Skip to main content

Does anyone actually know the real CONTINUOUS rating of the original Lionel ZW? And what is the real continuous rating of the "275W" ZW. I say "continuous" meaning for continuous duty at max. output, not a "1 hour" or "intermittent" rating.

I have heard that the Lionel ZW actually rates on a continuous basis as low as 150W and not 275.....

I know that transformers are rated on "temperature rise" above a certain ambient and I am also certain that old transformers with possible loose laminate stack (that buzz when operating), old insulation systems, etc. are a risk if their ratings are exceeded.

Should I assume that the MTH Z4000 and the new Lionel ZW-L are also rated on a CONTINUOUS basis?

I am in the market for another transformer and want to either continue the use of my 275W ZW or upgrade to a new supply with more power and recent advancements such as circuit protection, etc. so I can use the above info if anyone has it to share.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

I have always felt that the maximum output of a pw ZW was in the 170-180 watt range as its efficiency dropped when hot from continous running but it is difficult to pin it down.

During the early-mid 1990s I was operating 3 pw 275 ZWs to supply trains on five 14x32 tracks, ovals that were basic run and display. After 1-2 hours when they were warm to hot the efficiency definitely dropped. I was on sometimes iffy TVA power so I always kept a check on the service voltage that at times in summer dropped to 108-110 VAC. Normally it registered 120VAC.

I only had a wattage meter check once by a Mountain Electric Rep and fellow O-gauger nearing the end of a 3 hour running stint and it read 178 watts. The Fluke clamp on ammeter reading on A&B combined was just under 9 amps. The load: with the "A" throttle wide open on my 30 hopper coal train behind a Challenger and a 14 car[11 lighted] passenger car train behind 4-motored Weaver E8s on track #2 with throttle "B" wide open. I had often blown external connected cartridge fuses in the 2-3 hour running period absent finding a short of any type so rightly or wrong I had concluded that it began to overload max capacity as the efficiency dropped...

A Engineer and O-gauger from the Ordnance Plant in East Tennessee claimed similar results but I don't know his protocol.
My guess is that for short term efficient running the total net output is probably around 200 watts or 10+ amps.

I agree that 170 watts or so is about max continuous load on a ZW; and even then it will get very hot. The problem is that the case is enclosed, and there is no cooling.

I tested a Z-4000 a couple of years ago at a continuous 400 watt load and the air at the outlet was about 25-30 degrees warmer than the room temp.

It worked just great. The input was right around 550 watts all the while.

 

Rod

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×