Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

Henry has been around forever.  Good company.  Nice looking rifle. But $1020 for a rim-fitre 22 is a bit steep.  I can get a nice Premier or Legacy engine for that, and I would certainly use that more often.  

 

Still, it is a very good looking rifle.

Agree... Very nice, but that's some serious coin for a 22. Especially for one that I may not want to fire very often.

Originally Posted by yankspride4:
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

Henry has been around forever.  Good company.  Nice looking rifle. But $1020 for a rim-fitre 22 is a bit steep.  I can get a nice Premier or Legacy engine for that, and I would certainly use that more often.  

 

Still, it is a very good looking rifle.

Agree... Very nice, but that's some serious coin for a 22. Especially for one that I may not want to fire very often.

Shoot it, no way, has to be kept unfired to preserve the collector value. 

My dad was an outdoorsman/hunter/fisherman/gun trader, and I went through a gun

phase in my too long a list of hobbies (boy, did they get expensive!), reading the mags, etc. and while I was well aware of Henry "yellowboys" in the Civil War and on the frontier, I only fairly recently saw the brand offered again on firearms?  In the shadows and not advertised?  I just thought the brand had been dormant, and was revived.

Originally Posted by SantaFeJim:
Henry ia fine American company that has been around a good long time.

BTW dollar-for-dollar they produce a great product.

I agree. My wife wanted a plinking rifle and she liked the 'feel' of a lever action, so I got her one in .22LR and mounted a scope on it (I know, blasphemy, but that's what she wanted). It's a real nail driver now and is crazy accurate.

Originally Posted by Bob Severin:

I don't know, but buying a $1000 rifle, just to hang up or put away for future value, is like, well, not running trains because they're NIB.

It's exactly like that.

And makes about as much sense.

The engraving is not that big a deal, it's done with a laser probably. I know someone with one of those machines and could carve up a stock with any line art you feed into it.

This is the firearm version of a collector plate...

As for me, I also rather would have stuff that I can take out and use if I want:

Let's not turn this into a "I have lots of guns" thread. It's about the just-announced Henry commemorative rifle paying tribute to American railroads. I have two Henry's now, and will be getting this one (and it will be used, not just hung on a wall). They make great firearms and the firm has a great team of people involved with it. !00% American made...every component.

Originally Posted by p51:
It's exactly like that.

And makes about as much sense.

The engraving is not that big a deal, it's done with a laser probably. 

 

although the stock is done by laser, the receiver is done by hand and IT IS a big deal. hand engraving is a lost art. I have had a couple hand engraved pieces and it well exceeded the price of the gun. 

For those concerned about the couple of images of possibly foreign locomotives/trains pictured on their info main page for this rifle, be advised that I have already contacted Anthony Imperato, president and CEO of Henry firearms, about replacing those images with a couple of "true" American locomotives. Perhaps the NP 765 and an early 4-4-0 or even Amtrak Acela or some such. Awaiting a reply from the good folks at Henry (they are VERY good at quickly responding to their customers and Facebook followers).

 

Those interested in the history of the firm can click here.

Last edited by Allan Miller

Re some of the pictures of firearms and comments about ownership...

Considering the recent thefts of trains, the risks of bragging about your stuff on a public forum, and the fact that firearms are way more desirable to the criminal element than trains, is posting the pictures and/or talking about what you have a good idea?

 

That said, it was fun looking.

Last edited by Mallard4468

Okay...I read the history of Henry...which only addresses the common knowledge stuff

of the Civil War and the frontier..Custer, etc., whose troops, I think, were mostly armed with single shot rolling block .45-70's (which means that somebody in Washington didn't learn anything from Henrys or Spencers in the Civil War).  (Give

thanks our military now works to stay ahead in technology, with less effort devoted

to frugality with ammunition, and more to survival of our combatants) I used to read

a lot of gun mags and I remember nothing about Henry in any of them until just a

few years ago.  What were they doing between 1880? and maybe 1990, if not later?

With regard to the $1K price of this version, I remember going into my local small

town hardware when just out of school and buying a nice little Stevens auto .22

for maybe $39.95 and carrying it home on foot for several blocks.  Can you imagine

doing that in today's berserk society?

Very neat gun. I'm not a big fan of commemoratives like this one myself, but I did buy one of their Golden Boys soon after they came out. My kids and I have sent untold numbers of tin cans to their graves with it. A few minor corrections, though. The original Henry was indeed connected to Winchester. It was manufactured by the New Haven Arms Co., with Oliver Winchester being the majority partner. He changed the company's name to Winchester after the Civil War. The company making this gun, is not an old company at all, and has no connection to the one which built the origional Henry. They just aquired the rights to use the name. Going off a bit further on a tangent the company's owner claimed he will build his firearms in the USA or not at all!

Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by colorado hirailer:

Well, I am no fan of "created collectibles", and there are plenty of those in toy/model

trains.  Not the forum to ask it in, but is today's Henry a direct line from those not

enough Yankees had in the Civil War, or is today's company a reincarnation?

No, it's not the same firm.  The rifles they make are OK, but receivers in the .22's are nothing to shout about metallurgically, and the wood is sort of non-descript.  I have a regular .22 that shoot everything but magnums , and also the .22 magnum, they shoot fine, but they are pricey.  Who would think a city like NYC would have a gun maker in Brooklyn?

Henry has been around forever.

 

Define forever. 

 

Unless forever was some time in the 1990s these guys have not been around forever.

 

From Wikipedia:

 

Despite advertising which seemingly encourages the misconception, the Henry Repeating Arms Company has no actual association with either the New Haven Arms Company, which manufactured the original Henry rifles and was later renamed the Winchester Repeating Arms Company in 1866, or to Benjamin Tyler Henry, its inventor. The company resurrected the Henry name in 1996[1] and started manufacturing rifles in Brooklyn, New York.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Repeating_Arms

 

 

 Perhaps they have a bridge for sale too. 

 

 

Last edited by Ted Hikel

Here is an excerpt from an article about where Henry rifles are manufactured.  Plants in New Jersey and Wisconsin.  Nothing about a plant in New York

 

*******Start of excerpt****************

Henry Repeating Arms has been operating in Wisconsin since 2006 at their 138,000 square-foot Rice Lake facility. Henry has steadily increased the number of employees there from 17 to over 100 and continues to hire as they grow. The two plants combined now employ over 300 people.

 

It is at Rice Lake that Henry made parts to supply their main plant in Bayonne, New Jersey. Starting in 2014, Henry will manufacture complete centerfire rifles in Wisconsin, expanding their capacity to satisfy gun orders.

 

*****End of excerpt********

 

 

No link, just google or yahoo search "Henry Firearms plant locations."

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×