Skip to main content

50-1033 remote

I currently have a Legacy Control system on my 3 rail O Gauge layout. I have a couple MTH proto 2 & 3 Locos that I would like to run on the Layout. Will this Operate the locos and not cause a problem with the Legacy Control system? The manual did not have any info on this.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 50-1033 remote
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I have had this system on my otherwise (and mostly) -TMCC layout for years.  It does work on the layout (1990, pre-DCS wiring), but under some conditions the DCS system can be lost, apparently. It seems that a TMCC brass loco on the same track can kill the DCS signal (the TMCC, as usual, just soldiers on - "don't care 'bout no stinkin' DCS signal"). But, I have run my Lionel SP AC-9 in TMCC and an MTH PS2 steamer (I forget which one) in DCS successfully, simultaneously, one behind the other, with a CAB-1 in one hand and the Remote Commander in the other.

The Remote Commander is cheap, and easy to install, and even if performance is spotty here and there, it's worth having.

Anyone have an idea what the largest layout this remote commander might still work on? Mine is merely 10'x16'.

This seems like a low cost, low risk remote option for a couple of Mth diesels I just picked up. They run very well with my Lionel TPC unit. Command voltage might let me get more out of the smoke unit and possibly even slower starting speeds.

Second hand full DCS command sets are obviously inflated . Along with the fact  there are just too many variables between versions, updates, and issues like them failing  over time.

@RickO posted:

Anyone have an idea what the largest layout this remote commander might still work on? Mine is merely 10'x16'.

That's a question akin to asking: How long is a road?

There are far too many variables on any layout to answer that question with any degree of accuracy.  Suffice to say that more than 100-120 feet of track would probably be a major challenge for the DCS-RC, and it's quite likely that even that amount of track would be too much.  It stands to reason that however much track you had, it would have to be all one power district. Switches and crossovers, etc. would take a significant toll on the amount of track it could support as well.

The signal from the DCS-RC is much lower in amplitude than from a TIU, and the TIU struggles with more than 200-250 feet of track on one channel.

I am a novice at this, but I thought that the basic DCS systems can’t handle the high wattage power supplies. I know that DCS Explorer was limited to 100 watt supply.

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Correct mostly:

The IR DCS commander 50-1033 can be run in passive mode- thus bypassing this current limit.

The DCS Explorer Wifi cannot be used passive, and thus IS restricted to internal current limits.

Passive mode is where the device is just "adding" the DCS signal to the track, but power from your power source is run separate and typically must have an inductor (choke) so as to not degrade the DCS signal.

one example discussion of passive mode and IR commander

https://ogrforum.com/...hrough-switch?page=1

Last edited by Vernon Barry

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×