Skip to main content

There are many old threads on re-wiring a Williams loco in series to slow it down.  Mainly after adding a ERR sound board so it will operate with complete sounds, motive, horn, and bell, at 0r below 10 volts AC.  Can anyone answer exactly that after wiring the motors in series, that less voltage is required, and the engine will run slower so the sounds can be activated accurately.  All input is welcomed and appreciated.  Thanks in advance for your responses'... 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It should run half as fast for the same track voltage as it did with the motors in parallel. Am I missing something about the question? For the same track voltage, speed should be half and current draw should be half. These figures probably fall apart at extremely low track voltages, around 3 volts or less.

It will also be less susceptible to low voltage spots in the track by a factor of four over the stock, parallel wired locos.

When wiring in series MORE voltage is required, because each motor only gets HALF of the track voltage.

With every discussion of wiring the motors in series, someone always chimes in with "if one truck slips, the other will stop." While that is true in theory, I have never seen it happen with dozens of series-wired locos and over at least fifteen years of service. So don't worry when someone says that.

Last edited by RoyBoy

You can wire the motors in series, and you can also just use a string of series diode pairs to reduce the voltage to the motors.  While wiring in series works, there are some downsides.  One issue is that if one motor loses traction, the other truck will stall as the free spinning motor will draw much less current.  With parallel wiring, that doesn't happen.

Series diode pairs serves to drop the motor voltage while still having additional voltage to the sound board.

gunrunnerjohn posted:

You can wire the motors in series, and you can also just use a string of series diode pairs to reduce the voltage to the motors.  While wiring in series works, there are some downsides.  One issue is that if one motor loses traction, the other truck will stall as the free spinning motor will draw much less current.  With parallel wiring, that doesn't happen.

Series diode pairs serves to drop the motor voltage while still having additional voltage to the sound board.

John- do you have a sketch of how to wire the diodes, and diode size? I would try it on any future engines that I buy.

Bob

Here you go, you can use either diodes or bridge rectifiers.  Frequently, it's more convenient to use bridge rectifiers, less wiring.  Obviously, you can vary the number of diodes pairs or bridge rectifiers to achieve the proper balance between track voltage and speed of operation.

Motor Voltage Dropping Using Diodes

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Motor Voltage Dropping Using Diodes
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

Diodes vs. series wiring

One of the benefits of series wiring is that you not only lower the top speed, you double the usable range of the throttle.  Advancing the throttle enough to add 4 volts to the track only adds 2 volts to each motor in a series setup.  Once the motors start running in a diode setup, advancing the throttle 4 volts still adds 4 volts to each motor so the speed increases at the same rate as without the diodes.  Only the top speed is decreased due to the diodes.  In my opinion, series wiring is superior to diodes.

As to the supposed problem with one motor losing traction, this is really only a problem with very early Williams diesels that came without traction tires.  Virtually every other 3-rail diesel has traction tires on both trucks so losing traction with either truck is not an issue.

  What a great thread, and very pertinent to what I’m trying to accomplish.  My Williams sharknose ABA is a speed true demon with little low end pulling power (especially considering how heavy it is) and with a relatively small range of speed adjustments. Trying to run slowly, it stalls around curves at slower speeds, and then suddenly rockets down the straights at .89 mach.  My K-Line SW-1 does this too.    Does wiring in series eradicate these traits?  Is the wiring job as simple as connecting each motor’s + lead together, and doing the same with their negative leads? 

  I haven’t had the shell off of the Williams or K-Line in quite some time, anyone have photos of their wiring job?

 

Tom

 

FlyPlanes-PlayTrains posted:

Does wiring in series eradicate these traits?  Is the wiring job as simple as connecting each motor’s + lead together, and doing the same with their negative leads? 

I had this explained to me awhile back, but I haven't gotten around to doing it yet.  I believe you simply pull the + lead off of one motor, then tape it off (insulate the loose wire).  Pull the - lead off the other motor and tape it off.  Then make a new jumper wire to connect the two motors together.

I believe that's what your supposed to do, someone please correct me if this is wrong.

