Skip to main content

I'm currently working on a 736 for a friend of mine. It has been converted to a liquid smoke unit, but the element is burned up and rusted out. I gave him the option to get a new liquid smoke element or go back to the heater element. If he chooses the old heater element, do I need a metal lid, or is the plastic one okay to use? Thanks
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hi Michael,

 

I recently upgraded a Lionel Post War 2025 Steam Engine to liquid smoke fluid rather than trying to restore the original smoke pellet unit.  IMHO, try to convince your friend to stay with the Smoke Fluid instead of the Pellets simply because the Fluid is less expensive and it is easier to find.  Also, there are many fragrances to choose from with the liquid.  Not so much with the pellets.  It also seems to me that the Fluid produces more and better smoke than the pellets.  Whatever your friend chooses, stay with the metal cover just to be on the safe side.  Just my 2 cents, YMMV.

 

Chief Bob (Retired) 

Thanks for the help, I think  you guys cleared me up... mostly.  I have one of those kits from S and W and I did not realize the fiberglass went over the resistor.  Is there any science on where the resistor should be located relative to the reservoir and the packing there?  Per the Lionel videos on more modern units, seems like it should be slightly above the new packing piece in the reservoir.

 

quote:
I think I just solved my question by looking underneath the plastic cap.  the resistor fits into the two small brackets on it?




The plastic caps that I have seen do not have any sort of brackets. And I have seen a fair number of melted plastic caps. IMHO, it is not desirable to have the resistor in direct contact with the cap. I still have some unused conversion kits that came with instructions. I will take a look at one in a little bit.

Last edited by C W Burfle

The smoke unit conversion kits that I have came from Charlie's Trains, and date back to 1993. They came with instructions, a black cap thet DOES have brackets molded into the inside, heater, fiberglass sleeve, two pieces of heat shrink tubing (large and small), a new liner, and a new smokestack gasket. Retail was $5.00.

 

The instructions make reference to an article in Classic Toy Trains, August 1991, pages 87-89.

 

The instructions state:

"taking care that the heater element does not touch or block the air spout inside the smoke chamber."

 

I don't think the instructions are appreciably different than what Lionel has on their site. I can try to scan the instructions and post them here if you wish.

 

 

Last edited by C W Burfle

Here are scans of the instructions that came with the kits that I have.

I took a look at a couple of NOS modern era Lionel smoke units. I don't want to take them apart because I would have to unsolder the ground lead. From what I can see, the resistor is pressed down against the smoke unit liner, as far as possible from the plastic cap.
And that is how I installed the last replacement, which was in an 8206.

I think the next time I have to renew that style smoke unit, I am going to do the opposite of what is usually discussed, and put in pellet type parts, even if the engine originally came setup to use liquid smoke.

These instructions have Dr. Tinker's name on them. I guess I purchased at least one kit from him too.

Scan1

Scan2

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Scan1
  • Scan2
Last edited by C W Burfle
Originally Posted by SantaFe158:
As Rob said, there is really no advantage to converting pellet units to only fluid.  Pellet units don't burn up as easily if run dry, and will work with fluid just as well, if not better, than they do with pellets.  Fluid units always have to be kept topped off or the resistor will eventually burn up.

I'll second this, my postwar trains, especial my 736, smoke like chimneys with the original units and JT's Mega-Smoke in them

Michael R, with smoke pellet unit the element has a ground sleeve that goes thru the metal

cap and then bent over it as it is a ground just some added info as you know the one wire coming out of element goes to e-unit lug which has other wires soldered such as head light wiret etc.

 

 Have converted many to liquid for saving some money and left some original.

Martin

 

 

 

I just did the opposite the other day.

I put a NOS PW pellet element in a tmcc Berk jr.

Gotta love finding 50yr old extra parts from Gramps in the basement.

 

The fiberglass resistor sleeve gets removed by many folks.

I've read it helps keep the resistor from burning up as soon, as well as giving a smoke increase. I think its air flow is less restrictive and wicking happens faster that way. Both would keep the resistor surface a little cooler, so "I'll buy it".

