Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Ron_S:

UP does an excellent job of preserving certain historical units, kind of sad a 20 car consist of that caliber only runs a few times a year.

The UP executive passenger cars operate a LOT more than just a "few times a year". During last week's Denver Post Cheyenne Frontier Days Special, the UP also had an "inspection special" operating out in the northwest area, and that was 9 or 10 cars too. Shows how large the executive passenger car fleet really is on the UP. 

Originally Posted by Ron_S:

Other than the Cheyenne Frontier days, where does it run? I know there is the Denver to California train, but having difficulty finding others.

 

I believe you are confused, as UP does NOT have any "Denver to California train", only Amtrak provides passenger service. Any and all other operations of the UP executive passenger equipment is for UP Business purposes, i.e. Shippers, legislators, politicians, special invited guests, or internal executive inspection trips. None of the UP passenger operations are available to the general public, i.e. no tickets are sold.

 

The Cheyenne Frontier Days Special is sponsored and paid for by the Denver Post Newspaper, who leases the train from UP, and then THEY sell the tickets as a fund raiser for the various Denver Post Charities.

 

I always look for new trips and a UP one would be fun.

 

Sorry, not much chance of that, because ever since Congress inaugurated Amtrak, it is illegal for any class one railroad to sell passenger tickets to the public. Some sponsoring organization MUST lease the train, and then THEY can sell tickets to the public. 

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Ron_S:

UP does an excellent job of preserving certain historical units, kind of sad a 20 car consist of that caliber only runs a few times a year.

The UP executive passenger cars operate a LOT more than just a "few times a year". During last week's Denver Post Cheyenne Frontier Days Special, the UP also had an "inspection special" operating out in the northwest area, and that was 9 or 10 cars too. Shows how large the executive passenger car fleet really is on the UP. 

I had a conversation with a woman on FB who is a UP employee who works as part of the full time staff for the executive fleet. They run most of the year she said only slowing down in the winter.

Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Matt A:

UP949 & UP6936 appear not to be running. Any specific reason why? Kinda makes my MTH models look prototypical... Some units run and smoke, some do not

Probably because they arent needed. The E's each have about 2400 hp and the DDX has about 6600. To much power for a 22 car train.

NOT!!!!!   They need all the horse power they can get to maintain over 70MPH with that train. Do you really think that a 22 car passenger train, with all those domes, power car, and business cars isn't heavy? Besides, each of those E Units is ONLY 2000HP, thus the whole consist is 12600HP, in order to maintain 70+MPH, on that terrain.

 

For those unaware, each of those executive E Units were totally remanufactured, quite some years ago, and are now only really GP38-2 inside, i.e. there is no longer twin 12 cylinder 567 prime movers (for 2400HP), but only one 16 cylinder 645 (for only 2000HP).

Last edited by Hot Water
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Matt A:

UP949 & UP6936 appear not to be running. Any specific reason why? Kinda makes my MTH models look prototypical... Some units run and smoke, some do not

Probably because they arent needed. The E's each have about 2400 hp and the DDX has about 6600. To much power for a 22 car train.

NOT!!!!!   They need all the horse power they can get to maintain over 70MPH with that train. Do you really think that a 22 car passenger train, with all those domes, power car, and business cars isn't heavy? Besides, each of those E Units is ONLY 2000HP, thus the whole consist is 12600HP, in order to maintain 70+MPH, on that terrain.

 

For those unaware, each of those executive E Units were totally remanufactured, quite some years ago, and are now only really GP38-2 inside, i.e. there is no longer twin 12 cylinder 567 prime movers (for 2400HP), but only one 16 cylinder 645 (for only 2000HP).

I knew about the re engine but obviously got my numbers mixed up. I would think they dont need them all all the time and 12,600 hp is still over kill for 22 cars I think.

Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Matt A:

UP949 & UP6936 appear not to be running. Any specific reason why? Kinda makes my MTH models look prototypical... Some units run and smoke, some do not

Probably because they arent needed. The E's each have about 2400 hp and the DDX has about 6600. To much power for a 22 car train.