<>Is the wiring job as simple as connecting each motor’s + lead together, and doing the same with their negative leads? <>

Nope. That is wiring the motors in PARALLEL, which is how they are already wired from the factory. Series wiring means that the power goes through one motor, then through the other motor before going back to the PC board.

Here's how to do it.

 

Wiring motors in series:

The motors have two wires attached to them. They could be any two colors, but for purposes of this discussion, we will assume that each motor has one blue wire and one yellow wire, OK?

-take off the shell

-Follow the blue wire from one motor back to the board and snip that wire at the board.

-follow the yellow wire from the other motor back to the board and snip it off at the board.

-now you have one motor with a long unattached blue wire, one motor with a long unattached yellow wire and two wire stubs on the board.

-take the long unattached blue wire from one motor and connect it to the long yellow wire from the other motor. You can connect them with wire nuts, or solder and heat shrink.

-put some tape or heat shrink on the stubs of wire on the boards if they can touch anything.

-test drive the loco before putting the shell back on.

 That's all there is to it. Your loco will run more slowly and be less inclined to slow down in spots where the track voltage is low.

 There are other ways to handle the wires at the board, some that are more easily reversible, but this is the quickest/easiest way.

Mixed Freight's explanation is electrically the same as mine, just a different way to do it.

Last edited by RoyBoy
gunrunnerjohn posted:

You can wire the motors in series, and you can also just use a string of series diode pairs to reduce the voltage to the motors.  While wiring in series works, there are some downsides.  One issue is that if one motor loses traction, the other truck will stall as the free spinning motor will draw much less current.  With parallel wiring, that doesn't happen.

Series diode pairs serves to drop the motor voltage while still having additional voltage to the sound board.

Absolutely - but, I have a NYC 0-8-8-0, "customized" from a RK 2-8-8-2, with TAS TMCC (no cruise) and the twin motors wired in series, and I have seen this occur only once since I built it several years ago. The issue is real, but its frequency, at least on my gnarly old layout, is rare.

If it occurs a lot, the diodes are the way to go.

If it had cruise control I might not have even bothered with the series wiring.

(3RO loco; 2RO photo tool.)

DSCN2156a

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSCN2156a
Last edited by D500

Thanks for the great responses from everyone', The main point I want to accomplish is to get the ERR sound board to operate at full capacity which requires 10 Volts AC, and not have the williams loco run at high speed which it will do at 10 VAC.  

Shout out to Royboy:  Some how I inadvertently deleted the informative E-Mail you sent'.. I am so thankful that you chimed in on this thread.  I have printed your instructions.  Thanks again.

Gene H, and GRJ, thank you both for your input.  From looking at my K Line and Williams models, It appears K Line is wired similar to Lionel. WIlliams is different again from just comparatively looking. 

 

 

 

 

Well, I finally got around to hooking up my first loco's motors in series (WbB U-33C), and boy is it ever nice now!  It runs like a scale model train instead of a hyper-sonic slot car!

After studying the stock wiring, doing the series motor connection proved super easy.  For the front motor, I removed the blue wire/female crimp terminal from the plastic plug that connects to the reverse board.  Next I removed the rear motor's yellow wire/female crimp terminal from its plastic plug on the reverse board.  Then I shaped a simple tiny U-clip from a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire.  I plugged the female crimp terminals onto this tiny copper U-clip, thereby connecting the blue and yellow wires together.  Lastly, I slipped on a piece of heat shrink tubing, and applied some soldering iron heat to shrink it on.  Wah-La........ instant non-permanent electrical connection!  No cutting/stripping/splicing/soldering/wire nutting/taping of wires. And I can EASILY resort back to the factory set-up if I ever want to.  Not sure why I would want to, but that's beside the point.

Many thanks to everyone on this thread and a previous thread a few months ago for all the great explanations and diagrams.  I believe I got about 6 more WbB locos to convert, and hopefully they'll all go as quick and painless as the U-33C!  

Last edited by Mixed Freight
Mixed Freight posted:

Well, I finally got around to hooking up my first loco's motors in series (WbB U-33C), and boy is it ever nice now!  It runs like a scale model train instead of a hyper-sonic slot car!

