Skip to main content

This passenger outfit, a tunnel and a station arrived today. The seller had said it ran, but upon further questioning he said it wobbled badly, sparked badly and would short out and stall. It did run out of the box, but........... Ends up the wobble and shorting were the same issue. A bent axle. The bent axle would hit the collector and short it out. Split the shell, removed the drivers and straightened the axle, put it back together and away we go. Other than the wire to the headlight, this one is all original.

 

Steve

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Steve, 

 

A very interesting video, thanks. When seeing the Dorfan 425 station I thought it looked familiar. I have a station which has no trademark but was sold to me as being Kraus Fandor wich looks very similar; see the pictures. The station base-plate measures 22 by 10 cm. The Dorfan station seems to have lithographed windows and doors while the Kraus Fandor has no doors, just openings, and separate window inserts and awnings above the door openings. There are 2 contacts for (I asume) lighting the station.

Kraus Fandor [1)

Kraus Fandor [2)

 

Regards

Fred

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Kraus Fandor (1)
  • Kraus Fandor (2)
Originally Posted by handyandy:

After seeing all these Dorfan posts, I'm starting to become a fan of Dorfan! Pretty neat little trains.

 

What amazes me is the bent axle. With the usual fragility of Dorfan die-cast, how could the axle have bent without damaging the wheels or the body?

I agree completely with this bolded portion!

Fred
The Dorfan station is all litho, no punched out openings.
 
Steve
 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by sncf231e:

Steve, 

 

A very interesting video, thanks. When seeing the Dorfan 425 station I thought it looked familiar. I have a station which has no trademark but was sold to me as being Kraus Fandor wich looks very similar; see the pictures. The station base-plate measures 22 by 10 cm. The Dorfan station seems to have lithographed windows and doors while the Kraus Fandor has no doors, just openings, and separate window inserts and awnings above the door openings. There are 2 contacts for (I asume) lighting the station.

 

 

 

Regards

Fred

 

IMG_1002

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_1002

Fred, your station is the same Dorfan "Montclair" #425 station.    The lithographed version is earlier, the later versions were enameled.  Since the later versions also had doors and windows punched out of the tin, they also were able to add interior lighting which would not have worked with the closed litho version.  The two slots in the front of the enameled station are for a tinplate clock bracket which stands out from the building, it replaces the litho clock on the earlier version. The tinplate awnings also replaced the lithographed awnings.  On some of the later ones, the roof and interior light bar are held on by an ingenious system of metal snaps that i have not seen used on other tinplate.

 

david

 

 

Originally Posted by hojack:

Fred, your station is the same Dorfan "Montclair" #425 station.    The lithographed version is earlier, the later versions were enameled.  Since the later versions also had doors and windows punched out of the tin, they also were able to add interior lighting which would not have worked with the closed litho version.  The two slots in the front of the enameled station are for a tinplate clock bracket which stands out from the building, it replaces the litho clock on the earlier version. The tinplate awnings also replaced the lithographed awnings.  On some of the later ones, the roof and interior light bar are held on by an ingenious system of metal snaps that i have not seen used on other tinplate.

 

david

 

 

David,

 

Thank you for this information; I assume that the later versions were still from the 1930's? According to the TCA Western description of Dorfan (http://www.tcawestern.org/dorfan.htm), the Dorfan stations were made by (Kraus-)Fandor. I wonder whether any of these have a trademark (my station has not) and would that be Dorfan or Fandor?

 

Regards

Fred

Originally Posted by handyandy:

....

 

What amazes me is the bent axle. With the usual fragility of Dorfan die-cast, how could the axle have bent without damaging the wheels or the body?

according to the McKenney (Greenberg) text, the copper-zinc based Dorfan alloy was touted and likely demonstrated as being extremely rugged.  "...it has been reported that when new, a diecast locomotive ...could be thrown against a concrete floor and not break!"

