Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Cool paint job on the locomotive. The locomotive has a boxy mid-section just like the demo units that eventually evolved into ET44AC's and ET44C4's. It also has a new 12-cylinder 4400 horsepower prime mover that displaces 1010 cubic inches per cylinder. Sounds like CAT/EMD is taking a page out of GE's book. 

Originally Posted by NSPirate:

I hope it's a success for EMD/Progress Rail/Caterpillar. Maybe they can capture back some lost market share. It would be good for everyone involved if GE has a strong competitor to challenge it.

 

It won't sound like an EMD though. The 12 cylinder 12-1010-J prime mover is a 4-stroke (update of the 265H engine used in the 6000 HP SD90MACs) so it will chug.

 

I wonder if the familiar EMD turbo whine will still be a component of the overall sound. I hope so.

 

The 1010 stands for the cubic inch displacement of one cylinder, as has been EMD's practice since the 567. By way of comparison, the GEVO's V-12 has a 959 cubic inch displacement per cylinder.

Originally Posted by Nick Chillianis:
Originally Posted by NSPirate:

I hope it's a success for EMD/Progress Rail/Caterpillar. Maybe they can capture back some lost market share. It would be good for everyone involved if GE has a strong competitor to challenge it.

 

It won't sound like an EMD though. The 12 cylinder 12-1010-J prime mover is a 4-stroke (update of the 265H engine used in the 6000 HP SD90MACs) so it will chug.

 

I wonder if the familiar EMD turbo whine will still be a component of the overall sound. I hope so.

 

No, since the 4-Stroke Cycle engine does not require a gear-driven turbine wheel at lower power settings, as the EMD 2-Stroke Cycle 567, 645, and 710 engines do.

 

The 1010 stands for the cubic inch displacement of one cylinder, as has been EMD's practice since the 567. By way of comparison, the GEVO's V-12 has a 959 cubic inch displacement per cylinder.

 

OK, so clearly this has a middle "hump" compared to the "old" sd70ace.
 
Are you guys saying you would buy this demonstrator scheme on the "non-tier-iv" shell, or does MTH need to modify its tooling to match this new prototype?
 
Originally Posted by mike.caruso:
Originally Posted by BobbyD:
Originally Posted by AGHRMatt:

OK MTH. Are you paying attention??? I need another SD70ACe like I need a hole in the head, but if you build it, they (and I) will buy.

 

Agree Matt! (Lionel and MTH?, to sell these they need to be correct tooling)

Count me in!  

 

Last edited by Martin H

Thanks for this information. Looks like EMD is going back to the 5-sided front windshield like the windshield on the SD70MAC. Also from the YouTube video on the Progress Rail website, the radial trucks on this Tier IV SD70 appear as if they were welded together unlike the cast HTC-R radial trucks on the earlier SD70ACe.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Also from the YouTube video on the Progress Rail website, the radial trucks on this Tier IV SD70 appear as if they were welded together unlike the cast HTC-R radial trucks on the earlier SD70ACe.

 

Yes, you are correct. The new "Radial truck" will be of a fabricated design, i.e. weldments of castings and plates.

 

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

Originally Posted by Martin H:
OK, so clearly this has a middle "hump" compared to the "old" sd70ace.
 
Are you guys saying you would buy this demonstrator scheme on the "non-tier-iv" shell, or does MTH need to modify its tooling to match this new prototype?
 
Originally Posted by mike.caruso:
Originally Posted by BobbyD:
Originally Posted by AGHRMatt:

OK MTH. Are you paying attention??? I need another SD70ACe like I need a hole in the head, but if you build it, they (and I) will buy.

 

Agree Matt! (Lionel and MTH?, to sell these they need to be correct tooling)

Count me in!  

 

I don't see a hump. Just a small transition where the engine bay starts.

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Thanks for this information. Looks like EMD is going back to the 5-sided front windshield like the windshield on the SD70MAC. Also from the YouTube video on the Progress Rail website, the radial trucks on this Tier IV SD70 appear as if they were welded together unlike the cast HTC-R radial trucks on the earlier SD70ACe.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Where do you see 5-sides?

 

Edit: Oh, you mean edges, sorry. I was thinking 3D shaped.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • EMD SD70ACe-T4
Last edited by Moonman
Originally Posted by ES44AC:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by ES44AC:

The cab looks reminiscent to the earlier widecab SD60, SD70, SD80, and SD90.

You mean "wide nose", as the cabs were/are not wider than any other cab EMD offered.

I've heard it called both.

That still doesn't mean that "wide cab" is correct, as the cab isn't any wider.

Originally Posted by PAUL ROMANO:

In my opinion and in my opinion the EMD Tier IV looks similar to the pre-production GE Tier IV locomotive which had the large hump. The large radiator and carbody design appear to be copied from GE. At first glance it even looks like a GE, in my opinion. You can argue the fact all you want seeing is believing........ 

Actually, "appearances" don't mean much. Economies of manufacturing is what is important, in order to meet the customer's requirements at a fair price.

From the information I found on the Progress Rail website, they call the 5-sided front windshield on this SD70ACe-T4, the “teardrop windshield”.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
Originally Posted by Moonman:
Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Thanks for this information. Looks like EMD is going back to the 5-sided front windshield like the windshield on the SD70MAC. Also from the YouTube video on the Progress Rail website, the radial trucks on this Tier IV SD70 appear as if they were welded together unlike the cast HTC-R radial trucks on the earlier SD70ACe.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Where do you see 5-sides?

 

Edit: Oh, you mean edges, sorry. I was thinking 3D shaped.

 

According to the information on the Progress Rail website, the SD70ACe-T4 is supposed to be 76’8” long, around 2’5” longer than the earlier SD70ACe, weighs more (428,000 lbs vs 420,000 lbs), has a higher maximum speed rating (75 mph vs 70 mph), has more Tractive HP (4400 vs 4300), has more starting tractive effort (200,000 lbs vs 189,000 lbs), more continuous tractive effort (175,000 lbs vs 155,000 lbs).

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,         

Naveen Rajan

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by PAUL ROMANO:

In my opinion and in my opinion the EMD Tier IV looks similar to the pre-production GE Tier IV locomotive which had the large hump. The large radiator and carbody design appear to be copied from GE. At first glance it even looks like a GE, in my opinion. You can argue the fact all you want seeing is believing........ 

Actually, "appearances" don't mean much. Economies of manufacturing is what is important, in order to meet the customer's requirements at a fair price.

I would have to agree.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Nick Chillianis:
Originally Posted by NSPirate:

I hope it's a success for EMD/Progress Rail/Caterpillar. Maybe they can capture back some lost market share. It would be good for everyone involved if GE has a strong competitor to challenge it.

 

It won't sound like an EMD though. The 12 cylinder 12-1010-J prime mover is a 4-stroke (update of the 265H engine used in the 6000 HP SD90MACs) so it will chug.

 

I wonder if the familiar EMD turbo whine will still be a component of the overall sound. I hope so.

 

No, since the 4-Stroke Cycle engine does not require a gear-driven turbine wheel at lower power settings, as the EMD 2-Stroke Cycle 567, 645, and 710 engines do.

 

The 1010 stands for the cubic inch displacement of one cylinder, as has been EMD's practice since the 567. By way of comparison, the GEVO's V-12 has a 959 cubic inch displacement per cylinder.

 

Thanks for the explanation, Jack. Will this engine therefore experience the sort of turbo lag which the GE units do?

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×