Skip to main content

I know that passenger cars have diaphragms that press against each other making the whole consist rigid more or less.  Freight trains of course do not have this and cars run in and out with slack.    With slack you can bunch up or stretch depending on the situation, whereas there is minimal passenger slack to work with.  Also if freight bumps somewhat (rough stops), no harm done than if same braking and throttle action was done with passenger consist (jolting or tossing passengers in seats) as on freight.

 

My question is (obviously) do you have to handle the train brakes and throttle way differently if using the same engine, in each case, ?

 

Just curious.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by rrman:

I know that passenger cars have diaphragms that press against each other making the whole consist rigid more or less. 

 

Well, not exactly. Passenger trains have slack also, and those diaphragms are NOT like the buffers used on European equipment to eliminate all slack.

 

Freight trains of course do not have this and cars run in and out with slack.    With slack you can bunch up or stretch depending on the situation, whereas there is minimal passenger slack to work with.  Also if freight bumps somewhat (rough stops), no harm done than if same braking and throttle action was done with passenger consist (jolting or tossing passengers in seats) as on freight.

 

My question is (obviously) do you have to handle the train brakes and throttle way differently if using the same engine, in each case, ?

 

Basically, passenger trains can be handled VERY smoothly by proper use of the train air in conjunction with locomotive power, i.e. "stretch braking". In todays modern age of freight train railroading, the use of dynamic braking is MANDATORY, and a locomotive Engineer could very well be disciplined for NOT using DB if it is functional and available. 

 

Just curious.

 

There is quite a bit of difference.

 

On freight cars, when the brakes are applied on the cars and the automatic brake valve raises the brake pipe pressure (even just a couple of PSI) ALL of the cars release their brakes completely.  So, when you stop a freight train, the brakes remain fully applied to the level that you applied them until the train stops.

 

On passenger cars, when the brakes are applied, the release of brakes can be graduated by making several brake pipe increases using the automatic brake valve.  This allows smooth stops and smooth transitions from slowing the train for a curve or other reason.

 

Demonstrate what this does, in your automobile, by applying the brake and not easing up at all on the brake pedal until the car comes to a solid stop that makes your head bobble.  Then repeat the stop, easing up on the brake pedal as you come to a smooth stop.

 

There's more to passenger train handling, of course, and finesse is very important for passenger comfort.  Although the air brakes on passenger equipment are capable of very high performance, you have to resist hot rodding, because it is very uncomfortable for the passengers, and you might be able to decelerate at a rate that could cause a standing passenger to lose their balance, fall, and sustain an injury.  Historically, most Engineers who were disqualified from passenger service either spilled the food in the diner or caused a passenger to fall.  Because you are usually covering ground very fast on passenger, you have to always be thinking ahead about rapidly approaching curves, restrictions, stops, etc. You take all the turnouts at less than their permissible speed.  You never, never get caught dreaming and go around a curve too fast.  On freight, you also have to think ahead, but you usually have to begin reducing speed earlier because it takes more distance to slow or stop, due to the length and weight of the train.

 

And slack -- Hot Water is correct.  There is definitely slack on passenger equipment and you could definitely give noticeable and uncomfortable slack action by mishandling the air brakes.

Oh yes, slack action on passenger trains!  Was on a long-ago (1961) fan trip out of the long-gone B&O Grand Central Station in Chicago, powered by Dick Jensen's ex-GTW 4-6-2 #5629. Departing the station the trackage converged on a sharp curve and rather abrupt grade, heading to the Chicago River bridge. Good old 5629 had a heck of a time on that curve, slipping like crazy, which immediately suspended forward progress, sending slack action shock waves through the train. Things got so severe that an elderly lady fell and broke her arm. A B&OCT SW was coupled on to the rear of the train, and we marched smartly up the curve and the grade, and on to fan trip glory!

There certainly is a difference.  While my experience was all at low speeds, starting stopping and braking a passenger train is all about finesse.  There is some slack in between the cars, and in fact how tight the cars are too each other has little to do with diaphragms between the cars, and everything to do with the couplers and draft gear. 

One the other hand, 14 tank cars of chemical sloshing around, even at yard speeds as you try to start and stop them for spotting can kick your butt if you get them really sloshing around.

 

As an example, the smoothest steam passenger train work I've been involved with was switching directions after going through a switch.  The engineer, I was the firemen for this trip, managed to very slowly stretch out the train and throw the johnson bar over into forward so smoothly that the ride-along in the cab said "hey - are we going forward now?!"  The whole maneuver was done with almost no brake application so we didn't need to build pressure back up.  Smooth as glass and one my most pleasant memories of steam operation. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×