Skip to main content

In the April, 2012 issue of TRAINS magazine on page 71 it reads:

"The A-B-A lash-up (considered a single loclmotive in those early days of dieselization) newly resplendent in  Santa Fe's famous red, gold, and silver "warbonnet" scheme........"

 

What's a "Lash-up"?

 

I don't know Rich, your argument about that term is running out of steam!

 

- walt

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Well, it's obvious that this term has been used in some other media not a part of the OGR family.  No one in the OGR family would ever allow the use of the term.  Even real railroaders have been known to have been chastised severely by the editor for a serious violation of the railroad terminology.  After all, if no such thing exists, how could anyone be able to do it?

Originally Posted by DM&E_Bobby:

I don't get why people don't like the "lash-up" term. They claim it's inaccurate yet it seems everyone uses it. LOL

Gee, I don't know about that.  I kind of like the term because it "fits" in a sentence better and is more descriptive to most folks, i.e.:

 

"Ted lashed-up the two locomotives and then proceeded to...."

vs--

"Ted MU'ed the two locomotives...."

 

However, the boss (he's a real railroader and I'm not) doesn't like it so we (OGR) generally try to avoid it.  Despite our best efforts, it does manage to slip into the magazine from time to time. 

Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:

According to Wikipedia's Glossary of rail transport terms; in the section that addresses Multiple-unit train control,  it states that "lash-up" is the colloquial term for consist. 

 

Granted, "consisting" sounds better than "lash-uping".  

I've been around a long time, and I've never heard the term lash-up used to describe an entire train (a consist).  Have only heard it used in regard to the connecting of multiple power units.

Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:

According to Wikipedia's Glossary of rail transport terms; in the section that addresses Multiple-unit train control,  it states that "lash-up" is the colloquial term for consist. 

 

Granted, "consisting" sounds better than "lash-uping".  

If Wikipedia tells me "The sun rises in the east and sets in the west.", I would prefer to check it out tomorrow morning!

Originally Posted by Allan Miller:
Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:

According to Wikipedia's Glossary of rail transport terms; in the section that addresses Multiple-unit train control,  it states that "lash-up" is the colloquial term for consist. 

 

Granted, "consisting" sounds better than "lash-uping".  

I've been around a long time, and I've never heard the term lash-up used to describe an entire train (a consist).  Have only heard it used in regard to the connecting of multiple power units.

Where did you get a reference to an entire train from my post?   Read my post again and you'll see that I was referring to the section  addressing  Multiple-unit train control.  That section talks about diesel or electric locomotives being "joined together to form a consist, and are said to be "MUed" together". 

 

There is another section addressing the term "consist" and its various uses/meanings, including the entire train.  There is no mention of "lash-up" there.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:

According to Wikipedia's Glossary of rail transport terms; in the section that addresses Multiple-unit train control,  it states that "lash-up" is the colloquial term for consist. 

 

Granted, "consisting" sounds better than "lash-uping".  

If Wikipedia tells me "The sun rises in the east and sets in the west.", I would prefer to check it out tomorrow morning!

Actually, their reference(45) is "Glossary Of Common Railroad Terms", by Kalmbach Publishing.  

 

Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:
Actually, their reference(45) is "Glossary Of Common Railroad Terms", by Kalmbach Publishing.

Ahhh, Kalmbach.

 

That obviously makes it the honest-to-God gospel truth, absolutely correct and never to be challenged.  

I could reference  OGR's own Guide to the TrainMaster Command System video starring the OGR Webmaster.   Surely that contains honest to God gospel truth, absolutely correct and never to be challenged.  

 

My older copy contains much reference to creating, well; you know what.  

 

Last edited by Mike Norberg
Originally Posted by Mike Norberg:
I could reference  OGR's own Guide to the TrainMaster Command System video starring the OGR Webmaster.   Surely that contains honest to God gospel truth, absolutely correct and never to be challenged.  

 

My older copy contains much reference to creating, well; you know what. 

Yes, there are many uses of the dreaded word 'LASHUP' in that video. You'll hear it in our DCS video, too. You hear it because that is the term the manufacturers used, and that's the term that appears in the instructions. I didn't LIKE to say it, but I had to do it. 

 

As for the video and the on-camera host giving you the honest-to-God truth...I don't know. That guy on the video looks pretty shady to me. 

On a serious note (I know, who asked for serious on a thread like this), many of the comments refer to MU-ing.  Since that term generally applies to diesel or electric locomotive, and MU-ing means to tie them together with all the necessary control and power lines and air hoses, perhaps that's where the L word originated?

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×