After studying the stock wiring, doing the series motor connection proved super easy.  For the front motor, I removed the blue wire/female crimp terminal from the plastic plug that connects to the reverse board.  Next I removed the rear motor's yellow wire/female crimp terminal from its plastic plug on the reverse board.  Then I shaped a simple tiny U-clip from a piece of 18 ga. solid copper wire.  I plugged the female crimp terminals onto this tiny copper U-clip, thereby connecting the blue and yellow wires together.  Lastly, I slipped on a piece of heat shrink tubing, and applied some soldering iron heat to shrink it on.  Wah-La........ instant non-permanent electrical connection!  No cutting/stripping/splicing/soldering/wire nutting/taping of wires. And I can EASILY resort back to the factory set-up if I ever want to.  Not sure why I would want to, but that's beside the point.

Many thanks to everyone on this thread and a previous thread a few months ago for all the great explanations and diagrams.  I believe I got about 6 more WbB locos to convert, and hopefully they'll all go as quick and painless as the U-33C!  

Hey Paul, sounds like you did a great job re-wiring! I think I will try this method as well, as I don't want to cut the wires.  Can you expand on the clip you made or possibly show a photo.  I would appreciate seeing how you did that.  Thanks very much in advance'...

Quarter Gauger 48 posted:
Mixed Freight posted:

Well, I finally got around to hooking up my first loco's motors in series (WbB U-33C), and boy is it ever nice now!  It runs like a scale model train instead of a hyper-sonic slot car!

After studying the stock wiring, doing the series motor connection proved super easy.  For the front motor, I removed the blue wire/female crimp terminal from the plastic plug that connects to the reverse board.  Next I removed the rear motor's yellow wire/female crimp terminal from its plastic plug on the reverse board.  Then I shaped a simple tiny U-clip from a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire.  I plugged the female crimp terminals onto this tiny copper U-clip, thereby connecting the blue and yellow wires together.  Lastly, I slipped on a piece of heat shrink tubing, and applied some soldering iron heat to shrink it on.  Wah-La........ instant non-permanent electrical connection!  No cutting/stripping/splicing/soldering/wire nutting/taping of wires. And I can EASILY resort back to the factory set-up if I ever want to.  Not sure why I would want to, but that's beside the point.

Many thanks to everyone on this thread and a previous thread a few months ago for all the great explanations and diagrams.  I believe I got about 6 more WbB locos to convert, and hopefully they'll all go as quick and painless as the U-33C!  

Hey Paul, sounds like you did a great job re-wiring! I think I will try this method as well, as I don't want to cut the wires.  Can you expand on the clip you made or possibly show a photo.  I would appreciate seeing how you did that.  Thanks very much in advance'...

Thanks!  Glad you liked my idea.  Don't have time for pictures right now, but I may take and post some on the next loco I do.  For right now, I'll simply expand on a few items............

The "U-clip" was made from a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire (not 18 ga. as I originally posted).  If you can imagine a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire about 7/16" or 1/2" long to start, then bend into a fairly tight U-shape with needle nose pliers, that's pretty much all there is to it.  Each straight leg is about 1/8"~3/16" long minimum, and the rest is the 180* bend.  I plugged the female crimp connectors onto the legs, then slid a piece of heat shrink tubing on and shrunk it down with a hot soldering iron.  Sort of resembles two wires connected with a wire nut.

On my U33C, the front motor and the rear motor EACH plug into the reverse board with a 4-wire plug.  I simply unplugged the front motor plug from the board, then using an awl, disengaged the blue wire female crimp connector from the plug.  Then inserted the plug back into the reverse board socket.  Next I did the exact same thing for the rear motor, except of course I removed the yellow wire instead of the blue wire.  And that's it!  That's how I got the two wires loose without cutting them.

Pretty quick and easy, really.  And the way the loco runs now, it's almost like Christmas in July with a brand new loco!

Hope that helps! 

Mixed Freight posted:
Quarter Gauger 48 posted:
Mixed Freight posted:

Well, I finally got around to hooking up my first loco's motors in series (WbB U-33C), and boy is it ever nice now!  It runs like a scale model train instead of a hyper-sonic slot car!

