Skip to main content

Below is a picture of the power section for my electrical setup on my in-progress layout.  There have been a couple of posts stating that the PSX needs to be installed between the transformer and the TIU to prevent DCS signal interference.  However, for my two long main lines I will be running more than 10 amps and I have the TIUs wired in passive mode.

 

The PSX will be wired on the transformer side of the TIU lead connections.  Since the DCS signal is already applied to the wire, does anyone know if this will interfere with the DCS signal to the track?

 

Thanks.

 

Ron

PSX-AC Install Graphic

PS:  The note within the PSX symbol (gray dot) should be amps, not volts. 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • PSX-AC Install Graphic
Last edited by CAPPilot
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Barry,

 

You asked this once before, back on May 16, 2012.  I went back to that post and you were never given an answer, although a link was provided.

 

Basically, a PSX-AC is an incredibly fast acting electronic circuit breaker with TVS built-in, and an auto or manual reset.  It has other functions, but the CB function is what I'm going to use it for.  I will have it set at 15.4 amps for this installation.

 

The problem is the PSX has been shown to cause interference with the DCS signal when installed after the TIU, so the recommended location is between the transformer and TIU.  I do not know how the DCS signal works, so that is why I'm asking about using it with DCS in passive mode where the TIU electronics are not between the transformer and track.  Will the signal still be affected with my setup, where the TIU is attached after the PSX?

 

Ron

Last edited by CAPPilot

Ron,

 

In regards to placement of anything resembling a circuit breaker, the closer to the source of power (the transformer) the better. The TVS function is already built-into each TIU channel.

 

The only concern I would have regarding use of these devices at all is that if they do things similar to what the Lionel device that has active circuit protection does (the name of the device escapes me at the moment), it may degrade the DCS signal, as the Lionel device has been reported to do.

Thanks, Barry.

 

I don't know how a signal in a wire works.  I was hoping that connecting the TIU leads to the power wires between the PSX and the track would mean the signal had a clear path to the engines.  I'm concerned that the signal, when it goes the other way towards the PSX, will be reflected back and cause interference.  I'm not sure if this would happen. 

 

Another option would be to put the PSX between the PH180 transformer and the TPC400.  I don't think it matters where the PSX is to work, since it will trip faster than either the PH or TPC.

 

I guess I should just hook it up and see what happens.

 

Ron

GGG,

 

The variable channels are the ones set up with passive wiring.  They will provide the DCS signal for the main lines, which will be powered with more than the 10 amps the TIU can handle.  Power for the main lines with go from two PH180s to the TPC400 to the PSX and then to the mainline terminal blocks.  The output side only of the variable channels will connect to the power wires between the PSX and the terminal block.

 

I'm using normal TIU wiring for the yard and terminal tracks.  Since I don't need much power to those tracks, I'm using just one PH and TPC to power both fixed channels.

 

My question is, will the PSX somehow interfere with the DCS signal to the track since it is not between the direct line from the TIU to the track?  Could the DCS signal reflect off the PSX and go back down the wire to the track.  I have no idea, and I guess nobody else does either.

 

When I get the chance, I'll set it up on my test bench and see what happens.

 

Ron

John,

 

THANK YOU!  I assume the choke would go between the PSX and where the wires from the TIU connect.  I am going to see if my diagram above works just for grins, but I'm going to add these chokes to ensure no problems in the final installation.

 

It would probably be a lot easier to just replace all the K-line StreamLighting in my passenger cars with LEDs to reduce my power requirement, but I've already added the additional wire on the pick-up rollers so I think I'll continue as is.  I'll go LEDs as the StreamLighting fails.

 

Now to order those chokes.

 

Ron

Last edited by CAPPilot
Originally Posted by CAPPilot:

John,

 

THANK YOU!  I assume the choke would go between the PSX and where the wires from the TIU connect.  I am going to see if my diagram above works just for grins, but I'm going to add these chokes to ensure no problems in the final installation.

 

It would probably be a lot easier to just replace all the K-line StreamLighting in my passenger cars with LEDs to reduce my power requirement, but I've already added the additional wire on the pick-up rollers so I think I'll continue as is.  I'll go LEDs as the StreamLighting fails.

 

Now to order those chokes.

