Skip to main content

This tape has some of the most perfectly groomed high performance steam locomotives crackin the whip on fast passenger trains. Oh, how fortunate are the Brits! Beautiful scenery, great atmosphere, superbly filmed - - take a gander! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mcDsY0TwcA

Last edited by mark s
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Ron H:

The Brits don't hold back. They run them like the used to. Good track!

 

I've seen the UP 844 making 70_80 mph and it was awesome.

You are are right about the brit not holding back.I think they had some of their trains runing 125.In the movie fried green tomatoes.There is a sence where 290 roares by pulling freight.It reminded me of my grand parents telling me about the trains they saw.Come to think of it america didn,t hold back ether. 

It's funny.  I look at steam engines and in some ways, no matter how massive they are, they almost seem "delicate" to me.   All of those rods, bearings, and valves reciprocating at outrageous velocities.   It's surreal at some level.  I've grown up in a generation where all of the moving parts are hidden; cars are the perfect example.  Lift the hood on a new car and chances are all you see are battery terminals, some fluid caps, and a huge plastic cover.  The stuff that actually makes it 'go' is conveniently obscured from view.  Perhaps thats part of my captivation with steam engines - it's all right THERE.

Originally Posted by thestumper: Well put.

It's funny.  I look at steam engines and in some ways, no matter how massive they are, they almost seem "delicate" to me.   All of those rods, bearings, and valves reciprocating at outrageous velocities.   It's surreal at some level.  I've grown up in a generation where all of the moving parts are hidden; cars are the perfect example.  Lift the hood on a new car and chances are all you see are battery terminals, some fluid caps, and a huge plastic cover.  The stuff that actually makes it 'go' is conveniently obscured from view.  Perhaps thats part of my captivation with steam engines - it's all right THERE.

 

British railroads will allow mainline running of steam but the locomotives must be in really good shape to certified.
That said, they do have incidents from time to time: http://www.rypn.org/forums/vie....php?f=1&t=34335
 
 
Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:

Excellent video, Mark!  Thank you for sharing!

 

Does anyone know why they sometimes ran with the left headlight on, sometimes the right, sometimes both left and right, and sometimes a center one?

The location of the light on the front end tells people on the platform what type of train it is. They don't use headlights the way they're used here in the US, as they have very few grade crossings to worry about. Believe it or not, it's common for a Brit engine crew to be humming along and not being able to see anything ahead of them. Don't ask me why that is...

Originally Posted by p51:
British railroads will allow mainline running of steam but the locomotives must be in really good shape to certified.
That said, they do have incidents from time to time: http://www.rypn.org/forums/vie....php?f=1&t=34335
 
 
Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:

Excellent video, Mark!  Thank you for sharing!

 

Does anyone know why they sometimes ran with the left headlight on, sometimes the right, sometimes both left and right, and sometimes a center one?

The location of the light on the front end tells people on the platform what type of train it is. They don't use headlights the way they're used here in the US, as they have very few grade crossings to worry about. Believe it or not, it's common for a Brit engine crew to be humming along and not being able to see anything ahead of them. Don't ask me why that is...

Lee,

That makes sense.  Do you mean tells railroad employees or also passengers on the platform what type train it is?  I could see that the general public is probably a lot more informed on railroad practices than they are here.

 

Thank you very much!

Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:
Do you mean tells railroad employees or also passengers on the platform what type train it is?

Beats me, I assume mostly for RR employees, but riding trains is FAR more common there and in Europe than it is here. Maybe passengers are savvy enough to be able to read the light placement. Every decent sized town across the pond has a RR depot if its served by a passenger hauling line at all.

It's actually common in Europe to be at a gathering of adults who live in a decent sized town or city and you then discover that none of them own a car and several don't even have drivers licenses. That's why US service people are so popular over there because many of them have cars (and can buy gas at greatly reduced prices, partially subsidized by the US government).

Originally Posted by p51:
Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:
Do you mean tells railroad employees or also passengers on the platform what type train it is?

.

It's actually common in Europe to be at a gathering of adults who live in a decent sized town or city and you then discover that none of them own a car and several don't even have drivers licenses. That's why US service people are so popular over there because many of them have cars (and can buy gas at greatly reduced prices, partially subsidized by the US government).

Not sure which books you are reading or films you are watching but that's the biggest load    of rubbish I have read in a long time!

Originally Posted by Ukaflyer:
Originally Posted by p51:
Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:
Do you mean tells railroad employees or also passengers on the platform what type train it is?

.

It's actually common in Europe to be at a gathering of adults who live in a decent sized town or city and you then discover that none of them own a car and several don't even have drivers licenses. That's why US service people are so popular over there because many of them have cars (and can buy gas at greatly reduced prices, partially subsidized by the US government).

Not sure which books you are reading or films you are watching but that's the biggest load    of rubbish I have read in a long time!

