Skip to main content

How many of you weather your trains or leave them in the pristine condition they were when first unpacked? If you're a collector do you weather or leave it alone in the event you'd ever want to resell it? With so many mint, new in box descriptions of for sale items, am I correct to assume weathering crimps efforts to resell trains? Do operators weather more than collectors? Do you tinplate folks ever weather your trains? Are scalers more likely to weather than nonscalers? What are your personal feelings on the desirability of weathered trains? If you don't weather is it because it's your choice or more that you feel inept or intimidated and fearful your efforts could spell ruination for your trains? How many of you weather both your buildings and your trains, weather buildings but not trains, weather trains but not buildings, don't weather buildings or trains?

As I said, "To weather or not to weather, that is the question." Thanks for taking the time to answer it for me.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Weathering is like art. Everyone has their own tastes and preferences for weathering styles, techniques, and degree of "dirtiness".

 

Weathered trains are almost always more difficult to sell and will have lost value - UNLESS they are done as beautifully and realistically as laidoffsick just showed you. Then they command a premium price, but only to a select group of buyers. More often weathering is poorly done as is seen on the forum very frequently. But, again, what looks good to one person looks terrible to another.

 

Personally, I think weathering only looks good on full-scale models. Weathered semi-scale/postwar/tinplate etc. would just look like dirty toys IMO.

 

Jim

Weathered cars look good until you notice the wide gauge, wide wheels, molded on details and 3rd rail.    To me that's like super detailing a Lionel boxcar with a Giraffe's head sticking out the roof.  Weathering should be part of a scene as SIRT mentioned.    I love what Don Smith does, but unless you're going to buy a train full of his weathered cars ($$$$$) and run them on a very nicely done layout, whats the point?

 

But, to each there own. Of course.

I'm running a layout so mixed up its a nightmare.... steam on the rails with diesels..... probably about 30 different road names....... and who knows what else!  But the fact is, I have weathered a few of my items because it makes them look awesome to me.  As for going "all or nothing", well sure if your a stickler for sticking to a particular road or time or look.  But if your like me and just in it for fun then GO FOR IT!  Sure it might decrease the value if not done right, but if your "investing" in model trains then you aren't too bright to begin with!  

 

Having said that, I took a cheap caboose and feel like I've created a masterpiece!  Its clearcoated so it won't smudge or anything.  Sure most of my engines and cars are in perfect condition, but having a few weathered ones mixed in looks awesome!  

 

Before..... and after.

 

NYC Caboose Before and After

Attachments

Images (1)
  • NYC Caboose Before and After

Yeah - weather if you want.  Doesn't make any difference how many rails you have or even if there is a giraffe poking out.  It is a hobby.

 

That said, there are those of us who scratch our heads when a modeler goes completely realistic, creating scenes and rolling stock that could easily be mistaken for the real thing except for the track.  That is our right, but it does not make unrealistic track wrong for a hobbyist who likes it.

 

Opinion.

I love weathered trains but understand it's not for everyone (along the lines of adding graffiti to modern equipment).

 

What I find interesting is that there are layouts with stunning realism and detail that, to me anyhow, are ruined because of the minty fresh un-weathered trains. 

Originally Posted by bob2: 

That said, there are those of us who scratch our heads when a modeler goes completely realistic, creating scenes and rolling stock that could easily be mistaken for the real thing except for the track.  That is our right, but it does not make unrealistic track wrong for a hobbyist who likes it.

 

Opinion.

Maybe because that was all the physical space he had available, and COULDN'T model it 2-Rail!

I guess I just don't look at it as a WHOLE.  I say..... Oh wow thats a neat boxcar goign by...... oh wow thats a cool rusty caboose!  Neat look at that weathered steamer right beside a beautiful spotless SD70ace!   It's always neat when the entire layout and rolling stock and engines all fit the same protocol.... but I like a little of everything!  A mint boxcar running next to a rusty boxcar doesn't ruin the other.... I  just say "wow nice looking boxcars"!

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×