NOT!!!!!   They need all the horse power they can get to maintain over 70MPH with that train. Do you really think that a 22 car passenger train, with all those domes, power car, and business cars isn't heavy? Besides, each of those E Units is ONLY 2000HP, thus the whole consist is 12600HP, in order to maintain 70+MPH, on that terrain.

 

For those unaware, each of those executive E Units were totally remanufactured, quite some years ago, and are now only really GP38-2 inside, i.e. there is no longer twin 12 cylinder 567 prime movers (for 2400HP), but only one 16 cylinder 645 (for only 2000HP).

I knew about the re engine but obviously got my numbers mixed up. I would think they dont need them all all the time and 12,600 hp is still over kill for 22 cars I think.

Obviously you have never operated a 22 car passenger special between Cheyenne and Denver.

Originally Posted by jethat:

I knew about the re engine but obviously got my numbers mixed up. I would think they dont need them all all the time and 12,600 hp is still over kill for 22 cars I think.

Matt , you may be aware of this, but, with diesel electric locomotives, there are two separate requirements which are used to determine the assignment of locomotives to a train: weight on drivers, for tractive effort; and horsepower, for speed.

 

In passenger service, horsepower is the dominant requirement.  A train of lightweight equipment averages 75 tons per car.  Diners and domes are heavier, but 75 tons will work.  In the classic era, the City of Los Angeles was usually 14 cars x 75 tons, grossing 1050 tons trailing.  UPRR assigned 3 E-units at up to 2400 horsepower each, totaling 7200 horsepower.  That's 6.8 horsepower/ton.  That is a typical horsepower to ton ratio for a top-tier passenger train, which would allow fast acceleration out of speed restrictions for curves, and respectable speed on moderate grades.  

 

The 22-car Cheyenne Frontier Days train would conservatively gross at 1650 tons.  The 3 E9m's and the DDA40X would total 12600 horsepower, which comes out to 7.6 horsepower/ton (although it's probably closer to the 6.8 horsepower/ton of the classic era, because there are a number heavy cars included[power cars, business cars, domes], which should make the actual tonnage greater).  My figure was conservative.  If you are really interested, you can probably find the train list for the Special, and the weight of each car, on the internet and add them.  But - with all engines on line - the horsepower per ton is 7, give or take, and that's not off the mark for a fast passenger train. 4000 horsepower on line (2 E9m's) would be 2.4 horsepower/ton, which is the ratio of power that would typically be assigned to a decent manifest freight train (boxcars, gondolas, hoppers, tank cars mixed), which would operate on gently undulating territory at a target speed of 60 MPH maximum (but which could not be sustained through undulations).  In the case of the 4000 horsepower Special, the maximum allowable speed could be achieved eventually.  However, it would take longer to reach that speed after every stop or speed reduction.

 

You're probably also aware of the difference between steam and diesel electric locomotives in the speed ranges at which they most efficiently apply their power.  Diesel electric locomotives fade as speed increases, so, for a fast train, the diesel electric locomotive must have a higher horsepower rating than a steam locomotive which would pull the same train on the same fast schedule.

 

So, you can do the math and make up your own mind.  Personally, I believe that the train was properly powered with diesel electric locomotives that, regardless of rebuilding, are 45 to 59 years old.

Last edited by Number 90
Originally Posted by Firewood:

Great video and consist. Thanks for sharing with us.

What's the purpose of the "solid dome" head-end car?

That is the huge Head End Power car. The diesel engine cooling system is reportedly up inside that "dome" portion. I believe it is something around 800KW, and provided 480 volt three phase, 60 hertz, AC power for the entire train.

Jim,

Each Santa Fe El Capitan Hi-Level passenger car weighed 80 tons, according to the Popular Science magazine, dated January 1957.