 

Ron

The chokes go after all the other stuff right before the track connection.  The TIU outputs would be connected, separately directly to the track.  The chokes will simply isolate the PSX and TPU from the DCS signal on the track.

John,

 

I think I can replace "track" with "terminal block" in your post.  (Unless you are saying the DCS signal wires should be entirely separate with their own terminal block.)

 

Here is my updated schematic.  The wires from the TIU variable outputs will be attached directly to the 24 port terminal block. 

 

Hopefully I got it right this time.  Again, thank you.

 

Ron

 

Slide1

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Slide1

CaPPilot,

   The premise for needing to exceed a 10 Amp Breaker safety on your larger loops is incorrect however, wired correctly in blocks there is no need to exceed the 10 Amps  breaker safety on your layout, we proved this on my 5 level FasTrack layout years ago.  Use the 10 - 12 join method for drops, this means you can have many many 3 foot track sections in just one block, and your 10 Amp breakers will work just fine.  I know because this is how I actually wired my FasTrack layout, however engineering in this manner, some magic lights are required to portray the DCS signal at nearly all 10's.  Engineering wise IMO there is no need for running your layout in passive mode with your TIU.  Remember your 10 Amp breakers are just a safety that safe guards your TIU.  If needed you can use seperate transformer power, as I did, to power your switches & other equipment.

PCRR/Dave

 

15 Big Silver PRR lighted Passenger Cars pulled by a P2 GG1 over several different blocks, safe guarded by the Scott 10 Amp breakers in front of the TIU. - Worked great.

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Pine Creek Railroad

OK, I'll allow that it wasn't crystal clear, but I'm pretty sure he's talking about power districts.

 

FWIW, I've tried paralleled PH180's when we had issues with power on our modular club layout.  I didn't like it, and I don't intend to go back.  20A seems to be able to do a LOT more welding than 10A when you have a derailment.  Usually, only one PH180 breaker would trip and leave power cooking away.

 

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

FWIW, I've tried paralleled PH180's when we had issues with power on our modular club layout.  I didn't like it, and I don't intend to go back.  20A seems to be able to do a LOT more welding than 10A when you have a derailment.  Usually, only one PH180 breaker would trip and leave power cooking away.

 

John,

 

I went back and forth on whether to use the TIU and two PHs as in the schematic above, or go the power district approach which has been discussed on the forum before.  My concern with the power districts is I need more than 10 amps for just one train (three powered engines with all sound and 10 plus passenger cars with non-LED lighting).  The introduction of the incredibly fast PSX helped me decide to go with my current approach.  The PSX will be set at 15.4 amps, which should meet my requirements.  On my old layout, my 8+ car passenger trains pushed the 10 amp limit of the PH, so 15 amps will work.  Plus, I will not need the circuit protection in the PH or TPC because of the capabilities of the PSX.  I will not have the only one PH breaker working issue you had.

 

Ron

gunrunnerjohn posted:

I know that the TMCC Direct Lockon kills the DCS signal, so testing that will be a very good idea.

 

You can, of course, simply put some high-current 22uh chokes in the lines to the mains and that will preclude any issue of it interfering with the DCS.  That's the up side of going passive.

 

Here's a 34A 22uh Choke that should do the trick.

 

Thanks to all for this informative thread, especially Gunrunnerjohn and CAPPilot.

As an update, it appears that the link for this choke doesn't go to this product as DigiKey has discontinued the item.  It is, however, available at Mouser as Mouser Part No. 858-HA55L-3623220LF. 

Peter Gentieu

Gregg,

Why not run all channels in passive mode?

As you well know, just the usual 2 reasons:

  • Loss of the E-Stop capability
  • Inability to operate the variable channels in variable mode.

The first is easily circumvented via a wireless AC remote pushbutton on a lanyard and the second is only important if you operate conventional engines using the DCS Remote.

Last edited by Barry Broskowitz

FYI: here is my latest power setup for the two mainline tracks where I want more than 10 amps to the track.  I control conventional engines through the TPC400.  By time I get the layout up and running, I hope Lionel will have delivered the Legacy PowerMaster 360 to replace the TPCs.  I will still depend on the PSX-AC for circuit protection (set at 15.8 amps).

2PH180-TPC-PSX-TIU

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2PH180-TPC-PSX-TIU
Last edited by CAPPilot

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×