Skip to main content

I entered Santa Fe Engine Service as a Fireman at San Bernardino, on June 11, 1970, was promoted to Engineer on the old system (full written examinations on operating rules, air brake rules, and mechanical rules, followed by oral examinations, with no simulator) in 1973, and was promoted to Road Foreman of Engines on June 1, 1984.  I could not have hired out at a better time.  All but about 10 of the Engineers senior to me were steam men, most of whom gladly shared their tricks of the trade.  These days, an Engineer has to do everything by the book, following a process.  Event recorders monitor almost everything, and upload it to a data base constantly, by radio.  When I was an Engineer, we had a mechanical speed recorder on the engine, with a stylus and a paper tape -- not much on-board surveillance.

Leaving a terminal, there was a round sign bearing the word "ZERO" (the zero board), followed by similar signs at intervals, identifying the distance every 100 feet from the zero board.  When the waycar passed the zero board, the Conductor would callout "Zero board" on the radio and the Engineer would give him a train length.  Then the Conductor called the Telegraph Office and gave the departing "soup ticket":  number of loads, number of empties, and train length.  The crew and the Dispatcher had to know the length in order to know which sidings the train would fit in.

When I passed the zero board on the engine, I started counting communication poles, and mentally noted the number to the place where the Conductor called out the zero board.  That way, I would know where the rear of the train was, when coming out of a curve or other slow order, and could already have the engines working hard when the Conductor called out "green board" (at the end of a permanent or temporary speed restriction) or "round the curve" leaving a restricted curve.  This was also useful if leaving a siding or taking a crossover between Main Tracks.

On an ascending mountain grade where the train would be making about 15 MPH with the throttle in Run-8, there were places where wheel slippage could occur, particularly on curves or passing over flange oilers.  The draft force on the couplers had to be kept constant, as fluctuating force could cause a knuckle or drawbar with stress cracks to fail.  Then you would be on a steep grade, with your train in two parts, having to delicately couple it back together, stretch it, pump up the air, and begin moving under really bad conditions where more wheel slippage could easily occur.  When entering a location where wheel slippage was likely, I applied sand and 2-3 psi of engine brakes with the throttle still wide open.  Having the brake shoes just barely against the wheels would wipe the tread clean with every revolution, and slightly warm the wheel.  Clean wheels hold the rail better than dirty ones and I'm not a physicist, but that slight difference in wheel temperature seemed to be helpful, especially in cold or wet conditions.

With a troublesome locomotive consist on a heavy grade, even more had to be done.  When one of the engines was slipping on straight track, I would go back and use the traction motor cutout out switch on that unit to cut out one motor (on engines with 4-wheel trucks) or a pair of motors (on an engine with 6-wheel trucks).  This would reduce the horsepower of that unit and usually stopped the slipping.  I would rather let the speed drop 1 or 2 MPH, instead of fighting that bear all the way to Summit and risking a broken knuckle.  

Sullivan's Curve, a famous photo location in Cajon Pass, was one of the places where fighting wheel slippage was critical, as was the last curve coming into Summit on the old alignment.  They were 10-degree curves on 2.2% ascending grades, and each had a flange oiler.  If some wheel slip occurred even with a little engine brake applied, then reducing to Run-7 would usually do the trick, but the train would lose about 2 MPH.  Then it could be tricky when deciding to advance the throttle to Run-8 again.  You had to watch the speedometer for micro-increases in speed, on order to decide that enough of the train was coming off of the curve to enable safely increasing the draft force by going to Run-8.  And, if there was not 2-3 PSI of engine brake in use, I would apply it and keep it in effect until I had gained at least 1 MPH, at which time it could be released.  I would rather go all the way to the summit with the train in one piece with a couple of speed reductions to 13 MPH if that was necessary.  Sometimes a locomotive would have a speed recorder cable that needed more lubrication, in which case, the speed indicator needle would bounce at speeds of 15 MPH or below, in which case, you just had to pay very close attention to the performance of the engine consist and feel your way through critical locations.

