Skip to main content

Found this in my Dad's stuff, don't know what it's from.

 

First can anyone tell me what locomotive this came out of?

 

Second, it runs but squeals loudly and slows down when it squeals, on and off but consistent when running around the track, I've heard that sound before but can't remember what caused it.  Any help on this would be appreciated.

 

Thanks again 

 

Bum

DSC06032

DSC06033

DSC06036

Attachments

Images (3)
  • DSC06032
  • DSC06033
  • DSC06036
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The squealing is probably coming from the armature bearing shown in your top photo.

It may take several light applications of oil to quiet it.

If it is still squealing after several light applications of oil, or if the squeal keeps returning after a short while then the bearing may need to be replaced.

 

The motor looks like it would fit a 2018 style steam engine.

 

 

bum,

Here's a list of Lionel Post War steam locomotives and tenders, which is what your motor is from.

The column to the right shows the wheel arrangements and when you click on the locomotive road numbers, in the left column, a color photo of the locomotive will appear and you will have to search further for the various tenders to appear, so you can have an idea of the locomotives which your motor comes from.

http://www.postwarlionel.com/steam.html

Ralph

Last edited by RJL
Bum,
 
The motor is a 2026-100 motor, used in the 2016, 208 and the 2925 (1951). Get your pen oiler out and put a drop of oil on the armature shaft at both the brush plate and at the gear plate (opposite side from the brush plate). Now put a drop of oil on the axles at the bearings under the collector shoe. You should be good to go. Tough little motors.
 
Dennis
 
Originally Posted by bum:

Found this in my Dad's stuff, don't know what it's from.

 

First can anyone tell me what locomotive this came out of?

 

Second, it runs but squeals loudly and slows down when it squeals, on and off but consistent when running around the track, I've heard that sound before but can't remember what caused it.  Any help on this would be appreciated.

 

Thanks again 

 

Bum

DSC06032

DSC06033

DSC06036

 

You also need to oil the axle bearings and the idler gear bearings (2).  As far as replacing brushes, the loco shows very little usage as the pick up rollers are not worn, so it is unlikely that the brushes are worn out.  You should use ordinary motor oil to lube things as it never dries out or becomes gummy.  

 

To create controversy, I oil the commutators and brushes of my locos using motor oil.  I have done this for several years with no problems.  The motor friction is lower when the commutator is oiled as most of the motor friction is due to the brushes.

Seriously?
 
 
Originally Posted by servoguy:

You also need to oil the axle bearings and the idler gear bearings (2).  As far as replacing brushes, the loco shows very little usage as the pick up rollers are not worn, so it is unlikely that the brushes are worn out.  You should use ordinary motor oil to lube things as it never dries out or becomes gummy.  

 

To create controversy, I oil the commutators and brushes of my locos using motor oil.  I have done this for several years with no problems.  The motor friction is lower when the commutator is oiled as most of the motor friction is due to the brushes.

 

 

quote:
To create controversy, I oil the commutators and brushes of my locos using motor oil.  I have done this for several years with no problems.  The motor friction is lower when the commutator is oiled as most of the motor friction is due to the brushes.



 

I don't. Quality modern brushes are self lubricating.

While I have seen a few published recommendations to lubricate the commutator of small electric motors (such as those found in trains), most published materials advise against it.
One of the most common service issues on the Lionel train motors I have serviced are oil soaked brushes.

Last edited by C W Burfle

I think it depends on the oil used.  I use motor oil, and have done it for about 7 years with no problem.  I have a 2353 that has had the brushes oiled for about 5 years with no problem.  The oil does not block the electricity and if it did, you couldn't oil the driver axles or the pickup rollers.  

 

BTW, I don't believe everything Lionel says.  Lionel Lube is terrible for lubricating a loco as it gets hard.

You say no problem, but I'm willing to bet that your oil job is doing far more damage than good, and Mersen, one of the worlds largest brush manufacturers tends to agree. Oil will cause the surface of the commutator, brushes and brush plate to foul prematurely. Sure, it may run, but it will not run nearly as well as a properly prepared motor. How do I know, we rebuild more than 500 Lionel motors of all types every year. You'll get far more mileage from your motors by caring for them properly.
 
Proper commutator roughness will give the carbon brush an adequate seating base and will ensure a good current transmission. Commutator surfaces must be neither too smooth (glossy), nor too rough to enable optimal carbon brush performance. High mica content in the commutator material often creates serious problems for brushes. Commutators therefore have to be carefully checked to ensure the absence of burrs along the bar edges (separation lines) and should be properly chamfered. It is also a good idea to check that the commutator run out (wobble or warp) does not exceed acceptable limits of +/- .005. Carbon brush friction coefficient has to be low and stable over time to allow the carbon brush to work without overheating, but you don't achieve that by lubricating the brush with oil. By adding oil you are reducing friction, but increating amperage draw through the brush, brush spring and brush holder. Add to this the fact that the oil will trap contaminants that would normally fall away. You would be better served by making certain that the face of the commutator is perfectly perpendicular to the armature shaft and that the bearings of the motor are within tolerance. This eliminates vibration and unnecessary friction. You may want to steer away from the repro brushes and buy good carbon brushes with 5 or 10 percent copper. This softens the brush, aids conductivity and reduces wear and tear on the commutator. When you change brushes, change the brush springs. The spring pressure shoud be equal for both brushes, and you achieve that by (A) buying good stainless steel springs instead of the cheap repros and (B) matching the springs, one atop of the other to ensure their shapes, and thus the pressure, are the same.
 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by servoguy:

I think it depends on the oil used.  I use motor oil, and have done it for about 7 years with no problem.  I have a 2353 that has had the brushes oiled for about 5 years with no problem.  The oil does not block the electricity and if it did, you couldn't oil the driver axles or the pickup rollers.  

 

BTW, I don't believe everything Lionel says.  Lionel Lube is terrible for lubricating a loco as it gets hard.

 

I have been running trains for 63 years.  I have never replaced a brush, and I have some locos with many hours on them.  My 2353 wore out the pickup rollers and I had to replace them.  All of my locos run well, and some of them will run at about 7 volts on the track.  This is a clear indication of low current draw by the motor.  

 

Carbon brushes are impregnated with oil.  This was done soon after the invention of the brush type DC motor because the brushes were wearing very fast until the oil was added.  After the brushes are impregnated, they are heated to drive off the light ends of the oil.  

 

BTW, I am not going to put a dial indicator on the motor commutators.  Too much work.  I have about 100 locos, and I don't want to make my toy trains into a lot of work.  0.005" runout is pretty big, and is quite visible to the eye, so I think my eyeball check is good enough.  Sometimes, but not often, I will polish a commutator with a ScotchBrite pad, and that seems to work just fine.

 

BTW #2.  I am an electrical engineer and have 51 years of experience doing very high tech stuff for the military.

I appreciate your position as an electrical engineer, and with that hate to burst your bubble, but the brushes used in toy trans are not impregnated with oil. They are made of 94% powdered graphite, 5% pure carbon and 1% PTFE powder and formed under high pressure.
 
 
Originally Posted by servoguy:

I have been running trains for 63 years.  I have never replaced a brush, and I have some locos with many hours on them.  My 2353 wore out the pickup rollers and I had to replace them.  All of my locos run well, and some of them will run at about 7 volts on the track.  This is a clear indication of low current draw by the motor.  

 

Carbon brushes are impregnated with oil.  This was done soon after the invention of the brush type DC motor because the brushes were wearing very fast until the oil was added.  After the brushes are impregnated, they are heated to drive off the light ends of the oil.  

 

BTW, I am not going to put a dial indicator on the motor commutators.  Too much work.  I have about 100 locos, and I don't want to make my toy trains into a lot of work.  0.005" runout is pretty big, and is quite visible to the eye, so I think my eyeball check is good enough.  Sometimes, but not often, I will polish a commutator with a ScotchBrite pad, and that seems to work just fine.

 

BTW #2.  I am an electrical engineer and have 51 years of experience doing very high tech stuff for the military.

 

The oldest loco I have is a 152 made about 1925.  If I remember correctly, the brushes have copper in them.  The newer brushes don't appear to have copper in them.  If they don't have oil in them, that is a good reason to oil them.  Why don't you oil the commutator of one loco and test it and see what happens?  

 

My engineering experience has taught me not to believe anything until I either test it myself and/or get valid test data.  About a year ago, I restored 3 XYY analog plotters that I use with a piece of test equipment to record gain and phase vs. log frequency when I am making measurements on a servo.  I have had these plotters for about 30 years.  They were made in 1963.  I used motor oil to clean the linear pots that feed position back to the servo amplifiers.  Nothing I have used in the past worked as well as the motor oil.  This is not conventional wisdom.  I tested the plotters over several months, and they always worked very well.

Indeed, your little 152 motor does have copper based brushes. Those brushes are made of common gauze impregnated with copper powder and resin and shaped under pressure at 400 degrees. As far as oiling brushes is concerned, let's just agree to disagree. I appreciate your tinkering in order to find what you perceive as a better way, but I would rather rely on the science developed by the 3 leading brush manufacturers. I can't speak to your plotters or servos and I have never worked on them, but I have worked on thousands of open frame fractional horsepower motors and I do know what makes them work. Petroleum based products have their place, but it just happens to be not between a brush and the commutator. If it works for you, fine - whatever makes your day.
 
 
 
Originally Posted by servoguy:

The oldest loco I have is a 152 made about 1925.  If I remember correctly, the brushes have copper in them.  The newer brushes don't appear to have copper in them.  If they don't have oil in them, that is a good reason to oil them.  Why don't you oil the commutator of one loco and test it and see what happens?  