 

it was only after a few years when impurities in the zinc began to oxidize and expand that cracks in the shell started to compromise the integrity of most Dorfan alloy castings.

 

cheers...gary

Originally Posted by overlandflyer:
Originally Posted by handyandy:

....

 

What amazes me is the bent axle. With the usual fragility of Dorfan die-cast, how could the axle have bent without damaging the wheels or the body?

according to the McKenney (Greenberg) text, the copper-zinc based Dorfan alloy was touted and likely demonstrated as being extremely rugged.  "...it has been reported that when new, a diecast locomotive ...could be thrown against a concrete floor and not break!"

 

it was only after a few years when impurities in the zinc began to oxidize and expand that cracks in the shell started to compromise the integrity of most Dorfan alloy castings.

 

cheers...gary

 

OK, thanks for the info Gary. The loco must have fell off the table (or whatever) early in life.

 

Originally Posted by sncf231e:
Originally Posted by hojack:

Fred, your station is the same Dorfan "Montclair" #425 station.    The lithographed version is earlier, the later versions were enameled.  Since the later versions also had doors and windows punched out of the tin, they also were able to add interior lighting which would not have worked with the closed litho version.  The two slots in the front of the enameled station are for a tinplate clock bracket which stands out from the building, it replaces the litho clock on the earlier version. The tinplate awnings also replaced the lithographed awnings.  On some of the later ones, the roof and interior light bar are held on by an ingenious system of metal snaps that i have not seen used on other tinplate.

 

david

 

 

David,

 

Thank you for this information; I assume that the later versions were still from the 1930's? According to the TCA Western description of Dorfan (http://www.tcawestern.org/dorfan.htm), the Dorfan stations were made by (Kraus-)Fandor. I wonder whether any of these have a trademark (my station has not) and would that be Dorfan or Fandor?

 

Regards

Fred

 

 

I would question the idea that Fandor manufactured the Dorfan Monclair 425 station.  There was a relationship between the companies, but not to that extent.  Imports from Germany were limited or restricted in the 1930's.   Fandor was also under increasing pressure in Germany in the 30's, and in no position to help.  Dorfan was pretty much on their own, and they did their manufacturing in this country.

 

Here is a Fandor station from about the same period (possibly a little earlier?), and it is marked as such.

 

Fandor station 1

Fandor station 2

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Fandor station 1
  • Fandor station 2
Originally Posted by sncf231e:

David,

 

 a copy of Dorfan Modern Electric Train Catalog of 1930. The Station No 424 looks like your Fandor station. I am puzzled!

 

Regards

Fred

 

Yes, and the larger station below, the #426, is one I have several of, it is definitely a Fandor station. So it would seem I am wrong, Dorfan did sell Fandor-made stations, at least as late as 1930.  The 1920's to early 1930's was when a lot of Bing was sold in this country also.  It was during the mid- to late 1930's that conditions changed in Europe,  prior to that there was more German imports.  When did Dorfan start?  Quite late 1920's I believe, so Fandor may have helped supply inventory as it was getting started?

 

david

This passenger outfit, a tunnel and a station arrived today. The seller had said it ran, but upon further questioning he said it wobbled badly, sparked badly and would short out and stall. It did run out of the box, but........... Ends up the wobble and shorting were the same issue. A bent axle. The bent axle would hit the collector and short it out. Split the shell, removed the drivers and straightened the axle, put it back together and away we go. Other than the wire to the headlight, this one is all original.



Steve



Photo? Always great to hear that any engine Dorfan original, runs.

I believe Dorfan began in this country in 1924 in Newark, NJ. Fandor & Dorfan are reverses of each other & named for the two mothers who were sisters, Fanny & Dora. The Kraus (Fandor) cousin  stayed in  Germany. Cousins Forchheimers , Milton and Julius , came to America flipping the name to Dorfan. The Joseph Kraus firm often helped the new  American cousins with accessories for example.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×