Skip to main content

My MTH Premier Hiawatha Hudson kept throwing traction tires. The engine has seen little track time before leaving the hobby in 2009, so it sat in storage for 4 years. After putting them back on 4 different times recently, I finally realized they must have stretched over time on the wheels, i.e., become more elastic, so I put the replacement set on and they're holding. I am glad the Lionel hex nut driver works on MTH locos, because that made it easier to get the side rods off.

 

Through this experience I wondered if anyone just runs their trains without traction tires? Less traction for sure, but maybe it's more realistic and less aggravating?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'll admit I run at least half of my engines without the traction tires.  Especially the heavy ones.  They don't seem to need them!  Now if you were running uphill a lot I could see the need for them possibly.  I myself have a pretty level layout with no inclines, though even a slight incline shouldn't matter.  So far each time one comes off I just take it on off and run the engine without.  I haven't had any slippage so far.    I would leave them off next time they come off and watch to see if you have any slipping of the wheels, and if not you're good to run without I'd say!  

 

I am/was in the same boat as you and as they fell off just left them off!  All of the ones who lost them are doing fantastic if not better so far because there isn't anything to hang up in the running gear of the steamers!

Last edited by tackindy

Which engines have the "flat tire", and which track you own, will have an impact on the crazy decision to run around naked. My diesel, and rectifier, if without a traction tire, will limp under load at best. One steamer does fine without it. Another just wobbled, and tipped so bad I stuck two thin O-rings on it till I could get a real tire again. Other thoughts might be eventual wear on the grooves edges, and track. Turnout, and crossover tracking performance is where I saw some intermediate issues too. Good luck

There is more discussion of this on this forum than I would ever imagine.  When one of my locomotives throws a traction tire, that is a sign the tire is due for replacement.  It generally only occurs when I have a layout with a grade.  When the tires are worn, I replace them and never have an issue again for many years.  Personally, I think many of these other fixes are solutions in search of a problem. 

When they go, I leave them off unless "performance" suffers. I run mostly steam and I have no grades, though, of course, a curve is the same as a modest grade.

 

I really hate them - the entire idea just annoys me, especially on expensive, scale models.

Put them on toy train set locos, fine. They are asked to pull 14% grades, and I don't care. But an adult, $1200, 18lb loco should be run in an adult fashion, and if your drivers are slipping, your loco is too light, or your train is too heavy or your grade is too extreme, or all or some of the above - just like the real thing.

 

Also, what was with the idea of chroming drivers? No wonder we needed Goodyears on them. Plain steel has a much better COF. 

 

I realize that the TT disease is chronic and can now never be expunged from the 3RO world, and I "accept" it - but it's still embarrassing. Plus, the very idea of putting an electrical insulator - the "rubber" tire - into an electrical circuit is just off on the face of it. Some of those third-rail roller pickup problems that can't be found are actually due to trying to run electricity through neoprene - from the outside rails. Good luck with that.

 

OK, that's off my chest. Whew.

 

HIP HIP HORAY!!!!!Originally Posted by RAL:

There is more discussion of this on this forum than I would ever imagine.  When one of my locomotives throws a traction tire, that is a sign the tire is due for replacement.  It generally only occurs when I have a layout with a grade.  When the tires are worn, I replace them and never have an issue again for many years.  Personally, I think many of these other fixes are solutions in search of a problem. 

 

But an adult, $1200, 18lb loco should be run in an adult fashion, and if your drivers are slipping, your loco is too light, or your train is too heavy or your grade is too extreme, or all or some of the above - just like the real thing.

 

Sorry but an 18 lb. locomotive is nowhere's near the real thing. Heck a 250 ton 1:1 locomotive would have to weigh in at over 5 tons in o gauge.

I've never been a fan of traction tires, although I can relate to the need for them at times. I always try running a locomotive without them at first and add them only if necessary. A well designed and manufactured locomotive really should need them and as a generally rule I find that lower price point models need traction tires more often. Traction tires also become more of a necessity when using grades, more/heavier rolling stock and tighter curves. If you can run without them I say go with it though. Tires are cars not trains. Even the whitewalls on an American Flyer are painted on.

Since initial posting about this, I've taken three more MTH Premier steamers out of storage. Besides dealing with batteries that won't hold a charge, all three engine's traction tires throw off after running just a couple of loops. 5-6 years storage and the tires become loose around the wheel, not to the naked eye, but loose enough they throw off while running. The tires themselves look okay, plenty of elasticity but they must stretch over time while on the wheels in the box.

 

 

 

Last edited by Paul Kallus
Originally Posted by Paul Kallus:

Since initial posting about this, I've taken three more MTH Premier steamers out of storage. The tires themselves look okay, plenty of elasticity but they must stretch over time while on the wheels in the box.

Paul,

In years past I informed my customers to change TT whenever an engine has been stored over 90 days. After all they're cheap.

 

God Bless,

"Pappy"

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×