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
Originally Posted by SantaFeJim:

Hot Water & Number 90 -

 

Good stuff all this hoursepower and tonnage talk.  Can either of you guys tell me the weight (estimate is okay) for the Hi-Level El Capitan cars?

 

Thanks

 

Jim,

Further search on Google brought up the following weights from a Railway Issue magazine, dated July 9, 1956.

72-passenger coach:    162,210 lbs

68-passenger coach:    163,160 lbs

Sky Lounge:          176,100 lbs

Diner:          208,600 lbs

Also looks like very car had fuel & water tanks & 1 diesel generator, except for the diner that had 2 diesel generators.

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
 
Originally Posted by SantaFeJim:
Naveen,

Thanks for the info.  Is this forum great or what?

 

Originally Posted by Number 90:
Originally Posted by jethat:

I knew about the re engine but obviously got my numbers mixed up. I would think they dont need them all all the time and 12,600 hp is still over kill for 22 cars I think.

Matt , you may be aware of this, but, with diesel electric locomotives, there are two separate requirements which are used to determine the assignment of locomotives to a train: weight on drivers, for tractive effort; and horsepower, for speed.

 

In passenger service, horsepower is the dominant requirement.  A train of lightweight equipment averages 75 tons per car.  Diners and domes are heavier, but 75 tons will work.  In the classic era, the City of Los Angeles was usually 14 cars x 75 tons, grossing 1050 tons trailing.  UPRR assigned 3 E-units at up to 2400 horsepower each, totaling 7200 horsepower.  That's 6.8 horsepower/ton.  That is a typical horsepower to ton ratio for a top-tier passenger train, which would allow fast acceleration out of speed restrictions for curves, and respectable speed on moderate grades.  

 

The 22-car Cheyenne Frontier Days train would conservatively gross at 1650 tons.  The 3 E9m's and the DDA40X would total 12600 horsepower, which comes out to 7.6 horsepower/ton (although it's probably closer to the 6.8 horsepower/ton of the classic era, because there are a number heavy cars included[power cars, business cars, domes], which should make the actual tonnage greater.  My figure was conservative.  If you are really interested, you can probably find the train list for the Special, and the weight of each car, on the internet and add them.  But - with all engines on line - the horsepower per ton is 7, give or take, and that's not off the mark for a fast passenger train. 4000 horsepower on line (2 E9m's) would be 2.4 horsepower/ton, which is the ratio of power that would typically be assigned to a decent manifest freight train (boxcars, gondolas, hoppers, tank cars mixed), which would operate on gently undulating territory at a target speed of 60 MPH maximum (but which could not be sustained through undulations).  In the case of the 4000 horsepower Special, the maximum allowable speed could be achieved eventually.  However, it would take longer to reach that speed after every stop or speed reduction.

 

You're probably also aware of the difference between steam and diesel electric locomotives in the speed ranges at which they most efficiently apply their power.  Diesel electric locomotives fade as speed increases, so, for a fast train, the diesel electric locomotive must have a higher horsepower rating than a steam locomotive which would pull the same train on the same fast schedule.

 

So, you can do the math and make up your own mind.  Personally, I believe that the train was properly powered with diesel electric locomotives that, regardless of rebuilding, are 45 to 59 years old.

In 2010 3985 pulled the 100+ car BB circus train by itself to Denver. According to the math 3985 must be about 75,000 Hp!. Of course if factored in the grade a minus one all down hill.. In witch case 4-6,000 hp might maybe be enough..

 

Last edited by jethat
Originally Posted by jethat:

In 2010 3985 pulled the 100+ car BB circus train by itself to Denver. According to the math 3985 must be about 75,000 Hp!. Of course if factored in the grade a minus one all down hill.. In witch case 4-6,000 hp might maybe be enough..

You might want to go back and check that grade profile again, between Cheyenne and Denver. Also, as I recall the 3985 had a diesel MUed for additional power on that circus train (thus having over 10,000HP), plus they didn't have to maintain a 70+ MPH passenger schedule.

Last edited by Hot Water

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×