Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Don't know how much help this would be, but in Robert J. Church's book, "Southern Pacific Daylight Locomotives", on page 392, are the color chips for the various SP Daylight colors.

 

Also, here are the color "numbers" for Dupont, Imron Line polyurethane industrial paint:

 

Orange  =  #31UH

Red       =  #35405U

Gray      =  #586U  (lettering/striping gray)

Black     =  #99UH

 

These are the paint colors that SP4449 has been painted with, ever since 1980 when she was repainted from the American Freedom Train, red, white, and blue, to SP Daylight colors. Naturally she has been re-painted several times, but the same Dupont colors are always used.

 

Maybe if there is a Dupont Automotive Paint Store near you, they could get you a small quantity of the color/colors you need, and then you could match those.

Thanks everyone for the responses!  I have Church's book too and that is what I'm trying to match.

 

I mean't to say Red, Blue and Yellow not Green.

 

So far I'm testing mixtures of Scalecoat D&H Yellow and CB&Q Red.  Somewhere between 8:1 and 10:1 yellow to red is close but...  The D&H Yellow seems to have the least amount of blue but still too much.

One of the difficulties in scaling down sound and color is the distance factor.  When we look at a train going by we are frequently 100 to 200 +/- feet away from the surface of the painted surface.  This softens the effect of any finish.

What you are trying to recreate may not be so much the exact  surface color but what that surface will look like at an average viewing distance. tt

It also depends on lighting conditions.

 

The imitation aluminum used on CB&Q F-units would look white, gray, beige-tan, or anything inbetween depending on the light.

 

I recall reading an article in the long defuct Locomotive and Railway Preservation magazine.  A museum was restoring a UP sleeper, they discovered 14 different shades of UP Armour Yellow as the paint was being removed.

 

Rusty

Rusty, We have a tendency to think there is only one version of whatever prototype anything when in reality, especially with paint, near the end of that subject's era, compliance to  specs was not that strict.

 

On a local level we get a kick out of a local paint supplier advertising accureate, exact 235 year old Philadelphia house and trim colors.

 

We can't get exact 50 year old replacation while some of the principals are still alive.

Last edited by Tom Tee

Without doubt fellas, color theory as it is applied to a surface is a complete crap-shoot. All you can do is find the color that the community has mutually agreed is the closest memory serves. 

 

Do I need to explain, again?

 

Have a peak at this thread posted last year:

https://ogrforum.com/t...677#6498170301833677

 

"

May 28, 2012 9:53 AM
 

Marker- These issues directly-play in the "perceived" color seen on your computer screen. 

 

Firstly- are you color blind or color hyper-sensitive? A professor I had; a woman that helped develop the Pantone Matching System told me in experiments in Europe in the 1970's they estimated that women see colors on average at 40-70% more intensely then men. Like anything we all get used to what we see; can you imagine stepping into a woman's eyes for say 10 minutes? The world would look like a Monet painting I am sure. I would guess this has a lot to do with a woman's love of flowers. 

 

When it comes to perceived colors, the digital camera:

 

1- Digital Camera sensors, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Kodak, etc, etc all see color differently based on the people that write the firmware that tells the sensors (CMOS, CCD etc) to "imitate" film based on a gamut of professional photographers.

2- Computer monitors are "all" different, no two are exactly the same add your personal settings such as contrast, brightness and its all a crap-shoot

3- Computer video cards also can have an affect on color temperature and range, cools to warms. 

4- Is a digital image edited with a photo editing program, color saturation added or removed, etc, etc. 

 

When it comes to analog color slides these issues guarantee serious trouble when trying to come up with a match.

 

1- Certain brands of color film use different dies that in time blend or combined or faded with one another to shift the percieved color(s). Computer models have been developed to correct a lot of these issues based on each brands tendencies to color-shift. Still they are all somewhat speculation and not 100% dependable.

2- Time of day the photo was taken, cool morning light, warm evening, warm Summer light, cool Fall light in the warm hot morning sunrise.. All of these dynamics directly change how a color looks to the human eye.