No books or movies. Saw this myself several times in Europe. In the Netherlands especially, I knew plenty of adults who didn't own cars.

Originally Posted by p51:
Originally Posted by Ukaflyer:
Originally Posted by p51:
Originally Posted by Mark Boyce:
Do you mean tells railroad employees or also passengers on the platform what type train it is?

.

It's actually common in Europe to be at a gathering of adults who live in a decent sized town or city and you then discover that none of them own a car and several don't even have drivers licenses. That's why US service people are so popular over there because many of them have cars (and can buy gas at greatly reduced prices, partially subsidized by the US government).

Not sure which books you are reading or films you are watching but that's the biggest load    of rubbish I have read in a long time!

No books or movies. Saw this myself several times in Europe. In the Netherlands especially, I knew plenty of adults who didn't own cars.

......and which era are you referring to because I don't remember a time like that and I have been here a good number of years

I think it's a mistake to lump all passenger services together. I lived in Chicago and used the CTA to go everywhere and did not own a car. It was less expensive in consideration of high parking fees both on the street or in a garage let alone the congestion or trying to find a place to park. Light rail is also encouraging this for younger people, particularly students. When the North Shore was running, they would run up to eight jam packed cars with sailors on leave and I am sure the Metra now provides the same services.

Long distance trains versus intercity trains are a different animal. Many intercity trains are recognized for their importance as states pony up to subsidize them. 

Long distance trains are in a class by themselves until the USPS gets back on board ( as their experts have advised them) to cross subsidize passenger services. The synergy between two government agencies not being utilised is just stupidity in my book.

Last edited by electroliner

I was fortunate to see British steam trains as a teenager when they were still in regular service.  What impresses me the most is the maintenance of both the engines and rolling stock.  The preservation is first class.

 

British trains did not have headlights.  Most carried marker lamps that told the people in the signal towers which train was passing by the code.  Large number boards were displayed during the day for the same purpose on many of the rail lines.

 

Headlights were not necessary because much of the right of way is fenced.  Cows and other critters on the tracks were very rare.  You don't see "cow catchers" on British steam locomotives either.  The infrastructure was well maintained and you seldom had washouts, falling rocks or other stuff on the tracks.  Therefore, a train could run at speed, following the signals with confidence that it wouldn't hit anything.

 

Grade crossing were manned by men who operated the gates.  Automatic crossing gates were just being introduced in the 1950s.  The grade crossing gates completely covered the road in both directions.    People did not trespass on the tracks.

 

I was lucky to see all of this during the transition period to diesels.  Thanks for sharing the video.  It brings back many pleasant memories.

 

Joe

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Joe Barker:

 

Headlights were not necessary because much of the right of way is fenced.  Cows and other critters on the tracks were very rare.  You don't see "cow catchers" on British steam locomotives either.  The infrastructure was well maintained and you seldom had washouts, falling rocks or other stuff on the tracks.  Therefore, a train could run at speed, following the signals with confidence that it wouldn't hit anything.

 

Grade crossing were manned by men who operated the gates.  Automatic crossing gates were just being introduced in the 1950s.  The grade crossing gates completely covered the road in both directions.    People did not trespass on the tracks.

 


 

 

 

 

Thanks Joe for your comments.

I still have a hard time seeing myself as engineer running a loco at speed in the dark!!!

I used to play a little trick on visiting friends. If we were out after dark there was a section of road I had driven so many time I could do it in the dark.....and I did.

Friends would actually scream when I cut the lights at 45 mph and drive for a mile or so.

Way out in the middle of nowhere it was DARK. Can't imagine running a speeding loco the same way....gotta hand it to our Brits!!!

Some of the locomotives pictured in the tape are Merchant Navy Class......very handsome machines and seemingly quite modern in apurtanances. At the time of their construction, a larger high speed passenger locomotive was needed for the Southern Ry, so a 4-8-2 was proposed. But, the civil engineers on the railroad objected re the higher axle weight, so they went to the smaller  4-6-2 locomotive. Which somewhat tells the story of British steam......small locomotives, but highly refined. The Merchant Navy class when built, had a full streamlined jacket (later removed) and were nicknamed "Spam Cans"!

       In 1960 my Uncle had visited England and he picked up a "train spotters" hip pocket locomotive guide for me. Of course, at that time much of British Rail was steam operated (they built their last new steam locomotive in March 1960). I was quite surprised to see locomotives as old as 1860's construction dates, still in operation. Additionally was surprised to see that BR had stabled two Beyer-Garretts, for "banking" (pushers on grades, not to take cash deposits!). Have always had an affectionate spot for British steam.

http://www.watercressline.co.u...cles/extra/35005.jpg

http://api.ning.com/files/*wrR...mainlinesteam019.jpg

Last edited by mark s
Originally Posted by AMCDave:
 

I still have a hard time seeing myself as engineer running a loco at speed in the dark!!!