Another way to avoid breaking in two, was to keep the speed constant after the engine began to crest a heavy grade, by reducing throttle, unltil half the length of the train had reached the crest (by counting communication poles).  There were a lot of knuckles replaced at the crest of heavy grades.

None of these procedures were in the Air Brake and Train Handling rules, which were written by the Mechanical Department and that department was only interested in its budget for equipment maintenance.  Many of their train handling rules were completely impractical in real use, and, if applied, would have made for slow trips across the railroad with more in-train slack.  I will forever be grateful to those steam men for showing me these, and many other, unauthorized methods of getting a train over the road.  They were real Engineers who ran steam engines with varying conditions, completely manually operated, and with no speed indicators, and they really did know things.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I remember a lot of that, forgot a lot too, but I've been retired since 2010. We had a lot of hills and curves west of Topeka on the old 1st district., between there and Emporia where we came back out on the Emporia Sub. We handled a lot of coal trains off the UP interchange at Topeka, and quite a bit of grain. There was always a flange oiler at the curves that would splatter grease all over the top of the rail, so you had to have the sanders on the whole consist for several car lengths., kinda depending on whether you were following another train, or one from the opposite direction left residue on the rails from greasy wheels for some distance. We used GE's a lot on the coal trains, and it was kinda nice to have that notch 7 switch, where you could use that to reduce amperage a little on the leader, keeping the rest of the consist in 8., until conditions improved. There was a place near Carbondale where they wanted us to reduce the consist to notch 7 cresting a stiff grade around MP 65, but if everything was running right, holding the rail, not slipping, we usually didn't'. I tried to comply a time or two, and nearly stalled. Let's say I was at 1200 amps at ten mph or so, If i notched back to 7, my speed would drop down a couple of mph, but as it did the amp meter would climb right back to the same 1200 amps that was required to move the train up the hill in the first place, only slower. I never had a break in two on that hill, but it was a knuckle junkyard. Those trains were around 14,000 tons, with four 3,000 hp motors. Later, the trains got bigger, so they started using manned helpers out of Topeka, and they would stay with the train all the way to Emporia, then cut off and run back lite to Topeka. I liked the helper job, so worked it once in a while when life in the Wellington pool started to make me crazy. Sometimes, the DS would call and have another shove for us, one time I pushed three to Emporia in one long day. But later when they started using DP, the helpers went away, and that was that, but it was fun while it lasted.

Tom,

Wonderful post and so full of great information.  One thing that struck me as I was reading the end of your post regarding how your profession has changed was how similar the situation is in my chosen profession, and they are in no way alike.  We have amazing tools to work with today in the building trades but unfortunately, they sometimes are too good and allow people to get by without having the depth of knowledge that was required when everything was done on a real drafting board.  Now we are grappling with how AI has come into the profession, and it certainly has some very promising opportunities.  However, the downside is there will be those who rely on these tools without having the pre-requisite knowledge on how to understand when the tool is giving you garbage.

I learned to be an architect from other architects who knew more than I did and took the time to pass it down to me and many were truly masters of their craft.  Most of what I learned isn't in a book and can't be found on the internet.  Thanks for sharing, Tom.  I agree.  You ought to consider a book with your wealth of knowledge and gifted writing skills.

Great story, Tom, and good train-handling information.

Unfortunately one of the unintended consequences of advancing technology is receding knowledge. I saw it in railroading and in aviation. I once flew some flights with a guy who engaged the auto-pilot at about 500 feet off the ground just after putting the gear up, and left it engaged until we were about 100 feet off the ground when landing. He is an accident waiting to happen because if that autopilot ever fails, he's dead. There are railroad engineers and truck drivers (steering wheel holders) like this, too.

Big Jim has it right.

@Big Jim posted:

Sadly now through evolution, the old adage "I've forgotten more about railroading than you will ever know" becomes the truth rather than the derision!

Sad, but true, Jim.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×