Originally Posted by Enginear-Joe:
I'm kind of wondering what will be in the new catalog? Maybe just new paint schemes?
...
There was a big down turn in G gauge sales supposedly a few years back, and now I'm waiting to see what they'll come up with.
Originally Posted by Enginear-Joe:
.... MTH already released their Big Boy in 1/32. I doubt if they'll do another in 1/29. There also was talk about maybe they should have went with 1/29 scale instead, when they entered G scale. I think it was fine. I think they shouldn't have abandoned it so soon. If they had released a 1/32 scale autocarrier and more modern larger cars, they might have made a bigger impact. Everyone complained about the smaller 1/32 scale releases. Their first large steamers sold out and are hard to find. ...
if MTH does release another catalog, i hope they make some better product decisions. i think they initially got a few things right, but a few things wrong.
they chose the correct scale (1:32) for #1 gauge track (45mm), but then produced over half their rolling stock with fantasy names (M&M's, Harley Davidson, etc), something that probably appeals more to the fantasy 1:29 scale crowd.
i have two #1 gauge, 1:32 scale freight locomotives and there is barely a handful of 1:32 scale rolling stock out there currently available. MTH and Accucraft are the two largest in this scale and neither has produced a major run of cars in years.
MTH...
1) come up with one or two small 1:32 scale steam locomotives. you've done the Hudson to death; the GS4 was nice, but big; ditto on the Big Boy and Challenger. i'd fire the person who thought the Erie Triplex would appeal to more than even a few Erie fans. what you need is an 0-4-0 switcher or Atlantic, of course, in 1:32. this would get the 1:32 scale into the smaller radius layouts; something that is always a problem with large steam.
don't think people won't pay just as much as a small locomotive than for a large one. most people should realize it takes only a fraction less to build a 4-4-2 than a 4-8-4, but with the increased operational capability, it would be worth it as far as i'm concerned.
2) i understand that the fantasy cars probably help pay some bills, but please produce more roadnames with actual car liveries. we do not care if they are all boxcar brown if that is the way they originally appeared. there are plenty of references out there to get it right.
3) get rid of the action cars (helo, dump cars). again, they would more likely appeal to the fantasy 1:29 scale groups. they have no place behind a #1 scale locomotive.
4) you have the boxcar and flat, now you need the other basics... 52' gondola, 40' wood reefer, 10000gal tank, 36' hopper. you can do those to death for a decade and not repeat a roadname.
5) a couple more caboose shapes wouldn't hurt.