I used to play a little trick on visiting friends. If we were out after dark there was a section of road I had driven so many time I could do it in the dark.....and I did.

Friends would actually scream when I cut the lights at 45 mph and drive for a mile or so.

Way out in the middle of nowhere it was DARK. Can't imagine running a speeding loco the same way....gotta hand it to our Brits!!!

One night our train was headed around a curve to the left and there was a road just off to my right and below the roadbed. Some smarty in a car speeded up to the side and was pacing us around the curve. The headlights on the unit was illuminating the road pretty good, so, the driver in the car turned his headlights off and was negotiating the curve by the light from our unit. That's when I turned my headlights off and left him in the dark.

Originally Posted by Big Jim:

Here is a nice one from the footboard of the Duke of Gloucester. 

The correct term is "footplate", which means "cab ride" to we colonists.

 

This is an extremely well done video, and a few interesting points I noticed:

 

1) The British steam locomotives have steam powered brake system for the locomotive (independent brake for us), while the train braking system is vacuum. 

 

2) I found it interesting that the Fireman periodically puts a blocking device in the fire doors, or leaves the fire doors completely open at times. Must be for smoke abatement?

 

3) Notice how smoothly the cab signal/train contra system worked.

 

3) Notice that the Driver (Engineer) initially applied the train brakes, in order to slow to 75!!!!! Although he never stated what his top speed was, I'll bet it was close to 90.

 

4) Don't you just love the exhaust sounds of those British 3-Cylinder 4-6-2 locomotives?

 

Forgot to add:

 

5) Nobody is wearing safety glasses/googles!

 

6) Nobody is wearing those stupid looking high-visability "safety vests/jackets".

 

 

EXCELLENT video, and thanks for posting THAT ONE!

Last edited by Hot Water

Chaps,

 

First video - The Head Code, the lights on the loco front, told men in the multitude of signal boxes the type of train and route.  Vital as the number of trains was immense.  

 

Second video - Thank goodness I was smart enough to be a Life Member of the Duke of Gloucester Society and a share owner of the Bluebell Railway Society.

 

http://www.theduke.uk.com/

 

http://www.bluebell-railway.com/

 

ChipR

 

quote:
The correct term is "footplate", which means "cab ride" to we colonists.

Yeah, I realized what I had written later that day and forgot to go back and change it. I knew someone would catch it.

quote:
2) I found it interesting that the Fireman periodically puts a blocking device in the fire doors, or leaves the fire doors completely open at times. Must be for smoke abatement?

And how the Driver locks the reverser.
I'm glad I didn't have to switch with a reverser like that!

Last edited by Big Jim
Originally Posted by Big Jim:
quote:
2) I found it interesting that the Fireman periodically puts a blocking device in the fire doors, or leaves the fire doors completely open at times. Must be for smoke abatement?

And how the Driver locks the reverser.
I'm glad I didn't have to switch with a reverser like that!

Something else I forgot to mention:

 

Did anyone notice that the Driver (Engineer) closed the regulator (throttle) COMPLETELY when it was time to slow down, plus he "added a little blower"? Are those British 3-Cylinder steam locomotives THAT different that the Driver can simply close the regulator without  drawing a vacuum in the smokebox? Also, how do the cylinders get lubrication with the regulator closed?  They must not do "power braking" either on their passenger trains.

 

Still a FANTASTIC video! 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Big Jim:
quote:
2) I found it interesting that the Fireman periodically puts a blocking device in the fire doors, or leaves the fire doors completely open at times. Must be for smoke abatement?

And how the Driver locks the reverser.
I'm glad I didn't have to switch with a reverser like that!

Something else I forgot to mention:

 

Did anyone notice that the Driver (Engineer) closed the regulator (throttle) COMPLETELY when it was time to slow down, plus he "added a little blower"? Are those British 3-Cylinder steam locomotives THAT different that the Driver can simply close the regulator without  drawing a vacuum in the smokebox? Also, how do the cylinders get lubrication with the regulator closed?  They must not do "power braking" either on their passenger trains.

 

Still a FANTASTIC video! 

I did notice that but didn't think anything of it at first, until you mentioned it.  The folks in Wolsztyn, Poland do the same with their steam, sometimes coasting for what seemed like a couple of miles into a station stop.  Thanks to the language barrier I never could inquire as to why this was possible, but I had to guess it was one of the many lines coming off the lubricator running to the steam chest area.  Trying to dig up a picture, maybe you can shed some light on it...

---EDIT---
Found these pics from my trip.  Is it just me, or do they have the mechanical lubricator piped to the bushings on the valve gear?  Would that be enough lubrication, or even the right type, for this to make sense?

 

 

OL49-69 Right Side Steam Chest from side

OL49-69 Right Side Steam Chest

Attachments

Images (2)
  • OL49-69 Right Side Steam Chest from side
  • OL49-69 Right Side Steam Chest
Last edited by Blystovski

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×