After studying the stock wiring, doing the series motor connection proved super easy.  For the front motor, I removed the blue wire/female crimp terminal from the plastic plug that connects to the reverse board.  Next I removed the rear motor's yellow wire/female crimp terminal from its plastic plug on the reverse board.  Then I shaped a simple tiny U-clip from a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire.  I plugged the female crimp terminals onto this tiny copper U-clip, thereby connecting the blue and yellow wires together.  Lastly, I slipped on a piece of heat shrink tubing, and applied some soldering iron heat to shrink it on.  Wah-La........ instant non-permanent electrical connection!  No cutting/stripping/splicing/soldering/wire nutting/taping of wires. And I can EASILY resort back to the factory set-up if I ever want to.  Not sure why I would want to, but that's beside the point.

Many thanks to everyone on this thread and a previous thread a few months ago for all the great explanations and diagrams.  I believe I got about 6 more WbB locos to convert, and hopefully they'll all go as quick and painless as the U-33C!  

Hey Paul, sounds like you did a great job re-wiring! I think I will try this method as well, as I don't want to cut the wires.  Can you expand on the clip you made or possibly show a photo.  I would appreciate seeing how you did that.  Thanks very much in advance'...

Thanks!  Glad you liked my idea.  Don't have time for pictures right now, but I may take and post some on the next loco I do.  For right now, I'll simply expand on a few items............

The "U-clip" was made from a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire (not 18 ga. as I originally posted).  If you can imagine a piece of 16 ga. solid copper wire about 7/16" or 1/2" long to start, then bend into a fairly tight U-shape with needle nose pliers, that's pretty much all there is to it.  Each straight leg is about 1/8"~3/16" long minimum, and the rest is the 180* bend.  I plugged the female crimp connectors onto the legs, then slid a piece of heat shrink tubing on and shrunk it down with a hot soldering iron.  Sort of resembles two wires connected with a wire nut.

On my U33C, the front motor and the rear motor EACH plug into the reverse board with a 4-wire plug.  I simply unplugged the front motor plug from the board, then using an awl, disengaged the blue wire female crimp connector from the plug.  Then inserted the plug back into the reverse board socket.  Next I did the exact same thing for the rear motor, except of course I removed the yellow wire instead of the blue wire.  And that's it!  That's how I got the two wires loose without cutting them.

Pretty quick and easy, really.  And the way the loco runs now, it's almost like Christmas in July with a brand new loco!

Hope that helps! 

Thanks Paul for the amplified instructions.  I appreciate you taking the time to provide the additional information. However, the SD40 I have is configured differently that your U33-C.  So I could not do it the way you did.

I'll explain in a fresh post'...

 The final report is in: 

First, the (ERR) Electric Railroad SoundBoard, is completely outstanding. Once installed correctly, in this case a WIlliams, 2004 model, SD-40.  To obtain the best performance from the soundboard  in a Williams , the motors must be slowed down in order to provide 10 Volts AC to activate the horn, bell and all the steps of the motive power sounds.  And at the same time not have the engine run @ top speed as it will do at 10 Volts AC. 

I did plenty of research before attempting to re-wire the motors in series as required to decrease engine speed .  This particular engine is an excellent runner and puller.  So I didn't want to mess it up.  I did have a little trouble getting the soundboard to work initially .  But I switched around the power ports on the reverse board.  That solved the problem.

However, I could only get full motive sound, horn, bell, in neutral .  [Reason]  when running, it requires the 10VAC.

I must thank Royboy, for his method and instructions on re-wiring the motors in series.  I also thank Paul, [Fastfreigh], for  explaining his method as well.

This WIlliams engine now operates as well if not better than any MTH Premier , Lionel Legacy , and GGM engine.  The sound is absolutely perfect.

The engine speed, from a normal 1 SMPH start up to full speed @ full 18VAC  approximately 60 SMPH pulling  a twenty car mixed freight as smooth as silk.  You learn something every day.  I wish I had realized the the motors could be re-wired in series with little effort and the inexpensive engines would run like their rich cousins...  This was a fun project, and this Williams engine is becoming one of my favorites.  Perhaps because I have detailed, weathered, and now sound and normal speed adjustment.  I don't think I'll be removing the shell again for quite some time'...

If you've been thinking of doing this adjustment to one of your orphans, I recommend you do.  It is well worth it'..

