Skip to main content

Hi all,

I'd like to invite you all to the 28th DCS User Group Meeting marking the 20th Anniversary of the release of DCS.  We will be meeting Wednesday, April 27th at Eagle's Nest restaurant.  We'll have a presentation on the history of DCS and what lies ahead in the near future.

If you have any DCS hardware that needs a firmware upgrade (TIU, Remote, WIU, DCS Commander), free upgrades will be available before dinner.

As before, you do NOT have to buy dinner to attend, but I need to give the restaurant a rough headcount of how many will be dining.

WHAT YOU NEED TO DO TO ATTEND

Reply to this thread with your name and anyone else who will be attending with you.

Indicate in your reply if you will be dining at Eagle's Nest.

OR

Send the same info to me at hikelogauge@gmail.com



WHERE?

Eagle's Nest Restaurant (banquet room upstairs)

2519 Mt Rose Ave

York, PA 17402



WHEN?

5 to 6 PM - Free firmware upgrades for Remotes, TIU's and WIU's

6 PM - Dinner.  You can check out the Eagle's Nest menu HERE

7 to 7:45 PM - Presentation on DCS by Dave Hikel and other guest speakers.

7:45 to ??? - Q and A



Hope to see you Wednesday, 4/27!

Last edited by Dave Hikel
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Don Merz,

If someone wants to record the meeting I have no problem with that.  I won't be hauling a video camera cross country, so it won't be me.  If anyone wants to volunteer to record the event please let me know.

Thanks Marty!  One of these years we'll have to get you to a meet.

Rich R, welcome aboard!

@Dave Hikel posted:

Jay and guest, welcome aboard!

ScoutingDad,

Again, I have no problem with someone streaming and/or recording the meeting.  I won't have the gear to do it, but if someone wants to volunteer to stream the meet just let me know and I'll try to assist.

A video of the main part of the meeting would be awesome.   I will not be able to get off work in time to attend.   

Either way - have a great time everyone!

I am sure others will chime in but Dave did a great job discussing several technical details such as the frequency spectrum and the digital message length.  Good questions resulted in some detailed discussion of star wiring and reflection of signals.  Thanks also to Andy Edelman for attending and providing insights from his perspective.  Overall, I felt it was a positive picture for continued health of the system, IMHO.  Apparently, in the future, it is going to be an annual event in October.

@hokie71 posted:

I am sure others will chime in but Dave did a great job discussing several technical details such as the frequency spectrum and the digital message length.  Good questions resulted in some detailed discussion of star wiring and reflection of signals.  Thanks also to Andy Edelman for attending and providing insights from his perspective.  Overall, I felt it was a positive picture for continued health of the system, IMHO.  Apparently, in the future, it is going to be an annual event in October.

Dave did do an excellent job. I found his presentation on the origins of the spread spectrum technology used in DCS fascinating. I've never used the names Hedy Lamarr and Nikola Tesla in the same sentence, or at all come to think of it, but next time I hit the engine start up on the DCS app, I've got a story to tell the grandkids. Very thoughtful presentation.

We'll be doing a rebuild later this year and took away a few helpful tips on DCS wiring including use stranded wire, keep terminal blocks within 8 feet of the TIU, distance of wire from terminal to the track and wires being of different lengths not an issue but stay away from kinks in the wiring. I bought a packet of Dave's terminating filters to place at the TIU and at the far end of the track as he described. I'd need to sit through the presentation again to understand why I am going to do that, but for now, I trust in Dave.

Andy's tip on keeping the communication signal strong was to keep your track clean. He also said it would be better to start with new track v used for reliability. As for that, probably the most appropriate use of a cliche I could offer..."the train left the station." Oh, well.

@Mooner posted:

We'll be doing a rebuild later this year and took away a few helpful tips on DCS wiring including use stranded wire,

Please explain the comment about stranded wire.  While I'm well aware of the skin effect for high frequency signals, the only time there would be a significant difference between stranded wire and solid wire for signal propagation is if you were using Litz wire.

Litz wire employs a stranded wire with individually insulated conductors forming a bundle. Each thin conductor is less than a skin-depth, so an individual strand does not suffer an appreciable skin effect loss. The strands must be insulated from each other—otherwise all the wires in the bundle would short together, behave like a single large wire, and still have skin effect problems. Furthermore, the strands cannot occupy the same radial position in the bundle over long distances: the electromagnetic effects that cause the skin effect would still disrupt conduction. The weaving or twisting pattern of the wires in the bundle is designed so that the individual strands are on the outside of the bundle for a distance (where the EM field changes are smaller and the strand sees low resistance), and are on the inside of the bundle for a distance (where the EM field changes are the strongest and the resistance is higher). If strands have a comparable impedance, current is distributed equally among every strand within the cable. This allows the interior of the Litz wire to contribute to the overall conductivity of the bundle.

FWIW, I use stranded wire for a totally different reason, it's much easier to work with, especially in larger gauges.

Please explain the comment about stranded wire.  While I'm well aware of the skin effect for high frequency signals, the only time there would be a significant difference between stranded wire and solid wire for signal propagation is if you were using Litz wire.

Litz wire employs a stranded wire with individually insulated conductors forming a bundle. Each thin conductor is less than a skin-depth, so an individual strand does not suffer an appreciable skin effect loss. The strands must be insulated from each other—otherwise all the wires in the bundle would short together, behave like a single large wire, and still have skin effect problems. Furthermore, the strands cannot occupy the same radial position in the bundle over long distances: the electromagnetic effects that cause the skin effect would still disrupt conduction. The weaving or twisting pattern of the wires in the bundle is designed so that the individual strands are on the outside of the bundle for a distance (where the EM field changes are smaller and the strand sees low resistance), and are on the inside of the bundle for a distance (where the EM field changes are the strongest and the resistance is higher). If strands have a comparable impedance, current is distributed equally among every strand within the cable. This allows the interior of the Litz wire to contribute to the overall conductivity of the bundle.

FWIW, I use stranded wire for a totally different reason, it's much easier to work with, especially in larger gauges.

No idea, John. Just wrote down Dave's tips. Hope I got it right as I wouldn't want to sew confusion.

There was no video recording of the event, and I did not notice anyone taking notes.

Hokie71 and some others are on point with their comments, and one more thing regarding MTH - The boards that are currently being made are going into new production trains.  So if your waiting for a board to repair an engine, the wait will continue.  It appears as of now, they are only cabable of producing enough boards to meet the new production numbers.  Obviously this is very frustating for train owners waiting on replacement boards and "repair guys" who are trying to accomplish these repairs.

There was no video recording of the event, and I did not notice anyone taking notes.

Hokie71 and some others are on point with their comments, and one more thing regarding MTH - The boards that are currently being made are going into new production trains.  So if your waiting for a board to repair an engine, the wait will continue.  It appears as of now, they are only cabable of producing enough boards to meet the new production numbers.  Obviously this is very frustating for train owners waiting on replacement boards and "repair guys" who are trying to accomplish these repairs.

Yes, I do recall them saying boards are going into new production. Also remember them saying the shortage of supply is outside of their control and it is the same within other industries that would get priority over production of model train boards - mentioned cars and phones among them. No mention of when the situation might be different, but if you read any current articles about supply chain issues for the auto or computer manufacturing industries, the chip shortage is going to last through 2022.

It was also said that the low supply has really impacted pricing of anything that you can find and that the pricing on the latest trains has those cost built in. I've seen some other forum posts about the higher cost of the ex-MTH diesels produced by Atlas; this seems to rationally explain that difference.

The talk was anything but gloom and doom, but it was realistic relative to where the global supply chain stands today.

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×