Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I bought it when it first came out.  It is B&W and a pretty low resolution image.  They sold a small Railscope TV which was the right size....any bigger screen and the picture would have been too grainy.  It used the track to transmit the signal.  So, just like flickering passenger cars, the picture would have dropouts when going over switches or dirty track.  It was great for its time, but the technology has improved so much since then.  Get a small hi-res color camera with transmitter and put it on a flatcar at the front of your train. 

They worked OK.  Not up to today's standards.  It's black and white.  I think that for kids it could be a good little project.  Not hard to set up.  I have one with a modified MPC 6464 wired to hold the battery.  I'd probably let it go for not too much if you're interested.

Alan

Originally Posted by jim sutter:

The Lionel Railscope went through batteries, like a hot knife going through butter.

The camera/transmitter engine mounted 9 volt battery was depleted very quickly. The receiver/RF converter wasn't too bad.

 

I have a 9 volt battery pack - 6 AA cells in a battery holder - mounted in a 9707 behind the engine to power the camera, this is much more economical and longer lasting.

For less than $100 you can get a color Hi-res camera that will wifi into any ipad or tv etc.  Guy selling them at york.

Very small, about the size of an EGG!

I have a railscope system I got for $75.  Got it for my son (the electrical engineering major) as a present, not that we are going to actually use it!!

Ben

Regarding the battery issue: Lionel released a kit to use larger batteries in a holder to be hidden in a boxcar behind the locomotive. I forget whether it used "D" or "C" cells.

I don't think there was anything special in the kit, you probably can get the same components at Radio Shack and make your own.

Someone mentioned doing something similar above.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×