Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Nice to have something on your Dad's original toys, isn't it?  That is a handsome loco and in good condition, it appears.  I have a similar loco I bought and restored, but it is not special to me like yours is, just something I bought and restored to running because I always really liked the look of the postwar 2-6-4s and wanted but never had one as a kid.  

 

I do have a loco my Dad had a kid (below) - pre-war,  only tinplate and wind-up Marx, but still pretty cool nonetheless, at least to me: I never run mine although I bought a similar one via an auction site and fitted it with electric drive so I can run in on my layout. 

Slide19

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Slide19

My first train had a 2-6-4 engine, that was 1953. My grandfather played with it, my father played with it, I played with it, my son played with it, and my granddaughter has run it.

  It was not treated well during part of it's life, but it still runs, the headlight works(no smoke unit), the reversing unit works, and I treasure it.

  I have never found a prototype of a 2-6-4 but have read there were a few, on some railroads. The 4-6-4t (tanker) was common on some short lines and narrow gauge but I have never found a picture of a 2-6-4. At one time I tried to modify the wheel configuration to 4-6-2 but had technical problems and couldn't.

Douglas

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

Nice to have something on your Dad's original toys, isn't it?  That is a handsome loco and in good condition, it appears.  I have a similar loco I bought and restored, but it is not special to me like yours is, just something I bought and restored to running because I always really liked the look of the postwar 2-6-4s and wanted but never had one as a kid.  

 

I do have a loco my Dad had a kid (below) - pre-war,  only tinplate and wind-up Marx, but still pretty cool nonetheless, at least to me: I never run mine although I bought a similar one via an auction site and fitted it with electric drive so I can run in on my layout. 

Slide19

Very cool

Originally Posted by 1688torpedo:

Chuck-  You are correct about the 637s having a streamlined 2046 tender. My 637 had the square 243 tender exactly as pictured above. I imagine some folks exchanged tenders for the ones they liked better. Perhaps this is what Khaydens Grandfather did?

I don't think the tender was swapped all I know is my dad got the set from his aunt I think

Originally Posted by Khayden93:
Originally Posted by 1688torpedo:

Chuck-  You are correct about the 637s having a streamlined 2046 tender. My 637 had the square 243 tender exactly as pictured above. I imagine some folks exchanged tenders for the ones they liked better. Perhaps this is what Khaydens Grandfather did?

I don't think the tender was swapped all I know is my dad got the set from his aunt I think

Based on the age of the rolling stock(newer than the loco) and the note on the box("637 loco") it looks like the tender is original, the loco was swapped in.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×