Skip to main content

In Lionel compatible, and planned to use on the layout, I just collected D&RGW in locomotives. and cars.  However, the Joint Line and the area in the period before WWII saw C&S(CB&Q), D&SL, Colorado Midland, although the feds killed it off in WWI, Rock Island, Great Western, and Missouri Pacific.  Those roadnames are found on cars, and may eventually be found on a few locos.  Most other locomotives and many cars are painted or repainted or will be repainted for my short line's fictitious name, which

will give me a total of two major ones.

A.T.&S.F. out in front by a large margin with PRR (many various), UP (diesel & steam), Southern (several), NS (Dash 9s),  NYC (a Hudson & PAs), N&W ( J class & A class) and with one example of each -  D&H Trainmaster, L&N E7s, C&O Berkshire, GM&O F3s, Rio Grande FTs, D&RG Southern K27, Milwaukee Road S3, Western Maryland FAs, Texas Special F3s, New Haven RS1, and  Virginian in a Large Scale Triplex.

Have been trying to pare down due to space restraints but I like a LOT of different roads!

 

So David, after re reading your original post I guess I should not have posted here after all!

 

I'm also with Brian above - there are so many beautiful passenger trains...

Last edited by c.sam

For my late 1940s era layout, 90% of my engines and passenger cars are Pennsy.  I have some Southern Railway passenger equipment pulled by F2s that interchanged with the Pennsy in Washington DC on its way between New York and New Orleans, and I have the Golden State pulled by Rock Island E6s that interchanged with the Pennsy in Chicago on its way between New York and Los Angeles.  70% of my freight cars are Pennsy, and the rest are a mixture of cars from eastern railroads and company cars.

Until I started getting on this site, and learning from Bob Delbridge, I thought the

C&O was the only road that had "smaller" steam locos that looked the way I thought they

should.  Rio Grande articulateds generally have the right appearance. Sure looks like the Seaboard "smaller" engines did, too.  I model neither C&O nor Seaboard, which is an incentive to model a fictitious road that uses locos styled like those.

I model the Erie and the New York Ontario and Western railroads on my layout (except for Coketown which is a private industrial line.). Everything else is on the shelf. However due to recent financial difficulties there have been some merger talks with the Lackawanna railroad to merge with and bail out the Erie and possibly the O&W. That's the nice thing about modeling, you can change history whenever you want! It will be no time at all before that NYO&W SD-60 pulls in the yard.

One or two (locomotive) road names? I wish. Focus really can improve one's en-

joyment, as does reality-based operations (working on that; just let me do ONE more

command upgrade...).

 

Definitely I'm NYC- and GM&O-centered, but ATSF (steam mostly; I actually do not

own any Warbonnet F3's) and SP (AC9 - the Articulated of Articulateds)...and so on.

USRA 2-6-6-2 - hard to beat...Louisville and Nashville, Southern...N&W steam,

though the N&W means little to me as such...C&O Super Power, those Big Limas

and Baldwin Hudsons...the little Alabama, Tennessee and Northern - means nothing to you guys, but I actually model it...not much of a UP fan, but I have a Veranda and a 4-12-2...the "P Company" seldom rates in a NYC house, but I have an old Williams brass 4-4-4-4 (they look like they are from Mars) and a 3rd Rail 6-4-4-6 (20 feet long); nary a K4s, though...it goes on and on.

 

I wish that I could stick to 2 or 3. It's really better.

Originally Posted by Bob Delbridge:

SEABOARD AIR LINE of course.  Here's my newly completed class Q3 Mikado, look at the beautiful face:

 

 

I wouldn't mind getting something for Atlantic Coast Line (maybe a USRA Pacific) and N&W (the mighty "J"), but I'm lucky just to have the 10 engines I do.


Wow very impressive you even got the bar above the airpumps.Yep thats a q3 alright you even have the right kind of tender.Now all you have to do now is is get a m2 mountain.If you doyou can,t go wrong with a mth mohawk.You could go with the oil tender or coal tender they had them both.I have a question for you.Are you gonna try to build a R1 2-6-6-4 steam locomotive?They operated through my home town monroe nc to charottle nc.You did one heck a job on this locomotive.

Originally Posted by colorado hirailer:

Until I started getting on this site, and learning from Bob Delbridge, I thought the

C&O was the only road that had "smaller" steam locos that looked the way I thought they

should.  Rio Grande articulateds generally have the right appearance. Sure looks like the Seaboard "smaller" engines did, too.  I model neither C&O nor Seaboard, which is an incentive to model a fictitious road that uses locos styled like those.

Someone learned something from me?!?!?!  Most humbling, thanks!

 

seaboard streak wrote:

 

Wow very impressive you even got the bar above the air pumps.  Yep that's a q3 alright you even have the right kind of tender.  Now all you have to do now is is get a m2 mountain.  If you do you can't go wrong with a MTH Mohawk.  You could go with the oil tender or coal tender they had them both.I have a question for you.  Are you gonna try to build a R1 2-6-6-4 steam locomotive?  They operated through my home town Monroe NC to Charlotte NC.You did one heck a job on this locomotive

 

Thanks!  I have no plans to do a mountain or a R1.  About the only engines I want (to round out my Seaboard fleet) are a Pacific and a F3.  An accurate Seaboard F3 MAY be coming from Atlas one of these days, but a Seaboard Pacific...no way.  An ACL USRA Pacific (sometime in the future) will have to do.

The replies are fascinating.  Since I decided one day to collect every Lionel TMCC Geep and accomplished that mission, I run everything from Lionel Lines to Pennsy.  And mostly classic sized and PWC rolling stock, active with accessories.  I may slowly acquire more cabeese to mate with my Geep fleet, but I'm fine with mix and match for now.  It will always be a make believe world for me and I just can't take it that seriously.  I like flawless operations and building models and scenes.  I also like and appreciate everyone else's approach or interests in the hobby.  Like I said, it's fascinating.

Other than my childhood PRR Alco FAs, and a "Lionel Lines" 2025, every locomotive I own is either Reading Lines or is scheduled to eventually become something Reading Lines.  Eventually I may expand to include CNJ, L&NE, LV and PRR as they all interchanged with the Reading.  (So did the B&O and WM, but not in the coal region I intend to model.)

Originally Posted by mike.caruso:

Have not been too successful narrowing it down to one or two road names…but I am down to one continent.

 

- Mike

Heck Mike, only one continent? I just can't narrow my focus at all. I have US/Canada, Australian, Japanese, French, British, German, Swiss, Czech, New Zealand and God knows what else. I like the way some people can be so disciplined, and focus on one or two roads. Me? No chance.

I narrowed my roads down to three. UP, NYC & N&W and modeling the transition era. I figure I have plenty of motive power to pick from and I do like articulated engines . I decided to narrow down to three fairly soon after getting back into the hobby, since a guy could go broke or divorced if left to buying every engine they like.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×