch 24 times. I think that would make 24 chuffs per rev. Please tell me what I'm missing, because it's driving me crazy. LOL

 

ALEX

606?  I'm going to do my MTH GS-4 Daylight first, it originally was PS/1, and I'm installing an ERR Cruise Commander, RailSounds Commander, and doing the chuff.  I'm actually considering trying to program my Arduino that I'm going to use to do a couple of things.  I figure I should have the cab lights come on when it's stopped and go off when it moves.  Since I'd be sensing the motor running, I already have what I need to make that happen.

 

Another thing I'm thinking on is adjusting the duration of the chuffs depending on speed.  I may be able to cure some of the ills of a simple switch by adding some intelligence to the process.

 

Instead of a magnet, I may also use an encoder strip on the flywheel and a sensor to read it.  I have a couple of the MTH sensors, I'll have to see if I can figure what I need to use that with my uP.

 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×