Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by laming:

Collisions with fire is a severe risk to the innocent train crew. Has anyone heard if the crew is okay?

 

Yes they where OK, according to reports over on Train Orders. Apparently the Conductor & Engineer thought VERY FAST, and uncoupled the two units once the saw the fire, and got way away from the train, fire, and subsequent massive explosion.

Originally Posted by AGHRMatt:

Two questions:

  1. In California, if you approach a non-signaled grade crossing and can't see for 400 feet in either direction you're required to stop. Does Maryland have a similar requirement? From the film it was pretty obvious that visibility down the tracks was severely limited.
  2. Did the driver survive? Looks like a no in that situation.

Last I heard the truck driver (and owner of the company) was injured and in the hospital.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by AGHRMatt:

From the film it was pretty obvious that visibility down the tracks was severely limited.

And that is exactly what I saw!

 

A number of years ago on our line, NS cut back the brush and trees from road crossing to give more visibility to motorists. They also placed STOP signs at all private road crossings.

 

As a motorist, this same type of situation pops up numerous times along our roadways. Ornamental bushes, trees and even road signs are placed at corner intersections blocking the view of oncoming vehicles making intersections unsafe.

Regardless of the visibility up and down the tracks (which cannot truly be determined from the video due to the angle and distance), the truck driver, operating on a private and unmarked access road, bears full responsibility for assuring--or failing to do so in this case--that it was safe to cross the tracks.  I doubt anyone can disagree with that.

 First car I ever struck,one of the things the lawyers argued was an obstruction in the way of the motorist involved,but the stop sign he failed to observe was after the so-called obstruction.

 The ballast pile they were referring to was well in the clear of the right-a-way and and on railroad property.

Originally Posted by Allan Miller:

Regardless of the visibility up and down the tracks (which cannot truly be determined from the video due to the angle and distance), the truck driver, operating on a private and unmarked access road, bears full responsibility for assuring--or failing to do so in this case--that it was safe to cross the tracks.  I doubt anyone can disagree with that.

I agree 100%....but the public's knowledge of the dynamics around railroading is so lacking it's scary. (see above) Many folks, even 'professionals'  think a train is just a big truck and if needed they can hit the brakes and stop much like an 18 wheeler. If you check YouTube videos of crossing incidents, they are not accidents, you see people comment 'why didn't the train stop' as if it's a car. 99.9% of us here have a basic understanding, and respect, for the largest moving obects on earth.

The largest moving objects on dry land, anyhow. If you think people are disrespectful of trains, you should see some of the hijinks people pull in small boats running in front of big tows on the river. The Coast Guard even had a couple of their small boats come out the week before last to demonstrate how scary it is.

 

It all comes down to this: mass in motion does not stop on a dime, but most people do not understand that.

--Becky

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×