I will post a short video tomorrow if all goes well timewise, of the engine in operation'... 

 

Last edited by Quarter Gauger 48
RoyBoy posted:

And now that you know how to do it, your roster of engines will all run better. Every one you do will be easier and bring more satisfaction. Congratulations.

Roy, you are absolutely correct.  I now have a new improved affection for this engine.  I rarely  ran it as it didn't have the excitement of the  my others with sound.  ANd the factory sound was terrible, and it ran T0000 fast.  NOW, I love it, and I think your right, as it is the satisfaction of doing it yourself..........I thank you again for your expertise'... It is very much appreciated.   Now off to find a WIlliams, FA, and a Hudson....

I had recently purchased a Williams SD-90, brand new, at a reasonable price, just to hear what the True Blast Plus sounded like. As everyone else, I was disappointed that even running with a lot of cars, you couldn't get out of the engine idle sound because of the low voltage requirement of the engine.  I followed the expert advice given on series wiring, and although I don't like messing with a brand new engine, I gave it a try.  The only thing that I did differently was to use a 20 gauge wire for the "temporary" connection, as it fit into the female plug clip a little better.  Talk about a puller, this engine pulls 30 cars without a sweat.  And most importantly, I now get the full range of engine sounds at about 9 volts, whereas before I could only put less than 4 volts on the track.  Thanks again Forum guys for the tips that helped to make this happen!

Love this Forum...

Rewired one of my Williams locos this afternoon. A PRR NW-2.

I use a KW for power and it took off like shot before. I used @Mixed Freight's method and removed the terminal ends from the plugs. I used a 16 ga fork crimp to plug the wires back into and shrink wrapped the end.

It runs much smoother now and can actually spot cars without crashing into the bumpers.

2019-10-14 15.39.322019-10-14 15.45.262019-10-14 15.49.28

Attachments

Images (3)
  • 2019-10-14 15.39.32
  • 2019-10-14 15.45.26
  • 2019-10-14 15.49.28
Videos (2)
2019-10-14 16.04.09
2019-10-14 16.04.54
RSJB18 posted:

Love this Forum...

Rewired one of my Williams locos this afternoon. A PRR NW-2.

I use a KW for power and it took off like shot before. I used @Mixed Freight's method and removed the terminal ends from the plugs. I used a 16 ga fork crimp to plug the wires back into and shrink wrapped the end.

It runs much smoother now and can actually spot cars without crashing into the bumpers.

Yeeeee Hawwwww!!!  That's the way to do it!  I have got most of my WbB fleet converted now, and they're all running great.

I noticed another benefit by doing this.  Not only does wiring the motors in series cut the voltage in half for each motor, but it also cuts the total amperage draw in half!  Leaves more power for everything else. 

I disagree about the stalling.   I have a number of locos wired in series, and if one motor stalls, the other spins the wheels.   

However, this is not a problem.    The locos pull very well, so creating a stall takes a very long train, and if that is the case, I add a second loco.  

The benefits of series wiring are just great.

 Nice work RSJB18 '  It's just amazing how much smoother they run in series'..

Dave, I've seen no need to rewire any of My MTH as they start out smooth, no jerking PS1, 2, and 3's I have'...

WB47, I think the williams assembly system is the most economical for them, and that is what keeps the cost down.  For their price point , they actually make a very decent product. And rewiring cost the consumer nothing... But perhaps a letter to them with this concern may lead to the wiring improvement.. 

wb47 posted:

Just a dumb question.  This has been a problem with Williams engines for years now.  Why doesn't  Williams redesign their product to perform to what customers want. 

Some of the K-Line powered units had a switch on the bottom so you could select parallel or series. I think it was on their interurban units.

Sure seems like a good idea.

Quarter Gauger 48 posted:

Here is a short video of the converted 'Williams SD-40 with installed ERR soundboard, and re-wired in Series'..

https://youtu.be/ivkqgro0A8k

Hang on tight'... just for fun a ride on the head end'...

https://youtu.be/lbmOYKGSD6Y

Ted, those are really nice videos. Is the Williams engine running in conventional with the sounds. Realize you did the ERR sound board, but you get those sounds in conventional operation.  Thanks for the information and videos.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×