Skip to main content

I like mixed consists as well.  Using heavyweight baggage or RPO cars really helps when you don't happen to have the requisite "matching" streamlined baggage car (broken sets).  The best part is that mixing things up is prototypical.  Most runs had some odd cars mixed in.  Railroads used what they had available and even "shared" cars when the need arose.

Here is a Williams 14" set of Erie-Lackawanna with repainted Marx E-7 A and B units.  I run them just the way the set came:  One U.S. Mail, a combination, two coaches and an observation.

 

(When mentioning in my earlier post that the B & O was my only set, I guess the brain just saw "Madison" in the thread title, and flashed "Lionel").

IMG_4695

IMG_4700

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_4695
  • IMG_4700
Very good-looking set.  Again, you got the colors right.  The Marx units never looked so good.
 
Technically, these are supposed to be called heavyweights.  Nevertheless, Lionel, MTH, and Williams still use the term "Madison" (adopted after the early Lionel "Madison" name for their Bakelite heavyweights or perhaps from Madison Hardware).  K-Line, as far as I know, always referred to them as "heavyweights."
 
This wasn't the first time that a prototype acquired the nickname of a model.  No matter how hard they try, manufacturers of 48:1 trains just don't seem to be able to duplicate the beauty of the original 1:1 O Scale versions.  Or am I confused here?
 
Gordon
 
Originally Posted by TrainsRMe:

Here is a Williams 14" set of Erie-Lackawanna with repainted Marx E-7 A and B units.  I run them just the way the set came:  One U.S. Mail, a combination, two coaches and an observation.

 

(When mentioning in my earlier post that the B & O was my only set, I guess the brain just saw "Madison" in the thread title, and flashed "Lionel").

 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×