Skip to main content

I had a problem with the white molex connectors that come with the 180 bricks.  Several of them browned up from heat generated from the resistance in the connection.

 

I clipped off all the molexes and replaced them with anderson power poles.  No trouble since.

 

 

I also reduced the length because the cord it self was somewhat thinner gauge than I would like,  so I minimized the length and therefore resistance.

 

 

Last edited by BillP
Originally Posted by Pine Creek Railroad:

Gentlemen,

   I do believe Lionel has figured out their 180 Brick is damaging their ZW-L sales in a pretty large way.  As most of you know I am not a big advocate of Bricks, however this particular PH 180 was about the best non-transformer deal Lionel had on the market,

if you plan on using them, better get them ASAP cause your cost on them just skyrocked/doubled, with the new package.  To bad too, I know a lot of you guys liked them, especially at such a reasonable cost.  As Guns says they have the best breaker on the market.

PCRR/Dave

Unless I mis-read Rich's update to his first post, I think he is saying that initial assertion ended up being an error, and is not true (the part of only being able to buy with GW-180).

 

While the cost may go up somewhat with the re-design and the next time they are put in a catalog, it's probably not likely to double.

 

-Dave

Last edited by Dave45681

I favor soldering spade lugs on the PoHo 180s secondary cord. It enables easy and effective connection to the TIU binding posts, on TPC T-boards or to railpower distribution T-strips.

It also makes sense to shortened the cord as much as feasible as suggested by BillP above. I wire-gauged the PoHo's stranded copper conductors as only #18..

IMG_2155-001

IMG_2072

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_2155-001
  • IMG_2072
Last edited by Dewey Trogdon
Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Unless I mis-read Rich's update to his first post, I think he is saying that initial assertion ended up being an error, and is not true (the part of only being able to buy with GW-180).

 

While the cost may go up somewhat with the re-design and the next time they are put in a catalog, it's probably not likely to double.

 

-Dave

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:
Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Unless I mis-read Rich's update to his first post, I think he is saying that initial assertion ended up being an error, and is not true (the part of only being able to buy with GW-180).

 

While the cost may go up somewhat with the re-design and the next time they are put in a catalog, it's probably not likely to double.

 

-Dave

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

One good reason, unless for extra protection you're intention is to connect to a TMCC locon, there's no need for a molex connector with the ZW-1 out of production.

I can't think of any other reason to change anything. The brick is a near perfect inexpensive power source. I've had two powering my layout for at least 10 years with no problem.

Joe

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

My money is still on a simple issue like parts obsolescence/availability I suggested earlier, but if John doesn't let us in on the real deal we will never know. 

 

I can live with that (unless they actually do double in price ! )

 

-Dave

 

Last edited by Dave45681
Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

My money is still on a simple issue like parts obsolescence/availability I suggested earlier, but if John doesn't let us in on the real deal we will never know. 

 

I can live with that (unless they actually do double in price ! )

 

-Dave

 

You can bet your bottom they'll be more than the current model 

I am glad I have 4 connected to a TIU (one for each Channel).  With downsizing my layout I will not need to purchase any more even giving a Z4000 to both of my sons and a Purepower for the layout in CT. Contrary to my current power requirements 4 180 bricks, 3 Z4000s, one PurePower and two post war ZWs, I anticipate that 1 Z4000 and 4 bricks will provide sufficient power for the redesigned layout.

Last edited by winrose46
Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

My money is still on a simple issue like parts obsolescence/availability I suggested earlier, but if John doesn't let us in on the real deal we will never know. 

 

I can live with that (unless they actually do double in price ! )

 

-Dave

 

If they changed the internals, we mere customers wouldn't even know nor need to know. Now if they change the case for no reason...

Originally Posted by Pine Creek Railroad:

Gentlemen,

   I guess we will see in the near future if the GW must be purchased with the PH 180 or not.  Rich may very well be correct.  To me it would seem a little extreme, however it just might be the way Lionel is going to package the PH 180 now, it comes down to profit margin as usual.

 

PCRR/Dave

That simply can't be the case.  That would take the PH180 from $99.99 MSRP to $279.99 MSRP!  Tripling the price would put it totally out of reach for most folks.  Now it's a very cost effective power source, at that price it would be a hopelessly overpriced power source!

 

I'm sure the competition would love it, they'd sell a lot more transformers.  Think of MTH and MRC for instance.  Suddenly, they'd be less expensive dollars per watt, and with more functionality!

 

That move would make no sense.

 

Originally Posted by JC642:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:
Originally Posted by Dave45681:
Unless I mis-read Rich's update to his first post, I think he is saying that initial assertion ended up being an error, and is not true (the part of only being able to buy with GW-180).

 

While the cost may go up somewhat with the re-design and the next time they are put in a catalog, it's probably not likely to double.

 

-Dave

I'm still trying to understand what they are "re-designing".

 

One good reason, unless for extra protection you're intention is to connect to a TMCC locon, there's no need for a molex connector with the ZW-1 out of production.

I can't think of any other reason to change anything. The brick is a near perfect inexpensive power source. I've had two powering my layout for at least 10 years with no problem.

Joe

The plug still worked with Power Masters and TPCs, not just ZW-C.  So would be weird to redesign with a plug that is not backward compatible.  G

Originally Posted by Balto:

If the PH 180 is not available because of redesign how can they still make the GW 180 or the ZW transformers available. They also use the PH 180? 

I'd bet they ran into a shortage of a component, Happens all the time in electronics.

Now, when that happens you buy all you can get of the old part and halt separate sales to use them in whatever sets they are in until new production is available.

Then you re-release under a slightly different number / name so folks can tell them apart.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×