Skip to main content

Often, there's specific attributes that gain favor: looks or performance.

 

I consider myself to be quite visually inclined; but, when it comes to machines(locomotives) that are expected to perform, it's the capable performers that I value the most. Useless good looks don't have any real value.

 

I have models of many different locomotives; and, to be honest, none are really what I would call good looking. Visually, when I look at pictures of my locomotive collection, F units probably show the best.

 

In real world railroading, modern GE locomotives(nothing special about their looks) have earned my admiration; they seem to get the job done, for the industry. For some reason(s) that makes having a model or two, of GE road power, more satisfying.

 

I guess I'm not that shallow after all.

 

 

Rick

 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

We probably all have our reasons that justify what we model, and I can certainly understand your logic.  My years as a child growing up in a railroad town is what stuck with me.  The steam era was fading fast, so I reminisce and have a yearning for first gen diesel power, particularly Alcos.  My layout and trains bring that all back for me, which is why I'm in the hobby!  Mis-matched era's of boxcars, some ominously dilapidated, all sizes and body material/types, and many with flat spots is what I miss, and of course, cabeese!  It must have really been something to see the big steamers thunder by! 

 

Stack   

Being born in the late 40's I really don't remember the steam era even though as a kid I remember seeing some steam switchers. 

 

So in my hobby I like the era of super steam and nobody was better then the UP. I have quite a few of UP steam from Challengers, 9000's, and many others. I also liked that the UP experimented with the likes of the turbines of which I have several. 

 

To to me they all look good. 

 

Hi Stack,

 

Another thing I admire, is invention... trying something different.

 

I have models of guys(manufacturers) that gave it a shot; didn't succeed in the long, but they run made an impact, at the time, i.e - Fairbanks Morse's H24-66 Train Master.

 

Alco/GE had some nice firsts, too. Didn't they have the first road switcher, and the C630 had some new technology, for the time.

 

 

 

 

Having been born in the early mid 1940's, i remember regularly seeing steam on the NYC's mainline. In fact my first trip to New York City  from west of Albany was pulled by steam all the way to Croton Harmon.

Seeing early Alco diesels was a treat. Explains why i have 6 compared to 1 EMD unit.

However for sheer grace, design and power the GG1 remains unmatched; The summer after college i regularly rode "clockers" pulled by them from Philadelphia to Newark and return. i now have 5 of them!

jackson

Maybe I am not the norm, but I purchase what I like regardless of whether it is steam or diesel, or what the road name is. Just about everything runs smooth and performs as good as it looks. A good example is the ATSF 3000 that in my opinion is one of the nicest steamers ever made and the performance is spectacular.

I really have no life experiences seeing steam locomotives other than museums and Steam Town PA. 

 

I just find that some engines I see just captivate my senses. Could be any manufacture, could be diesel or steam. I wish I could understand my own reasoning on this to narrow down my selections but they remain extremely varied.

 

I love them all but some just hit me as "I gotta get one of those" my love of model engines has led me on a path to read just about whatever I can about the protypes and their original uses.

I agree, Lee, that GE is, and has been, doing something right. Some might think GE is somewhat of a latecomer, to the motive power industry. When you take a look at the information available, GE has a significant history, re: building various types of locomotives.

 

Jeff,

 

I have often bought whatever hit the spot, at the time.

 

 

Rick

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×