3- Paints fade fast, especially reds, yellows, any color with a warm color range tends to desaturate the fastest. When photographed depending on the time of day or year the odds that color is what the paint manufacturer wanted us to see is null at best.

 

When it comes to color sample chips:

 

1- Was the chip stored correctly away from UV damage?

2- Was the chip stored in high heat that can change the color based on a chemical reaction due to heat?

3- Was the chip correct? Serious- who sprayed it? Was the paint really correct? authentic records kept for where the paint chip originated? Was it a shop in Barstow guessing at the right color in 1956 based on a faded sample and hand mixed based on trial and error? 

 

In the end the odds of getting a color exactly correct is next to impossible, it is right or wrong to everybody depending on who is looking at it and when. So if we all agree a color looks good that is really rare and outstanding! 

 

Funny but true story, in the antique car hobby I had a buddy with a 1952 VW beetle in L-11 Pastel Green. A 50,000 odd mile unrestored original car, absolutely perfect. At a concours show he was judged for having mixed and applied the wrong color that did not match the chips the judges used to compare; obviously the judges did not know it was factory applied paint. It was an argument that lasted for hours. Finally after word got to the judges this was an original car they seriously began to doubt the records they were using in the color samples. My guess is the car is faded? Or are the samples right? It is a terrible conundrum to be in.

 

In the graphics and arts business we developed the Pantone (tm) system of matching colors. A 4 digit code that tells everyone in the world what the color should be. The ATSF model along with all the models colors based on research were matched to a Pantone number so the builder would get it exactly right to the decisions made about the colors. It all lands in the laps of the experts; and are the experts right? God only knows.

 

I agree this color used on the ATSF units is dead on. The previous runs KMI has done have also been right. Certainly a warm punchy yellow/red. Just as Mr Knickerboker wanted it."

And yet another VERY good point Tom mentions to consider. The effect of atmospheric perspective; yet another huge range of variables. ChipR has mentioned to me an English standard or group of insistently obsessive Englishmen that have come up with a formula of sorts as to scaled down colors.
 
Originally Posted by Tom Tee:

One of the difficulties in scaling down sound and color is the distance factor.  When we look at a train going by we are frequently 100 to 200 +/- feet away from the surface of the painted surface.  This softens the effect of any finish.

What you are trying to recreate may not be so much the exact  surface color but what that surface will look like at an average viewing distance. tt

I have found in illustration it is rather difficult to desaturate reds, oranges and other warm colors. Certainly red likes to turn pink despite any efforts to avoid using white the dirty ugly color as we refer to it in the arts- any artist of any professional level will tell you she or he rarely if ever has white or black on their pallets. White is naughty, very naughty and destroys any color you throw it at; unless that is your intention.. it is an effective vehicle to desaturate a color that much is certain; too much and its dead. In orange you add cad-yellows and you warm it up rather than lighten its response. Add white and you blow it all together, same with black. Crimsons and magentas are a wonderful tint- they have an almost neutral effect on the perceived color but manage to darken with just the right amount of punch.. This is why you find the crimson and magenta families in Giclee printer ink sets. glaze over with a transparent violet and your in business. Black seems like a natural to darken a color but rather it destroys the intensity instantly. Much like white removes the saturation of a color. It is interesting to note that both of the naughty colors live outside the color wheel.

While referencing the Pantone system, you may want to add that it too, must get adjusted based upon the material being painted or printed: coated or uncoated paper, plastic or metal that's primed (or not) with what, and the composition of the actual color pigment used.

 

Not to mention the conditions the object will usually be viewed in.

Absolutely!

Originally Posted by PRR Man:

       

While referencing the Pantone system, you may want to add that it too, must get adjusted based upon the material being painted or printed: coated or uncoated paper, plastic or metal that's primed (or not) with what, and the composition of the actual color pigment used.

 

Not to mention the conditions the object will usually be viewed in.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×