  But why is it there?

  I think its there to keep the less dense packing fluff from burning to a hard char easier by direct contact with the resistor. Once charred, the wicking slows dramatically, and that would make it run hotter than the original with a sleeve and un-burnt packing.

 So hot rod it without one for performance, but leave it on for reliability would be my guess.

 

  The first time I saw a kit with the plastic cap I laughed because it hurt too much to cry. Id rather use tin foil .

 There are plastics that can handle that kind of heat, but I don't think it was used for making those caps.

 

Mixing pellets and fluid works, but from what I've seen, the pellet residue changes to a gooey gunk once fluid is added to it & that seems as if it would slow the wicking. I didn't think to heat it, to see if it would liquefy more though

 

Glad she's cookin' for you again

 "Smoke up Johnny".

(The Breakfast Club was on recently)

  




quote:
When I finally dug out all the old smoke pellet residue




 

No need to dig out the residue.

Hold the smoke unit with a pair of pliers (or something similar), and heat up the smoke pot with a hot hairdryer, or a heat gun (low setting).

The pellet residue will liquefy, and the liner will come right to with minimal effort.

 

This is a good way to get a working element out intact too. If you don't soften the pellet material, often the heater element will break when you try to remove it.

I'm looking to replace the heating element in an early version 2026. A replacement element that I found on the bay looks like the ears are too long and likely wouldn't fit in the smoke unit without modification.  It has the same number as Olsens 2026-29.  Anyone know if this will actually work in an early 2026? Can you cut the ears off of these without issue? Is there another better source for this part?

Further, I've read of guys unwinding the element a turn or two to increase smoke output. It may be needed on this loco as it runs pretty fast at a low voltage. Can anyone desribe this process in detail with a picture or two if possible. Thank you!

JDimage

Attachments

Images (1)
  • image

Lionel made two different pellet smoke units, commonly referred to as "large pot" and "small pot".
The element pictured above should have a ceramic slug on one side, and is used with the "large pot" smoke unit.

The small pot smoke units use a different heater assembly, #671-169, pictured below. (Picture taken from "The Train Tender" parts supplier web site)

The small pot heater assemblies do not have the ceramic piece.
The easiest way to tell the assembled smoke units apart is by the cover.
On the small pot units, the cover goes over (outside) the die cast smoke pot.
On the large pot units, the cover goes inside the die cast smoke pot.

Going from memory, your locomotive should have a small pot smoke unit.

Originally, the small pot units were made with different windings for 027 and 0 gauge locomotives.
In a relatively short period they standardized on one winding for both, and then redesigned the smoke unit, creating the large pot version.  The small pot units are much less robust than the large pot ones. 

Thanks to Olsens parts, you can read about smoke units here.

671-169

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 671-169
Last edited by C W Burfle

Further, I've read of guys unwinding the element a turn or two to increase smoke output. It may be needed on this loco as it runs pretty fast at a low voltage. Can anyone describe this process in detail with a picture or two if possible. Thank you!

Removing a turn to increase smoke output is discussed in the Lionel documentation, linked in my previous post.
If you decide to try this be aware:

1 - removing a winding will increase power consumption. I had at least one locomotive that would not run as fast due to excessive draw by the smoke element

2 - removing a winding will shorten the life of the element.

3 - When I was a kid, on more than one occasion I burnt out the element on early smoke units by turning the voltage up too high. Removing a winding makes this more likely to happen (see #2).

CW, thanks for the great information and links to even more. The 671-169 looks much more like the one in my 2026.  

Once I receive the new element, I will hold off on removing any winding to see how it smokes with a clean pot, new element, and smoke fluid as I don't have any more pills.  

Thanks again for taking the time to pass along your expertise. 

All the best,

JD

I have a 1953 LIONEL Berkshire that uses pellets, It still works after all these years and the pellets work for quite a long time.  As a matter of fact I ran it for about a minute and it started smoking tonight while I finished installing my crossing lights.  It went around the loop one time and I noticed it was smoking.  I have cleaned it once or twice but they knew how to build them to last.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×