Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Very informative especially seeing how all the accessories worked.  Gilbert and Lionel Cowen died about the same time, in an era when trains were no longer the main means of long distance travel and slot car racing took over as the rage. If these men had lived  longer, we can wonder how these brilliant men could have directed their companies to survive through the societal transitions. 

C W Burfle posted:

Here is a link to the Eli Whitney Museum that better shows what other material they have on Gilbert: "The Gilbert Project".

Excellent, thoughtful article. I had no idea that Jack Wrather, producer of the TV show "Lassie", effectively bought the company. I recall his name well on the closing credits for Lassie every Sunday early-evening.

eddiem posted:

... Correction: Erector sets, no trains 'til 1937

brr posted:

..., and was about selling Erector Sets and Chemistry sets, not toy trains. Gilbert didn't purchase American Flyer until later. ...

maybe so, but don't think he did not have his mind on trains occasionally before that...

1926 - No. 1052 locomotive
#1052 locomotive from the 1926 #10 set.  collector tip... original wheels (only parts exclusively in the extremely rare 1926 set) were cast iron; if a magnet won't stick, they are reproductions.  i've managed to pick up one original wheel which would put me on schedule to score the 4th on my 120th birthday.

cheers...gary

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1926 - No. 1052 locomotive
Last edited by overlandflyer
Tinplate Art posted:

Gary: Is that model shown your's? VERY impressive collectible!

kind of glad you asked... well past time i brushed off a few years of dust.

took a few poor pictures to show a little more detail...

IMG_1430

IMG_1431

the motor (8-14 VAC/DC) goes through three stepdown gears and then uses a chain to drive both axles.  the gauge is just about 3.5" (min).  someday i might bring it up to LALS to see if it could run on their ¾" scale track.  probably only weighs about a pound or two so adding some weight for better traction might be in order.  i don't believe any car constructions were listed in the 1926 manual.

now that i see the condition, i recall it taking a fall some time ago.  good thing about erector sets... everything is 100% reparable!

fun stuff! ...gary

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_1430
  • IMG_1431
Last edited by overlandflyer

Great video of a genius inventor that helped shape the 20th century but at the same time this video is very sad. Both A.C Gilbert  and Lionel Cowan employed thousands of talented American factory workers and crafts people. These skilled workers produced high quality products and were once able to earn a good living and enjoy a good middle class life. With the introduction of TV, computers, & video games and the movement of American manufacturing to Asia, we are a far different country today.  Our once prosperous factories now lie dormant, re-purposed, or are being left to rot and decay.   Most young people can't build anything. They should only know what they have missed.

" Our once prosperous factories now lie dormant, re-purposed, or are being left to rot and decay.   Most young people can't build anything. They should only know what they have missed."

For an alternate perspective, factory work in previous days was brutal for the health of employees, as was mining.  Much better to have this heavy and dangerous work performed by machines operated by a limited number of skilled workers not breathing fumes, particulates, etc. but operating from sound and air isolated booths or vehicles.  Terrific article in the NY Times on how the Swedish mining industry views automation.  It's great stuff for the workers and profitability.  

 

In my view, best not to be nostalgic about 19th and 20th century factory work.  It was generally dangerous, quite boring and distinctly unhealthy, if well paid.  I'm sure some folks now are nostalgic about the 19th and early 20th century when the railroads employed about 50% of the population.  Dirty, dangerous work however by today's standards.  Same goes for farm work, which employed 90% of the work force up until the mid to late-1800s and for thousands of years previously.  Now less than 1% of the work force in most developed countries.  Give me (and my offspring) an office or cubicle,  breathing clean air, doing challenging intellectual work, with  no likelihood of losing a digit or limb.   The decline in living standards in industrial nations is pretty much limited to places like the USA with no social safety net, no inexpensive retraining or education, and not much concern for the working class.  The situation is very different in places like Norway and Sweden .

"True, but thanks to OSHA, factory work is much safer than it once was."

Largely due to automation and robotics, which have drastically reduced the number of factory workers.  Hence my comments not to be too nostalgic about the good old days when lots of nice middle class jobs involved dangers to life and limb, but there were plenty of jobs.  Someone has to supervise, maintain and repair the robotics, and those blue collar jobs are still desirable, but not as numerous.  Plenty of non-office jobs to go around, as there always will be.  Not likely that nurses and medical technologists, the two most numerous middle class health care jobs,  are going to be replaced by robots any time soon, for example.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×