Replies sorted oldest to newest
Not much of a lubricant , however, it does work wonders for removing tar from an auto fender.
I was told a long time ago that it was more a solvent than a lubricant, worked because it dissolved old oil, grease and dirt. ??? Don't really use it.
RickO posted:Not much of a lubricant , however, it does work wonders for removing tar from an auto fender.
I actually think an SD-40 would remove the fender (and whole vehicle) from the tar (pavement)...
I always keep it handy
SD-40 - What is it, a Chinese knockoff of WD-40?
TrainsRMe posted:SD-40 - What is it, a Chinese knockoff of WD-40?
That's my assumption. I'd thought sharing it here would give us all a chuckle!
LOL where did you get that ?
WD-40 is not a lubricant, IS highly flammable and leaves a nasty residue.
While WD-40 and chinese knockoffs may have a place in a plumber's toolbox (WD = water displacement), it doesn't really belong in a toy train enthusiasts kit, especially as a lubricant.
When I had a bicycle shop lotta customers used WD as a chain lubricant and then couldn't understand why their chains had seized up.
If you're really desperate WD can be used as a contact cleaner in case you don't have the real thing, which is Caig Laboratories DeoxIT D5.
Pete
bmoran4 posted:TrainsRMe posted:SD-40 - What is it, a Chinese knockoff of WD-40?
That's my assumption. I'd thought sharing it here would give us all a chuckle!
Didn't even catch that bjmoran! Indeed it does come up as a Chinese wd40 knock off when you search. Looks like the label was changed to look less similar at some point.
WD-40 is a cleaner not a lubricant. It will prevent rust if used properly. If you use it to prevent rust on tools, spray it on and let it drip off. Don't wipe it off let it dry.
WD-40 got its reputation in Nam with GIs trying to get their M16s to work. Still trying to get them to work. There are a lot of products on the market now for cleaning and lubing things.
WD-40 is NOT a very good lubricant, and it's REALLY LOUSY for long term storage! I've gotten guns that people have "preserved" with WD-40 and stored for a few years, the stuff turns into glue! I had to soak several of them in solvent for days to loosen the WD-40 sludge enough to get it apart for a proper cleaning.
Snopes has an interesting page that gives some information about WD-40, it looks fairly accurate.
Snopes - Household Uses for WD-40
They started with a popular list of "uses" and asked the manufacturer which were valid. Truthfully, I'm not sure I'd recommend using it for many of the manufacturer's recommendations either, but that's another story.
To the dismay of weekend warrior handy-men everywhere, WD-40 and Duct Tape are almost never the right tool for the job.
Folks have it pretty well covered as to why up above me.
JGL
I am fairly certain I do not won a roll of Duct/Duck Tape or a can of WD-40. Both are worthless as far as I am concerned
Well, I almost never use WD-40, even though I confess to having a can of it around. However, I do use duct tape on occasion, it's great for temporary adhesion. I rarely consider it for anything permanent, but it has excellent adhesion properties and is good for holding things down or together.
For some reason some like to insist that WD-40 is NOT a lubricant. It actually IS a lubricant, among many other things which it is much better at, such as displacing water. Its Material Safety Data Sheet indicates it contains up to 25% petroleum based oil. It's just a very poor lubricant for most of the uses train modelers require. My duck guns routinely get wet. My trains do not. A jack of all trades product like this is sometimes useful, but there are usually better choices.
I hope Red Green doesn't see this thread.
German posted:My duck guns routinely get wet. My trains do not. A jack of all trades product like this is sometimes useful, but there are usually better choices.
I hope you clean the WD-40 off before you put them away for long term storage.
Duct tape and WD-40 are excellent products for their intended purposes. Not "having any around" is just inefficient.
Do not use duct tape for open-heart surgery "closings", or the like. Do use it for something that breaks or leaks and cannot be properly fixed immediately (or even for a while - but just a while).
WD-40 is excellent as WD-40 - a penetrating (etc) oil, that is also, BTW, the best way to clean (with a rag) your layout tracks. It also smells good.
So far as I recall, from the news, at least, the M-16 killed people just fine. And, on the subject of guns, I have a few, accidentally (inherited and/or adolescent shotgun desires), but care little about the subject - though mine are "stored" on a gun rack, no WD-40, just 3-in-1, every few years, maybe. No rust.
The surprising part is the apparently strong feelings that a common lubricant/etc and a common adhesive temporary (!) repair tape engendered. It's just WD-40 and duct tape, dudes.
Matt Makens posted:I am fairly certain I do not won a roll of Duct/Duck Tape or a can of WD-40. Both are worthless as far as I am concerned
Now now. Duct tape and WD-40 are vital components in every red neck tool box. If it moves and shouldn't...duct tape. If it doesn't move and should...WD-40.
High humidity in the south often oxidizes metals (especially nuts and bolts) and prevents them from moving the way they should (when you want to remove the nut from the bolt), especially in outdoor situations. WD-40 is excellent for loosening the grip of the metals. As noted above, however, it is not effective as a long-term lubricant.
I have Bust-A-Nut, Jigaloo, every imaginable type of Liquid Wrench, 3 in 1, TeF-Gel but no WD40. As for Duck/Duct tape, I just dont have any but I usually do have better solutions than tape anyhow
It amazes me how many here have jumped on to the "lubrication war path" instead of actually seeing the humor...
bmoran4 posted:TrainsRMe posted:SD-40 - What is it, a Chinese knockoff of WD-40?
That's my assumption. I'd thought sharing it here would give us all a chuckle!
They even used WD-40's same descriptive phrases on their can.
I see th humor and want the SD40 to bust the rust. Thinking about tracking down a can
bmoran4 posted:It amazes me how many here have jumped on to the "lubrication war path" instead of actually seeing the humor...
Reading/observing skills and a sense of humor are often lacking around here - especially when some see a chance to hop on their favorite dead horse!
As the guys on MST3K always said, "The right people will get their jokes"
Thanks for the posting.
Jim
WD-40 was developed DOD to protect the metal surfaces of missiles. WD is for water displacement and 40 is for version #40 of the firm's R&D effort. It was never intended to be used as a lubricant. It is, however, a great solvent and moisture displacement liquid.
It is also great at removing the remains of plastic bags and associated inks (like bread, rolls, etc) that are placed on flat surface warm/hot range tops. Let it soak/sit for about 15 minutes and it comes right off.
I suspect it has many/most of the chemicals in paint brush restoration liquids. The actual composition is unknown since the company did not patent the product: in getting patent protection, the composition would be public knowledge and they preferred to keep that a secret.
bmoran4 posted:It amazes me how many here have jumped on to the "lubrication war path" instead of actually seeing the humor...
What humor? Proper lubrication is no laughing matter!
Pete
The improved version of the product will be called SD40-2!
I finally get it. SD-40 is a type of diesel locomotive.
Id prefer the 21st century version SD40-3. What does the "SD" stand for "Sorta Displaces" and the 40 must mean the 40th copy
Ok are 'ya ready for this? I have a friend who cleans his N gauge track with a WD40 rag and found that all the blinking of passenger lights, etc. have gone away. And he doesn't have to do it every month.
So...
Wasn't there a Lionel video on track cleaning that used like Goo Gone to clean and then WD-40 for added conductivity in the rails? I can't find it, but I think I remember seeing something like this (or similar) from Lionel somewhere? It was a couple of years ago at least.
And they had to recall a so called improved product: SDP40F!