Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

<Sarcasm on>

Has Ed Dickens blamed Steve Lee for the shutdown yet?

<Sarcasm off>

Good one!  I'll have to ask Steve. Everything else has been blamed on the previous steam crew. Check out that explanation in a recent Trains Magazine, which tries to answer the question of what that steam discharge under the right side of the cab on 4014, is. I haven't seen so many lies in such a few paragraphs, in a Trains Magazine in a very long time.

@Hot Water posted:

Good one!  I'll have to ask Steve. Everything else has been blamed on the previous steam crew. Check out that explanation in a recent Trains Magazine, which tries to answer the question of what that steam discharge under the right side of the cab on 4014, is. I haven't seen so many lies in such a few paragraphs, in a Trains Magazine in a very long time.

I saw it, Jack, and commented on it on T.O. (I'm Yankingeorgia over there)

His lies are just plain sickening.

I dropped "Trains" like a bad habit.

Their lipstick is all over the seat of Ed's overalls.

They've gotta dispose of all those DVDs of 4014 drifting with the cylinder cocks open, don't you know.

I saw it, Jack, and commented on it on T.O. (I'm Yankingeorgia over there)

His lies are just plain sickening.

I dropped "Trains" like a bad habit.

Their lipstick is all over the seat of Ed's overalls.

They've gotta dispose of all those DVDs of 4014 drifting with the cylinder cocks open, don't you know.

On the trip west for the big bash out in Utah, last year, the piston rod packing was blowing pretty bad. As much as they worked on it enroute, they couldn't get it stopped. The eventual cause was found to be a miscalculation of total piston rod travel through the packing, so when the piston rods were sent out to be re-ground, the full length of the rod travel wasn't ground, thus tearing up the metallic packing, every stroke.

Edit:

By the way, what issue of Trains Magazine was that farce published in?

Last edited by Hot Water

Jack thanks for advising us. We missed the announcement.

I am glad to see that of the 1 million people who Ed said saw the engine last season only 5 - 6 on here didn’t enjoy it.

In our part of the country the masses, us included,  would be delighted to be able to see steam again. It has been quite a while since the 611 derailed in the Swamp coming west from Norfolk.

@Hot Water posted:

On the trip west for the big bash out in Utah, last year, the piston rod packing was blowing pretty bad. As much as they worked on it enroute, they couldn't get it stopped. The eventual cause was found to be a miscalculation of total piston rod travel through the packing, so when the piston rods were sent out to be re-ground, the full length of the rod travel wasn't ground, thus tearing up the metallic packing, every stroke.

Edit:

By the way, what issue of Trains Magazine was that farce published in?

I know about the rod packing (although I didn't know the reason until you explained it) but he also had the cylinder cocks open much of the time too, more than I've ever seen them open on any other locomotive by any other engineer. Probably because the engine was drifting most of the time and thus producing little if any superheat, thereby causing water in the cylinders due to condensation.

As for the article, I saw it on Frisco1522's post on this thread. I don't subscribe to or read "Trains".

I have my own reservations about the UP Steam program and some of their operating tactics but I will say I was on hand at the Duluth Depot in MN to see 4014 creep into the station under her own power and detached from all of the train except the auxiliary tender.  The diesel and office cars were left further down the line.

I say creep because she was moving at a very slow pace.  The explanation being that they were unsure of that amount of weight on the quality of rail.  Do have to wonder, although quite some time ago, didn't the Yellowstones move to the ore docks over those same routes?

All right, I know I am going to get mocked. Crazy idea. How about 1 short trip next year with the 4014 and 844 hauling the 3985 dead in tow (cold) behind the 844. (or the bottle tenders) It would appear to be a triple header! They could have a year to prepare. The UP could out do them self's! And us 3985 fans could at least see the locomotive in movement one last time. The best happy medium a 3985 fan could expect. They could use 4014's tender, since it won't be holding any liquids. Again you would get people from all over the US to see that. Make it the 3985 final run. At least something to think about. Maybe Cheyenne to Denver?

Laugh away!

Last edited by Chuck Sartor

All right, I know I am going to get mocked. Crazy idea. How about 1 short trip next year with the 4014 and 844 hauling the 3985 dead in tow (cold) behind the 844. It would appear to be a triple header! They could have a year to prepare. The UP could out do them self's! And us 3985 fans could at least see the locomotive in movement one last time. The best happy medium a 3985 fan could expect. Again you would get people from all over the US to see that. Make it the 3985 final run. At least something to think about. Maybe Cheyenne to Denver?

Laugh away!

Chuck, just 2 points to consider:

1) The 4014 now has the tender from 3985, and the "original" tender from 4014 has NOT been rebuilt.

2) A steam locomotive can not be towed dead with the main rods attached, since without steam there would be no lubrication for the valves & pistons.

However, I'm not laughing!

I can see where lube to the cylinders would be a problem. But as much as Ed is beat down on this forum (and others), he is a very intelligent man and I would bet if he and his crew were given the task, they could find a way at minimal cost.

There's no such thing as "minimal cost" regarding a steam locomotive in the 21st century, be it dead or alive.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

All right, I know I am going to get mocked. Crazy idea. How about 1 short trip next year with the 4014 and 844 hauling the 3985 dead in tow (cold) behind the 844. (or the bottle tenders) It would appear to be a triple header! 

There you have it. 

Ed probably could have just given 4014 a fresh paint job and put dry ice in the stack and shoved it around and folks would be just as thrilled. Not unlike that Thomas the tank that goes around.

The phrase "all show and no go" comes to mind. 

Look at all the excitement when it was dragged cold and dead with an air whistle.

Which steamer was it that was dragged around horseshoe curve in the dark?... and folks were pandering to see it...it the dark...rusted, cold, and dead...really?

Well, I have a question for all the Ed critics here. If Ed was not a part of the steam program, Steve Lee would be retired by now and the next likely to take over would be Lynn Nystrum, and he is deceased as you know, who now would be running the Cheyenne show? Would the next manager have tackled the rebuilding the 4014 and 844?

Last edited by Chuck Sartor
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×