Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

this statement raised all kinds of red flags in my opinion.

"
Although the 765 has moved over these rails before [the most recent being in
2011], the reason given by a G&W VP for Transportation is that safety is
their major concern. In his comments, he expressed that G&W is not
comfortable with passengers, and certainly not comfortable with a steam
locomotive pulling them over the intended route which is felt to be satisfactory
for freight but not for passengers."

 

would loved to have been a fly on the wall to hear the real reason.

Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:

this statement raised all kinds of red flags in my opinion.

"
Although the 765 has moved over these rails before [the most recent being in
2011], the reason given by a G&W VP for Transportation is that safety is
their major concern. In his comments, he expressed that G&W is not
comfortable with passengers, and certainly not comfortable with a steam
locomotive pulling them over the intended route which is felt to be satisfactory
for freight but not for passengers."

 

would loved to have been a fly on the wall to hear the real reason.

Another case of "Paranoia will destroy ya!".

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×