 

My engineering experience has taught me not to believe anything until I either test it myself and/or get valid test data.  About a year ago, I restored 3 XYY analog plotters that I use with a piece of test equipment to record gain and phase vs. log frequency when I am making measurements on a servo.  I have had these plotters for about 30 years.  They were made in 1963.  I used motor oil to clean the linear pots that feed position back to the servo amplifiers.  Nothing I have used in the past worked as well as the motor oil.  This is not conventional wisdom.  I tested the plotters over several months, and they always worked very well.

 

Last edited by DennisWaldron

For someone who cleans with military precision and care, oil may act to preserve and lube some brushes, plastic, and metal. But as oil penetrates and separates as it cleans, many substrates could be damaged with short or long term exposure to it. Im not an engineer, but have worked with many brushed motors from toy size to 20hp. Graphite is a great lube and conducts great too. And a graphite brush, I would imagine, would not last near half its expected motor life wet with oil fouling it. Oil also collects dirt before it can fall away by gravity or be thrown by centrifugal force and/or air currents. Catching graphite brush dust in the slots between the contact plates can cause lots of "fun" surprises. Acting like an invisible cold solder, off/on/voltage and/or amperage bouncing etc..  Heat, sparks, and oil bring about another issue, very doubtful on small stuff, but in theory possible,... fire! "Gunk" around the brushes can promote sticking, leading to poor contact, stray arcs, etc. Fire happens in big neglected motors with oil-well type bearings on occasion.  

 Dry brushes, and contacts for me. Oil is for penetrating/creeping between bearing like surfaces. Lube for "fling" prevention, high pressure, and high-heat viscosity stability. Excess oil always is avoided and/or re-cleaned quickly if badly applied.  




quote:
You may want to steer away from the repro brushes and buy good carbon brushes with 5 or 10 percent copper. This softens the brush, aids conductivity and reduces wear and tear on the commutator.




 

The 622 style brushes I like the best are some that I purchased from Madison Hardware when it was still in NYC. These brushes appear to be the ones MPC was using for a while. They have a copper tinge to them, a chamfer on one end, and no slot. They are very soft, and do wear quickly.

 

As far as reproduction / replacement brushes go:

 

I certainly have noticed a difference in quality over the years. Quite a few years ago I purchased an assortment of brushes from a parts dealer when they weren't all that easy to obtain (or so I thought). Those brushes were hard and brittle, so I never used any of them.

The replacement brushes I've purchased more recently do seem to be ok, with more of a silvery appearance, rather then being black or grey.
What brushes do you recommend?

CW: That silvery appearance is from the PTFE in the mix. I'm trying to source brushes with some copper in the mix. Lou had tubs of them at Madison, I just need to find out where they went.
 
 
Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

quote:
You may want to steer away from the repro brushes and buy good carbon brushes with 5 or 10 percent copper. This softens the brush, aids conductivity and reduces wear and tear on the commutator.


 

The 622 style brushes I like the best are some that I purchased from Madison Hardware when it was still in NYC. These brushes appear to be the ones MPC was using for a while. They have a copper tinge to them, a chamfer on one end, and no slot. They are very soft, and do wear quickly.

 

As far as reproduction / replacement brushes go:

 

I certainly have noticed a difference in quality over the years. Quite a few years ago I purchased an assortment of brushes from a parts dealer when they weren't all that easy to obtain (or so I thought). Those brushes were hard and brittle, so I never used any of them.

The replacement brushes I've purchased more recently do seem to be ok, with more of a silvery appearance, rather then being black or grey.
What brushes do you recommend?

 

 

quote:
Lou had tubs of them at Madison, I just need to find out where they went.



 

After the Madison auction I purchased a bag full of 1001M-46 brushes and 1001M-47 springs from Town and Country Hobbies. They have a coppery appearance, and look like they are probably original factory parts. He also had some of those coppery colored brushes I previously mentioned. I took a look at mine to get the part number (8040-150). A lot of those brushes are slotted to catch the spring so they don't rotate.

 

So, are the silvery brushes made with PTFE OK?

They seem soft and slippery.

 
Last edited by C W Burfle

I think the confusion about oiling brushes and commutators stems from lack of data on which oils have been used.  Some months ago, one of the guys on one of the forums said he had trouble with oil on the brushes, but he didn't specify which oil.  I am sure that if a person were to oil his brushes and commutator with 3 in 1 oil, light machine oil, sewing machine oil, or anything but motor oil, he would get a bad result as the oil would evaporate very quickly and leave a gummy mess.  Frankly, I am a little surprised that the motor oil works so well.  I am going to continue to use it, and in 5-10 years we will have another discussion about oiling the brushes and commutator.

CW, they will work just fine!
 
 
Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

 

quote:
Lou had tubs of them at Madison, I just need to find out where they went.



 

After the Madison auction I purchased a bag full of 1001M-46 brushes and 1001M-47 springs from Town and Country Hobbies. They have a coppery appearance, and look like they are probably original factory parts. He also had some of those coppery colored brushes I previously mentioned. I took a look at mine to get the part number (8040-150). A lot of those brushes are slotted to catch the spring so they don't rotate.

 

So, are the silvery brushes made with PTFE OK?

They seem soft and slippery.

 

 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×