Skip to main content

The Ross Custom Switches website indicates that prewar trains will have an issue going through the frog on their switches due to the flange depth. 

Has anyone here attempted to grind the flangeway down to make it deeper in an attempt to get them to work with prewar trains? If so, what were the results?

Thanks

John

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It is not so much the flange depth, but the width/thickness of the wheel flanges on the prewar engines.  Years ago I modified the frogs on some Ross switches so my prewar Flyer could fit through them.  I never liked the results and when I rebuilt the layout, I went without switches and eventually ripped up all my gargraves track and went back to tubular track.  I like the tubular track with the prewar trains much better.  

Last edited by Nation Wide Lines
George S posted:

For Standard Gauge, it's Ross switches only

George,

You are absolutely correct!   Ross's Standard Gauge switches are "trouble free" no doubt as a result of SGMA members direct participation in their development, testing and refinement to ensure their operation would work with the wide variety of Standard Gauge trains owned by SGMA members.  However, the same cannot be said for Ross's O gauge switches as SGMA members played no role in the development, testing and refinement of Ross's O gauge switches.  

Bob Nelson

navy.seal posted:
George S posted:

For Standard Gauge, it's Ross switches only

George,

You are absolutely correct!   Ross's Standard Gauge switches are "trouble free" no doubt as a result of SGMA members direct participation in their development, testing and refinement to ensure their operation would work with the wide variety of Standard Gauge trains owned by SGMA members.  However, the same cannot be said for Ross's O gauge switches as SGMA members played no role in the development, testing and refinement of Ross's O gauge switches.  

Bob Nelson

Yep, that's why I got rid of all my other brands of O gauge switches including Ross and bought Merkur switches.

George

George S posted:
navy.seal posted:
George S posted:

For Standard Gauge, it's Ross switches only

George,

You are absolutely correct!   Ross's Standard Gauge switches are "trouble free" no doubt as a result of SGMA members direct participation in their development, testing and refinement to ensure their operation would work with the wide variety of Standard Gauge trains owned by SGMA members.  However, the same cannot be said for Ross's O gauge switches as SGMA members played no role in the development, testing and refinement of Ross's O gauge switches.  

Bob Nelson

Yep, that's why I got rid of all my other brands of O gauge switches including Ross and bought Merkur switches.

George

My Ross SG switches are fantastic--I couldn't be happier with them. 

George, do you know if Merkur makes anything that resembles a #4 switch? Are you running any modern trains, and if so, how do they play with the Merkur switches?

BlueComet400 posted:
George S posted:
navy.seal posted:
George S posted:

For Standard Gauge, it's Ross switches only

George,

You are absolutely correct!   Ross's Standard Gauge switches are "trouble free" no doubt as a result of SGMA members direct participation in their development, testing and refinement to ensure their operation would work with the wide variety of Standard Gauge trains owned by SGMA members.  However, the same cannot be said for Ross's O gauge switches as SGMA members played no role in the development, testing and refinement of Ross's O gauge switches.  

Bob Nelson

Yep, that's why I got rid of all my other brands of O gauge switches including Ross and bought Merkur switches.

George

My Ross SG switches are fantastic--I couldn't be happier with them. 

George, do you know if Merkur makes anything that resembles a #4 switch? Are you running any modern trains, and if so, how do they play with the Merkur switches?

I think we have had this conversation before... 

No, the largest radius Merkur switch is 900mm, which is O72. Only recently have you seen tubular track in larger radius than O72. They are made for tinplate trains. Modern engines run just fine on them. I have several. 

I think you need to decide what is most important. If you want #4 realism, then you won't be able to run some tinplate trains. Also, I find tinplate likes tubular track better than low profile rails. However, if you go with Merkur, you sacrifice realism, but you can run anything.

George

The number indicates the angle of the switch or turnout;  the larger the number, the more gradual the turnout; for a #4, it takes 4 inches of track for the rails to separate 1 inch. For a #6, it would take 6 inches, and so on.

Ross switches (both their traditional line and the "Rossplate" line) mate with traditional tubular track. The Rossplate switches are the same height as tubular track, so they will mate perfectly. The traditional Ross switches with the wooden ties are a lower profile and therefore require special pins and shims under the switches for them to mate with tubular track.

With that said, the switches are compatible with tubular track. The real issue is compatibility with the trains. If you're running modern trains, you'll be ok; if you're running prewar tinplate, the trains and Ross switches aren't compatible. This is straight from Steve B. himself; I've had many conversations with him about this, as recently as a year ago, and I got the impression that there are no plans to build switches that work with prewar trains with the deeper-flanged wheels.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×